Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesBusiness Services

Efficiency in Accounting Practice Gets a Turbo Boost with Generative AI

Accounting professionals are reclaiming 50% of their time as generative AI handles repetitive tasks and complex analysis

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Business Services teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Mfon Akpan · AccountingAccounting EfficiencyAi in AccountingDr. Mfon Akpan
Share

Key takeaways

01

Accounting professionals are reclaiming 50% of their time as generative AI handles repetitive tasks and complex analysis

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Business Services?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Business Services coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Generative AI's seismic shift in accounting is more than just numbers—it's revolutionizing the very fabric of the industry by driving efficiency in accounting practice.

Recent discussions amongst over 20 accounting thought leaders, highlighted the transformative potential of AI in the accounting sector. Blake Oliver, Founder and CEO of Earmark CPE, emphasized that generative AI could slash task times by over 50%, with many professionals already leveraging tools like ChatGPT for diverse tasks, from financial analysis to business planning. A notable 53% of influencers utilize generative AI for marketing and communication, and a promising 50% of executives have integrated AI into finance and tax departments. The technology promises to address the talent shortage in accounting and significantly enhance productivity, especially in audit and tax domains. While there are concerns about data security and copyright, the overarching sentiment is optimistic, with firms urged to adopt best practices for AI's maximal and safe utilization.

Is generative AI perfected yet? Not quite. However, Dr. Mfon Akpan, Assistant Professor of Accounting at Methodist University, believes utilizing AI to generate efficiency in accounting practice could provide firms an edge over their competition.

Mfon's Thoughts

How are organizations experiencing benefits from adopting AI in their accounting practices? That is an easy one, efficiency, and that is key. So, if you think about a fixed rate engagement, and now you're able to complete, let's say, a process that would take eight hours in five minutes with AI. Then you have an hour for review; you're way ahead of the game. So, I think the big benefit at this point is efficiency. I say efficiency at this point because AI, as far as the reliability factor, is not 100%; it's not 90%; however, it can get you at least 50 to 70% of the way.

So, when you think about getting started, particularly with text-based work, you're 50 to 70% ahead of your competition or other employees.
— Dr. Mfon Akpan, Assistant Professor of Accounting at Methodist University

And then you have for that remainder, you need a review. So, with the example I gave with eight hours of work, that starts at zero and generates whatever content needs to be created. And then, with AI, you can produce it in five minutes. However, you still have to review it. So that goes to that question of efficiency, accuracy, and decision-making. The efficiency definitely increases it. However, the accuracy portion is not there yet. So, you need to review.

But even from eight hours to an hour to five minutes, that's a huge leap in efficiency. But then it adds some drawbacks or ethical questions. Do you disclose to your clients that you're using AI? So that's a question: should that be disclosed? And if it's being disclosed, should you pay your employees more? Should you charge less to your clients or even more because you're using a technology that makes you even more efficient? So those are some of the questions that come into play.

If we talk about the concerns or challenges, I would say more so on the ethical side of things, particularly with the technology. Is this new? No. You can't have that whole question of ethics without offshoring. Do you disclose to your client that you have someone in another country preparing your work, their work? In this case, it's AI. So, we've seen those cases, but now it's, in a sense, it's not being offshored. It's being mechanized with technology. Efficiency, and then as the technology improves, I would say that accuracy will definitely increase, and then the impact on the decision-making will increase because with the accuracy, then the output can be trusted more and more, which would lower the review time.

As it moves forward and becomes, let's say, even more efficient, if possible, from a five-minute timeframe, if we're using that example; it's cut down to two minutes. And because of the increase in accuracy, the review time can now be 15 minutes versus an hour.
— Dr. Mfon Akpan, Assistant Professor of Accounting at Methodist University

And because of that increased reliability, you can put more trust in the data or even lighter review. The review may not be as intensive. I think it's interesting times.

Will more students be coming into the profession? I think there'll be more employees who may not be as skilled. However, critical thinking and the base accounting skills will still be needed because you have to review. You may have someone who is putting the information into whatever AI system; however, you'll still need someone for review. And I think that will be around; I don't think that will disappear. The number of people with this critical accounting knowledge may reduce as the accuracy or the time for review decreases, but I think you still need people in it.

But will it draw in more people to the accounting profession? I would say it'll draw more people into the workforce of accounting. As far as studying, it could be flat or the same with or without AI.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Business Services starts with a company putting its consultants, practice leads, and account teams on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Clients hire the firm whose thinking they have already read, which means fewer cold conversations for your partners.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

Mfon Akpan
Mfon AkpanAssistant Professor Of Accounting

As an Assistant Professor of Accounting at Methodist University, Mfon has over ten years of experience in teaching, research, and service in accounting and financial management. He holds a Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) degree from Indiana Wesleyan University and a Chartered Global Management Accountant (CGMA). This credential demonstrates his expertise and commitment to the highest standards of ethics and professional practice. His mission is to provide quality education and mentorship to students, to advance knowledge and practice in accounting and related disciplines, and to contribute to the community and the profession. He has developed and taught courses in accounting, finance, business, and management at undergraduate and graduate levels, using innovative pedagogical methods and online platforms. Mfon has also published and presented his researches on accounting topics in peer-reviewed journals and conferences and participated in various academic and professional committees and organizations. Additionally, he has leveraged his analytical, customer relationship, and new business development skills to serve as an Audit Committee Member for the City of Fayetteville, North Carolina.

