Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to Industries

Education Technology

For Post-Pandemic Online Tutoring to Work, Educators Must Address Personalization & Scale

Paper’s Online Tutoring Solution rocketed as educators looked for solutions to shore up the learning loss from the pandemic. Paper, a virtual tutoring company, provides an enticing hook: high-quality support for students at a lower price point. Many education systems took the bait, using COVID relief funds to provide students with 24/7 access to on-demand…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Paper’s Online Tutoring Solution rocketed as educators looked for solutions to shore up the learning loss from the pandemic. Paper, a virtual tutoring company, provides an enticing hook: high-quality support for students at a lower price point. Many education systems took the bait, using COVID relief funds to provide students with 24/7 access to on-demand post-pandemic online tutoring.

Only one problem: students aren’t using the tool. In an article on Chalkbeat, officials in Columbus City Schools found less than 8% of students with access to the service logged on last school year, with half of those only using it once. Columbus school board president, Jennifer Adair, noted one of her students found the experience frustrating and annoying.

Educators recognize the need for such solutions, but if the answer isn’t helping the student, it only compounds the problem. That doesn’t mean educators should abandon online tutoring altogether, but perhaps a different approach is needed. What does that look like?

Anna Moss, Founder and Lead Educator at Mind the Test, believes a more personal approach to online tutoring could provide the learning benefits education systems seek, though acknowledges that scale can be an inhibitor to making that improved approach a reality.

Anna’s Thoughts

“When it comes to online tutoring, there are two quite different products that are often conflated. The first is this kind of random assignment, often with 24/7 or pretty frequent coverage where a student logs in whenever they want, they don’t have an appointment, they get assigned whoever happens to be on at that time, the tutor has no idea what the student is going to bring.

Is it going to be a kindergartner doing English? Is it going to be a high school student doing biology? They don’t know. They can’t prepare and you’re going to see effects from that. On the other hand, you have more of what I do with Mind The Test Tutoring, where your tutor is a personal coach or learning designer, essentially, that you meet with regularly every single week, your tutor knows you, they know what you need, and they design everything around you.

Is that scalable at a school district or national level? In my experience, I find it that it’s not that. This is why I haven’t really hired anyone. It’s always it’s me and then I have one intern that I train seriously before I even let them talk with a student. It’s just difficult to scale the real high quality tutoring.

The problem isn’t technology, in my opinion. I teach primarily online with middle and high schoolers. The technology is great, however, for low income students or students who just don’t have a very strong internet connection that can be prohibitive.”

New to MarketScale?

MarketScale is the platform Education Technology companies use to turn their own experts into content like this. Want the short overview?

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

Raptor Technologies has transitioned from visitor management to enhancing student well-being with its StudentSafe platform. This move addresses school district needs for improved behavioral threat assessment. StudentSafe is designed to bolster educational security and student safety.

  • 01Raptor Technologies is expanding into student well-being.
  • 02The StudentSafe platform focuses on behavioral threat assessment.
  • 03StudentSafe responds to demands from school district customers.

Jun 26, 2026

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

New York City schools have mandated that every AI tool undergo a bias and equity review before being deployed within their systems. This move comes amid broader concerns and debates about the role of AI in education, particularly concerning its impact on cognitive development. The education sector is actively assessing the potential benefits and risks associated with AI technologies in classrooms.

  • 01NYC schools require AI tools to pass a bias and equity review.
  • 02Concerns about AI in education include impacts on cognitive development.
  • 03Policymakers are reconsidering the place of AI in classrooms.

Jun 17, 2026

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

Twenty-nine New York City council members are demanding a two-year halt to AI use in the nation's largest school system, citing student data privacy gaps. Simultaneously, California and other states are tightening AI bias-audit requirements for employers, while educators debate a deeper question: whether AI adopted without guardrails erodes the original human thinking it is meant to support.

  • 01Twenty-nine NYC council members sent a letter on June 9, 2026, calling for a two-year AI moratorium in city schools, citing inadequate student data privacy protections in the Department of Education's drafted guidance.
  • 02California's Civil Rights Council AI regulations, effective Oct. 1, 2025, require employers using automated decision systems to retain related data for four years and face heightened litigation risk if they skip bias audits.
  • 03Educators and practitioners are wrestling with a fundamental design question: whether AI functions as a 'calculator'—executing tasks users already understand—or a 'crane' that extends human capacity into genuinely new territory.

Jun 17, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub