Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEnergy

Track to the Future: Best Practices for Bifacial in Modeling Software

On this episode of Track to the Future, host Tyler Kern was joined by Array Vice President, Product Management Jon Sharp and Director of Product Innovation Kyumin Lee to discuss the data-validated best practices for using bifacial solar cells at PV power plants. Monofacial cells were the standard up until the last decade or…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Energy teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Energy?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Energy coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

On this episode of Track to the Future, host Tyler Kern was joined by Array Vice President, Product Management Jon Sharp and Director of Product Innovation Kyumin Lee to discuss the data-validated best practices for using bifacial solar cells at PV power plants.

Monofacial cells were the standard up until the last decade or so, when bifacial cells became more commercially viable.

While reports that bifacial cells boost energy yield by as much as 20-30% are exaggerated, a third-party test conducted by Array in conjunction with PV Lighthouse and CFV Solar found that a 5-10% yield increase was certainly realistic.

“One of the problems with the early days of bifacial testing was that the testing was done by research institutes and universities with small-scale setups. … All those things have resulted in very generous gain numbers in the order of 20 to 30%,” Lee said. “But what we are seeing now and what all the new modeling software are predicting is that for (large-scale installations), the number you should be expecting is in the range of 5 to 10%.”

As a result of this field-tested PV research project, best practices and data inputs have been established that can help utilities, designers, solar developers, and owner/operators more accurately calculate and model power yield across the lifecycle of a utility-scale PV power plant.

These best practices include things like optimal mounting height, width, spacing between rows, parameters to model performance in software solutions, and more that can help PV plants best understand their bifacial modules’ performance.

Further, modeling software like PVsyst can help these groups facilitate project planning and more confidently calculate yield, leading to more efficient bifacial modules and an understanding of how to get the most out of their potential.

“People want to know how to use and how to model bifacial technology,” Sharp said. “So, Array Technologies, in conjunction with (independent labs and modelers) has taken a systematic approach to answering those questions realistically with field data, as well as a modeling tool corroborated with PVsyst modeling.

“The conclusion is that PVsyst can be used with confidence. It’s a tool that will give accurate results if you put the correct information into it.”

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @EnergyMKSL

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Energy starts with a company putting its field engineers, operations leads, and project developers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Developers and operators shortlist on credibility, and your engineers give your sales team something real to send.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Energy Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Energy: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Energy buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Energy expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your field engineers, operations leads, and project developers into the articles, video, and social content Energy buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Energy Insights

GE Vernova is adding HVDC capacity as grids scramble to serve data centers

GE Vernova is adding HVDC capacity as grids scramble to serve data centers

GE Vernova is enhancing its high-voltage direct current (HVDC) capacity as part of efforts to meet increasing demand from data centers. The company is navigating challenges in project timelines caused by equipment lead times, which now dictate power-plant schedules.

  • 01GE Vernova is expanding its HVDC capacity to support increasing data center demands.
  • 02Project timelines for power plants are now dictated by equipment lead times rather than design.
  • 03GE Vernova's initiatives occur amidst growing urgency to upgrade transmission capabilities.

Aug 29, 2026

SMR buyers are now being asked to sign fuel and waste contracts early

SMR buyers are now being asked to sign fuel and waste contracts early

New contracts for Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are requiring buyers to commit to fuel and waste management terms earlier in the procurement process. These upstream nuclear decisions are becoming crucial elements in the initial request for proposal (RFP) stages. The shifts reflect a broader trend toward integrating fuel and waste considerations into the early stages of nuclear projects.

  • 01SMR procurement now often includes early commitments to fuel and waste management contracts.
  • 02Fuel and waste management are becoming integral to the initial RFP stages for nuclear projects.
  • 03Nuclear project decisions are moving upstream, with early consideration of fuel and waste endpoints.

Aug 28, 2026

Sodium-ion and zinc batteries are getting picked for projects that can’t afford HVAC

Sodium-ion and zinc batteries are getting picked for projects that can’t afford HVAC

Sodium-ion and zinc batteries are gaining traction in energy projects where cost constraints and specific environmental conditions, such as cold weather and fire safety, are critical considerations. These battery types offer alternative solutions for grid implementations that require reliability under challenging conditions. Their adoption highlights an evolving energy storage landscape focused on balancing performance, safety, and affordability.

  • 01Sodium-ion and zinc batteries are becoming preferred choices for grid projects constrained by HVAC costs.
  • 02These batteries perform well in cold weather and have a lower fire risk compared to traditional options.
  • 03Their use indicates a shift towards cost-effective, safe energy storage solutions.

Aug 27, 2026

Explore More Energy Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Energy.

Browse Energy Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Energy and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512