Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

From Denial to Access: Rethinking Oncology Care Through AI, Clinical Trials, and Patient-Centered Innovation

The rapid advancement in oncology therapies is outpacing the healthcare system's ability to manage them, resulting in increased prior authorization and treatment denials. This article explores the potential of AI and clinical trials to alleviate these issues while emphasizing the necessity of human oversight. Experts discuss the impact on patient care and the opportunities to enhance access and reduce costs.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Promoted content from PayerWatch on MarketScale.

By Payerwatch · Ai in HealthcareBrian McgrawCancer Treatment DelaysClinical Trials Access
Share

Key takeaways

01

Oncology denials are financially and clinically impactful, delaying treatments.

02

AI can augment appeal processes but requires vigilant human oversight.

03

Clinical trials should be integrated earlier in patient care pathways to improve access.

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

The rapid expansion of precision medicine, biologics, and targeted cancer therapies is transforming oncology—but it’s also overwhelming a system not built to keep pace. In the U.S., cancer drugs now account for some of the highest-cost treatments in healthcare, and with that has come a surge in prior authorization requirements and denials. Studies suggest physicians spend nearly two business days per week on administrative tasks like authorizations, contributing significantly to burnout and delayed care.

So how can clinicians ensure patients receive timely, life-saving treatments in a system increasingly shaped by cost controls and automation? And more importantly—can AI become part of the solution rather than just a tool for denials?

On this episode of PayerWatch, host Brian McGraw is joined by Dr. Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla, Co-Founder and Chief Medical AI Officer of Massive Bio, and Dr. Kendall Smith, Chief Medical Officer and Chief Physician Advisor at PayerWatch, for a conversation about oncology denials, prior authorization burden, and the emerging role of AI in appeals and access. Together, they examine how payer decision-making affects cancer patients, why clinical trialsPay are often overlooked in denial workflows, and how human oversight must remain central as AI becomes more common on both sides of the claims equation.

Key Takeaways from the episode:

  • Oncology denials are uniquely high stakes. Expensive biologics, chemo regimens, and precision therapies are often subject to heavier scrutiny, creating delays that can worsen outcomes and increase financial toxicity for patients.
  • AI can help, but only with human oversight. The guests discuss how AI can support appeals, clinical trial matching, and documentation, while warning that hallucinated citations and unchecked outputs can undermine care decisions.
  • Clinical trials should be considered earlier, not later. Instead of treating trials as a last resort or administrative complication, the episode argues they should be more proactively presented as care options that may reduce costs and expand access.

Dr. Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla is a practicing medical oncologist and hematologist, as well as the Co-Founder and Chief Medical AI Officer of Massive Bio. He has spent years working at the intersection of oncology, patient access, and artificial intelligence, helping develop AI-driven tools that connect patients to clinical trials and treatment options. In the episode, he also references his leadership role in a large hematology-oncology network and his long-standing interest in applying data science and computational tools to real-world cancer care.

Dr. Kendall Smith serves as Chief Medical Officer and Chief Physician Advisor at PayerWatch, where he brings deep expertise in chemotherapy and biologic denials, appeals strategy, and payer-provider disputes. His contributions to the episode focus on the practical realities of appeal workflows, the risks and opportunities of AI-assisted case preparation, and the importance of maintaining a human-in-the-loop approach when patient lives are on the line.

Part of this channel

PayerWatch

News, updates, and expert insights from PayerWatch.

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

P
Payerwatch

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

More nurses did not lift safety culture scores in a 205-hospital analysis

More nurses did not lift safety culture scores in a 205-hospital analysis

A 2026 analysis in the Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy combined 2021–2022 HSOPC results with AHA, HCRIS, and AHRF data across 205 hospitals and reported that small increases in nurse and physician staffing lined up with slightly lower “percent positive” patient safety culture scores in several dimensions. According to the Journal of Healthcare Management abstract hosted on Ovid, the study described a 2% decrease in positive staffing perceptions with β=−0.02 per additional nurse FTE and a −0.01 change in perceived reporting of patient safety events per additional nurse, while additional physician staffing was associated with −0.01 changes in perceptions of communication openness and organizational learning, and joint ventures were associated with a −0.03 change in perceptions of management support for safety (all p<0.05). The operational read is that adding headcount by itself does not ensure stronger safety-culture signals; hospitals also need the workflows that turn observations into closed-loop fixes, from “just culture” reporting expectations to facilities work-order follow-through, as described by Sentara Health leaders in Chief Healthcare Executive and by Health Facilities Management’s environment-of-care guidance. For health system operators, the near-term consequence shows up in how HSOPC survey targets connect to leader scorecards, rounding programs, digital reporting tools, and joint-venture governance, especially where staffing growth is driven by complexity and handoffs.

