Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

For Post-Pandemic Online Tutoring to Work, Educators Must Address Personalization & Scale

Paper’s Online Tutoring Solution rocketed as educators looked for solutions to shore up the learning loss from the pandemic. Paper, a virtual tutoring company, provides an enticing hook: high-quality support for students at a lower price point. Many education systems took the bait, using COVID relief funds to provide students with 24/7 access to on-demand…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Education Technology?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Education Technology coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Paper’s Online Tutoring Solution rocketed as educators looked for solutions to shore up the learning loss from the pandemic. Paper, a virtual tutoring company, provides an enticing hook: high-quality support for students at a lower price point. Many education systems took the bait, using COVID relief funds to provide students with 24/7 access to on-demand post-pandemic online tutoring.

Only one problem: students aren’t using the tool. In an article on Chalkbeat, officials in Columbus City Schools found less than 8% of students with access to the service logged on last school year, with half of those only using it once. Columbus school board president, Jennifer Adair, noted one of her students found the experience frustrating and annoying.

Educators recognize the need for such solutions, but if the answer isn’t helping the student, it only compounds the problem. That doesn’t mean educators should abandon online tutoring altogether, but perhaps a different approach is needed. What does that look like?

Anna Moss, Founder and Lead Educator at Mind the Test, believes a more personal approach to online tutoring could provide the learning benefits education systems seek, though acknowledges that scale can be an inhibitor to making that improved approach a reality.

Anna’s Thoughts

“When it comes to online tutoring, there are two quite different products that are often conflated. The first is this kind of random assignment, often with 24/7 or pretty frequent coverage where a student logs in whenever they want, they don’t have an appointment, they get assigned whoever happens to be on at that time, the tutor has no idea what the student is going to bring.

Is it going to be a kindergartner doing English? Is it going to be a high school student doing biology? They don’t know. They can’t prepare and you’re going to see effects from that. On the other hand, you have more of what I do with Mind The Test Tutoring, where your tutor is a personal coach or learning designer, essentially, that you meet with regularly every single week, your tutor knows you, they know what you need, and they design everything around you.

Is that scalable at a school district or national level? In my experience, I find it that it’s not that. This is why I haven’t really hired anyone. It’s always it’s me and then I have one intern that I train seriously before I even let them talk with a student. It’s just difficult to scale the real high quality tutoring.

The problem isn’t technology, in my opinion. I teach primarily online with middle and high schoolers. The technology is great, however, for low income students or students who just don’t have a very strong internet connection that can be prohibitive.”

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Education Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

Schools are buying AI fast, but their contracts still can’t show it helps

Schools are buying AI fast, but their contracts still can’t show it helps

Schools are rapidly increasing their spending on AI technology, yet there is a lack of evidence in their contracts proving that these tools effectively enhance learning. Utah and Los Angeles Unified School District are implementing screen-time regulations, necessitating a closer scrutiny of AI tools' actual educational benefits. The challenge remains in identifying which AI tools lead to measurable improvements for students.

  • 01AI spending in schools is increasing despite unclear evidence of its educational benefits.
  • 02Screen-time regulations in Utah and LAUSD are prompting schools to evaluate the efficacy of AI tools.
  • 03There is a need for educational tools that can clearly demonstrate an improvement in student learning outcomes.

Aug 29, 2026

Education Department’s 5-question edtech check is now the fastest way to buy

Education Department’s 5-question edtech check is now the fastest way to buy

New federal guidance has streamlined the procurement process for educational technology by requiring evidence of instructional impact, setting usage rules, and showing evidence before renewing contracts. This initiative aims to ensure that technology investments in education are effective and utilized appropriately. The guidance focuses on turning screen time considerations into actionable procurement inquiries.

  • 01New federal guidance requires proving the instructional impact of edtech before procurement.
  • 02Usage rules must be set for educational technology to be considered for purchase.
  • 03Evidence must be shown before renewing edtech contracts to ensure its effective use.

Aug 28, 2026

K-12 AI spending is moving from classroom apps to vetting, policy, and proof

K-12 AI spending is moving from classroom apps to vetting, policy, and proof

K-12 districts are increasing their spending on AI tools, shifting focus from classroom applications to areas like vetting, policy-making, and outcome validation. The primary challenge now lies in the operational aspects of these implementations rather than just acquiring new technologies.

  • 01K-12 districts are shifting AI spending towards vetting, policy-making, and outcome validation instead of classroom applications.
  • 02Operational challenges include developing effective policies and proof of effectiveness for AI tools.
  • 03The transition indicates a move towards more strategic integration of AI in educational environments.

Aug 27, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512