Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

For Post-Pandemic Online Tutoring to Work, Educators Must Address Personalization & Scale

Paper’s Online Tutoring Solution rocketed as educators looked for solutions to shore up the learning loss from the pandemic. Paper, a virtual tutoring company, provides an enticing hook: high-quality support for students at a lower price point. Many education systems took the bait, using COVID relief funds to provide students with 24/7 access to on-demand…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Education Technology expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Paper’s Online Tutoring Solution rocketed as educators looked for solutions to shore up the learning loss from the pandemic. Paper, a virtual tutoring company, provides an enticing hook: high-quality support for students at a lower price point. Many education systems took the bait, using COVID relief funds to provide students with 24/7 access to on-demand post-pandemic online tutoring.

Only one problem: students aren’t using the tool. In an article on Chalkbeat, officials in Columbus City Schools found less than 8% of students with access to the service logged on last school year, with half of those only using it once. Columbus school board president, Jennifer Adair, noted one of her students found the experience frustrating and annoying.

Educators recognize the need for such solutions, but if the answer isn’t helping the student, it only compounds the problem. That doesn’t mean educators should abandon online tutoring altogether, but perhaps a different approach is needed. What does that look like?

Anna Moss, Founder and Lead Educator at Mind the Test, believes a more personal approach to online tutoring could provide the learning benefits education systems seek, though acknowledges that scale can be an inhibitor to making that improved approach a reality.

Anna’s Thoughts

“When it comes to online tutoring, there are two quite different products that are often conflated. The first is this kind of random assignment, often with 24/7 or pretty frequent coverage where a student logs in whenever they want, they don’t have an appointment, they get assigned whoever happens to be on at that time, the tutor has no idea what the student is going to bring.

Is it going to be a kindergartner doing English? Is it going to be a high school student doing biology? They don’t know. They can’t prepare and you’re going to see effects from that. On the other hand, you have more of what I do with Mind The Test Tutoring, where your tutor is a personal coach or learning designer, essentially, that you meet with regularly every single week, your tutor knows you, they know what you need, and they design everything around you.

Is that scalable at a school district or national level? In my experience, I find it that it’s not that. This is why I haven’t really hired anyone. It’s always it’s me and then I have one intern that I train seriously before I even let them talk with a student. It’s just difficult to scale the real high quality tutoring.

The problem isn’t technology, in my opinion. I teach primarily online with middle and high schoolers. The technology is great, however, for low income students or students who just don’t have a very strong internet connection that can be prohibitive.”

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Education Technology, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Education Technology Insights

EdTech deals rose 11% while the median funding round shrank 31%

EdTech deals rose 11% while the median funding round shrank 31%

EdTech deals rose 11% over the past year, while the median round shrank 31% and Series A rounds got scarcer. First financings nearly doubled. District and corporate learning buyers now face more seed-funded vendors, just as procurement asks for proof that students use the product and learn from it.

  • 01EdTech now has 37 first financings where it had 19, and a thinner Series A pipeline behind them: more products are starting, and fewer are getting the money to grow up.
  • 02For buyers, a vendor's funding stage is now a working input to due diligence, alongside the evidence file: a seed-funded tool may be excellent and still lack the capital to build integrations and support for a whole district.
  • 03In a two-year trial in 18 Tennessee middle schools, 96% of students tried the Khanmigo AI tutor, yet the median student messaged it on only a third of practice days. Usage logs are a sharper test of AI tutoring than access counts.

Nov 14, 2026

AI training and clear policies went with teacher confidence but not cheating worries, CWU survey finds

AI training and clear policies went with teacher confidence but not cheating worries, CWU survey finds

A Central Washington University survey of 222 high school math and English teachers found clear AI policies and useful training went with higher teacher confidence. Neither showed a link to morale or cheating worries. Districts should judge AI training by confidence and classroom practice, and handle integrity through assignment and tool design.

  • 01In this survey, clear AI policy and useful training went with higher teacher confidence and had no measurable link to morale or cheating worries. To address integrity concerns, the authors suggest focusing on how assignments and assessments are designed, alongside discipline-specific guidance.
  • 02English teachers reported the most integrity worry (83.7%) and also the most confidence teaching responsible AI use (45.5%). Subject may shape AI attitudes more than readiness does, which makes one AI course for every department a weak plan.

Nov 14, 2026

Kazakhstan’s Coursera award: 163,098 recognized university credits

Kazakhstan’s Coursera award: 163,098 recognized university credits

Kazakhstan's Ministry of Science and Higher Education won Coursera's Learning Excellence Award 2026 for building online courses into university programs. Since 2022, Kazakh universities have recognized 163,098 academic credits from Coursera coursework. Credits show what institutions accepted, not just what was bought.

  • 01Kazakh universities have recognized 163,098 academic credits for Coursera coursework since 2022, a harder-to-get benchmark of online learning being accepted into formal academic records.
  • 02A license count shows what was bought; a credit count shows what universities accepted onto a student record. Recognized credits capture a harder step than seats, hours or certificates.
  • 03The Kazakh model transfers most directly where the buyer of seats and the body that grants credit are closely tied; corporate learning teams need their own equivalent of a recognized credit, such as a role requirement or a training record.

Nov 13, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512