  • 01If HSOPC “percent positive” scores are a board KPI, staffing increases can move in the opposite direction unless reporting and learning loops scale too. The study’s negative coefficients are small, but they signal a measurement risk during growth.
  • 02Facilities and clinical safety cultures converge in the same pipeline: observation, reporting, triage, work order, verification. HFM Magazine’s door-lock example is the same system problem as event reporting, it is throughput and closure, not awareness.
  • 03Joint ventures can add operational complexity that dilutes perceived management support for safety. That belongs in JV governance charters and integration playbooks, not only in finance models.

Sep 1, 2026

Smart ICU and ambient AI cut errors when they feed data and notes into the EMR

Smart ICU and ambient AI cut errors when they feed data and notes into the EMR

Two HIMSS26 APAC case studies point to the same operational lesson: hospitals are getting measurable gains from “smart ICU” device integration and ambient AI documentation only when those tools are tightly integrated into core clinical workflows. Pondok Indah Hospital Group in Indonesia reported reductions of up to 70% in ICU administrative errors and 40% in adverse drug reactions after integrating smart devices, according to Healthcare IT News. Sir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital in India reported ambient AI is now used for nearly 90% of progress notes and shift handovers across five live use cases on a single EMR-integrated platform, also reported by Healthcare IT News. New JAMA Network cardiovascular research adds a parallel signal on the clinical side, with AI-enabled acquisition and interpretation approaches moving into screening and triage workflows, which raises procurement questions about validation, interoperability, and change management at the bedside.

  • 01A useful benchmark is emerging for documentation automation: “nearly 90% of progress notes and shift handovers” on ambient AI when it is deployed as one EMR-integrated platform, not a set of point tools (Healthcare IT News).
  • 02The measurable ROI in ‘smart ICU’ programs shows up where operators feel pain: fewer administrative errors and medication-related events, not in abstract “digitization” metrics (Healthcare IT News reported up to 70% and 40% reductions, respectively).
  • 03For hospitals with multiple device vendors and fragmented documentation workflows, integration work, interfaces, identity, order context, and governance, is likely to consume more effort than model selection, so contracts and implementation plans should price integration explicitly.

Sep 1, 2026

Gartner says AI budgets are growing faster than the rules to control them

Gartner says AI budgets are growing faster than the rules to control them

Gartner’s late-August 2026 research points to a familiar operational pattern in enterprise AI: budgets are rising faster than the controls meant to keep costs and risk predictable. In a Aug. 26 press release, Gartner said AI spending by customer service leaders surged 38% even as overall service and support budgets rose 2%. Earlier, at Gartner’s March 2026 Data & Analytics Summit, Gartner analysts said only 44% of organizations had adopted financial guardrails or AI FinOps practices, a gap that becomes more painful as AI workloads scale. The practical takeaway for CIOs, customer service operations leaders, and data and analytics teams is to treat AI governance, cost attribution, and human escalation paths as procurement requirements, not after-the-fact fixes.

  • 01A useful benchmark for planning: Gartner pegs AI spend growth in customer service at 38% versus 2% budget growth overall, a mismatch that forces reallocation and harder ROI proof.
  • 02Only 44% of organizations have adopted AI FinOps-style guardrails, according to Gartner. If AI is moving into production, chargeback and consumption limits need to be designed into the rollout.
  • 03Gartner also forecasts spending on securing AI will hit $4.8 billion in 2027, signaling that AI security is becoming a standalone budget line rather than a feature bundled into existing platforms.

Sep 1, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

About the Experts

P
Payerwatch
DA
Dr. Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla

Co-Founder and Chief Medical AI Officer

Massive Bio

Dr. Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla is a practicing medical oncologist and hematologist. He is the Co-Founder and Chief Medical AI Officer at Massive Bio, where he focuses on integrating AI into cancer care.

DK
Dr. Kendall Smith

Chief Medical Officer and Chief Physician Advisor

PayerWatch

Dr. Kendall Smith serves as the Chief Medical Officer and Chief Physician Advisor at PayerWatch. He specializes in improving healthcare provider outcomes in response to payer denials.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512