Follow Business Services Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Business Services: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Business Services buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Business Services expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your consultants, practice leads, and account teams into the articles, video, and social content Business Services buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Business Services Insights

Life insurers are pushing $2M ‘fluidless’ cases, and underwriting teams will feel it first

Life insurers are pushing $2M ‘fluidless’ cases, and underwriting teams will feel it first

Foresters Financial expanded its U.S. accelerated underwriting program effective April 26, raising limits to $2 million for ages 18–60 and $1 million for ages 61–65, and adding iPipeline iGO e-App pre-screening and broader eligibility, according to InsuranceNewsNet. In parallel, Concirrus and Applied Underwriters said they will launch SkyMiner in Q3 2026, positioning it as a conversational interface to enterprise knowledge with grounded, cited answers, according to Applied Underwriters’ June 29, 2026 announcement. Together, the moves signal that “fluidless” underwriting is shifting from an edge-case channel to a mainstream lane where underwriting operations, data governance, and producer workflow design determine cycle time as much as risk rules.

  • 01A $2 million accelerated underwriting ceiling changes what breaks first: not the model, but case triage, evidence ordering rules, and exception handling when a ‘fluidless’ file turns ‘fluid-required’ midstream.
  • 02The differentiator is moving to workflow surfaces producers actually use, Foresters tied AUW eligibility checks to iPipeline iGO e-App, while Concirrus and Applied Underwriters are betting on cited, verifiable answers to reduce internal back-and-forth.
  • 03These upgrades matter most for carriers and MGAs with fragmented underwriting knowledge across guidelines, memos, and historical case notes, because conversational layers increase speed only when the citations are governed and auditable.

Sep 2, 2026

Temp staffing is still a 2.2 million-worker weekly market, and the buyers are changing

Temp staffing is still a 2.2 million-worker weekly market, and the buyers are changing

The American Staffing Association (ASA) says about 2.2 million temporary and contract employees worked for US staffing companies in an average week in 2024, and staffing provided job and career opportunities for about 11 million employees that year. Staffing Industry Analysts reported ASA elected its 2026 board officers on Oct. 7, 2025, naming LaSalle Network’s Tom Gimbel as chair alongside executives from Allegis Group, Kelly, Adecco Group US Foundation and others. Taken together, the scale numbers and the new board roster point to an industry steering committee that spans industrial, professional, and healthcare staffing, right as enterprise operators are being asked to justify flexible labor programs with clearer performance and compliance metrics. For procurement, HR, and operations leaders, the practical consequence shows up in MSAs and SOWs being renegotiated now: rate structures, conversion and tenure terms, and skills coverage across higher-skilled roles that ASA says make up 40% of staffing assignments.

  • 01A useful planning benchmark is ASA’s 2024 weekly average of 2.2 million temp/contract workers, it’s a reality check for how much surge capacity the channel can supply at any given time.
  • 02The popular ‘flexibility’ story is often overstated: ASA reports 64% of staffing employees say they use the model to bridge jobs or land a job, versus 20% citing schedule flexibility. That gap should shape retention and conversion assumptions in workforce plans.
  • 03ASA’s own fact sheet mixes 2024/2023 workforce figures with 2021 counts of firms and offices, a reminder for buyers to ask suppliers what’s changed in branch footprint, specialization, and delivery model since those baselines.

Sep 2, 2026

AI agents are spreading fast, but most firms still can’t price the gain

AI agents are spreading fast, but most firms still can’t price the gain

Survey data in 2026 shows AI adoption accelerating in professional services, recruiting, and financial services, but measurement and pricing are lagging. Thomson Reuters reported organization-wide AI use rose to 40% in 2026 from 22% in 2025, while only 18% of organizations track AI ROI, even as 74% of professionals use AI several times a week. Staffing Industry Analysts reported 61% of staffing firms now use AI in recruiting operations, yet SHRM benchmarking still pegs average non-executive cost per hire at $4,700, with cold outreach response rates down 27% amid higher send volume. WealthManagement, citing NVIDIA’s 2026 survey of 800+ financial services professionals, reported 65% of firms are actively using AI and nearly 100% expect budgets to stay flat or increase, while agentic AI’s main blockers are reliability (34%) and internal skills gaps (33), making governance, instrumentation, and commercial terms the next operational battleground.

  • 01A useful benchmark for internal audits: Thomson Reuters found only 18% of organizations track AI ROI, even while firm-wide AI adoption hit 40% in 2026 and individual use reached 74%.
  • 02AI efficiency gains are getting competed away where the bottleneck is attention, not labor. Staffing Industry Analysts reported cold outreach response rates fell 27% as AI-driven messaging volume rose, while average cost per hire stayed around $4,700.
  • 03Agentic AI deployments are moving into production in regulated environments. NVIDIA’s financial services survey shows 21% have deployed agents, but the top reported frictions are reliability (34%) and skills to manage them (33%), which should show up as budget lines for monitoring and model operations, not just software licenses.

Sep 2, 2026

Explore More Business Services Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Business Services.

Browse Business Services Hub

About the Expert

Mfon Akpan
Mfon Akpan

Assistant Professor Of Accounting

As an Assistant Professor of Accounting at Methodist University, Mfon has over ten years of experience in teaching, research, and service in accounting and financial management. He holds a Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) degree from Indiana Wesleyan University and a Chartered Global Management Accountant (CGMA). This credential demonstrates his expertise and commitment to the highest standards of ethics and professional practice. His mission is to provide quality education and mentorship to students, to advance knowledge and practice in accounting and related disciplines, and to contribute to the community and the profession. He has developed and taught courses in accounting, finance, business, and management at undergraduate and graduate levels, using innovative pedagogical methods and online platforms. Mfon has also published and presented his researches on accounting topics in peer-reviewed journals and conferences and participated in various academic and professional committees and organizations. Additionally, he has leveraged his analytical, customer relationship, and new business development skills to serve as an Audit Committee Member for the City of Fayetteville, North Carolina.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Business Services and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512