Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

LISTEN: U.S. Agencies Grapple With Student Data Privacy Guidance for Schools

The U.S. Department of Education and the Federal Trade Commission are struggling with how to guide schools on protecting students’ personal information while using educational technology. The information that is provided on devices like iPads, Laptops and other computers allow companies to gain information about their consumers. However, access to this information becomes a…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share
LISTEN: U.S. Agencies Grapple With Student Data Privacy Guidance for Schools

Free workspace

Turn your Education Technology expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

The U.S. Department of Education and the Federal Trade Commission are struggling with

how to guide schools on protecting students’ personal information while using educational

technology.

The information that is provided on devices like iPads, Laptops and other computers allow

companies to gain information about their consumers. However, access to this information

becomes a more difficult subject when that information is being taken from students using these devices for educational purposes.

Thomas B. Pahl, the acting director of the FTC’s bureau of consumer protection said ”Both

the FTC and the Department of Education think further discussion, and perhaps additional

guidance, is warranted.” The discussion should “provide a roadmap for potential next steps

the agencies can take.”

There is no word on when either organization will have further guidance to provide educators and their students on the safety of their personal information when using these devices.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Education Technology, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Education Technology Insights

AI didn't break integrity, it exposed credentialism

AI didn't break integrity, it exposed credentialism

AI has exposed a flaw in higher education that predates generative AI: institutions designed around earning credentials rather than demonstrating learning. Phil Hill argues that better cheating detection won't fix this; instead, schools must rebuild assessments around actual learning outcomes, using approaches like competency-based education, authentic assessment, and dual-stream frameworks that accommodate AI while verifying individual capability.

  • 01Credentialism—treating the credential as the goal rather than evidence of learning—creates incentives for shortcuts that existed before AI; students pursue credentials as boxes to check rather than milestones in learning.
  • 02States like Michigan and Texas are redefining postsecondary credentials to include skill certificates alongside degrees, but broader definitions only matter if assessment measures actual learning, not just completion.
  • 03Effective responses to AI in assessment include competency-based education, authentic assessment methods beyond multiple choice, and two-stream frameworks (like University of Sydney's) that allow AI use in some assessments while preserving proctored individual verification in others.

Oct 6, 2026

Lewis University picks Ellucian Student to support its 2026–2029 strategic plan

Lewis University picks Ellucian Student to support its 2026–2029 strategic plan

Lewis University, which serves more than 7,000 students, will move to Ellucian Student, HCM and Finance. The rollout runs through Project Tailwind, a key part of the university's 2026–2029 Taking Flight strategic plan. The release lists support for a growing population of traditional, online, workforce and lifelong learners among the platform's goals.

  • 01Excelsior University deployed Scholarship Universe early while its Ellucian Student implementation is still ongoing.

Oct 2, 2026

CoSN tells school districts to plan for adoption before they buy new tech

CoSN tells school districts to plan for adoption before they buy new tech

CoSN's 2026 Blaschke Report and companion toolkit give K-12 districts a plan for technology change. Its main point is timing. Districts should define the problem, the success measure and staff workload before procurement, then run rollouts through change champions and a council that reviews significant technology changes.

  • 01CoSN’s toolkit pushes planning before procurement: define the problem, affected groups, timeline, and success measures, and account for competing initiatives and implementation fatigue.
  • 02The toolkit urges leaders to account for competing initiatives and implementation fatigue before procurement or a districtwide rollout.
  • 03After launch, districts should track adoption indicators, review feedback and help requests, keep refresher training going, and conduct a post-implementation review.

Oct 2, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512