Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEnergy

Track to the Future: Best Practices for Bifacial in Modeling Software

On this episode of Track to the Future, host Tyler Kern was joined by Array Vice President, Product Management Jon Sharp and Director of Product Innovation Kyumin Lee to discuss the data-validated best practices for using bifacial solar cells at PV power plants. Monofacial cells were the standard up until the last decade or…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Energy teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Energy?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Energy coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

On this episode of Track to the Future, host Tyler Kern was joined by Array Vice President, Product Management Jon Sharp and Director of Product Innovation Kyumin Lee to discuss the data-validated best practices for using bifacial solar cells at PV power plants.

Monofacial cells were the standard up until the last decade or so, when bifacial cells became more commercially viable.

While reports that bifacial cells boost energy yield by as much as 20-30% are exaggerated, a third-party test conducted by Array in conjunction with PV Lighthouse and CFV Solar found that a 5-10% yield increase was certainly realistic.

“One of the problems with the early days of bifacial testing was that the testing was done by research institutes and universities with small-scale setups. … All those things have resulted in very generous gain numbers in the order of 20 to 30%,” Lee said. “But what we are seeing now and what all the new modeling software are predicting is that for (large-scale installations), the number you should be expecting is in the range of 5 to 10%.”

As a result of this field-tested PV research project, best practices and data inputs have been established that can help utilities, designers, solar developers, and owner/operators more accurately calculate and model power yield across the lifecycle of a utility-scale PV power plant.

These best practices include things like optimal mounting height, width, spacing between rows, parameters to model performance in software solutions, and more that can help PV plants best understand their bifacial modules’ performance.

Further, modeling software like PVsyst can help these groups facilitate project planning and more confidently calculate yield, leading to more efficient bifacial modules and an understanding of how to get the most out of their potential.

“People want to know how to use and how to model bifacial technology,” Sharp said. “So, Array Technologies, in conjunction with (independent labs and modelers) has taken a systematic approach to answering those questions realistically with field data, as well as a modeling tool corroborated with PVsyst modeling.

“The conclusion is that PVsyst can be used with confidence. It’s a tool that will give accurate results if you put the correct information into it.”

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @EnergyMKSL

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Energy starts with a company putting its field engineers, operations leads, and project developers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Developers and operators shortlist on credibility, and your engineers give your sales team something real to send.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Energy Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Energy: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Energy buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Energy expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your field engineers, operations leads, and project developers into the articles, video, and social content Energy buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Energy Insights

The grid investment surge of 2026 is reshaping what utility operators must evaluate now

The grid investment surge of 2026 is reshaping what utility operators must evaluate now

Significant capital investments are being made in grid infrastructure, highlighted by a $1 billion raise for home batteries and a $510 million wind project in Mexico. These investments necessitate utility operators to re-evaluate their strategies and plans to accommodate changes and upgrades. Proper evaluation and adaptation by utility operators are essential to optimize the benefits of this grid investment surge.

  • 01A $1 billion investment in home battery technology is part of the growing grid infrastructure funding.
  • 02A Mexican wind project has secured $510 million, indicating strong investment in renewable energy.
  • 03Utility operators must adapt their strategies to effectively integrate new grid technologies and investments.

Aug 16, 2026

Transmission congestion cost the US grid $12B in 2024, and Texas's data center freeze is making the bottleneck worse

Transmission congestion cost the US grid $12B in 2024, and Texas's data center freeze is making the bottleneck worse

The U.S. grid is facing a significant financial burden due to transmission congestion, amounting to $12 billion in 2024. Texas is exacerbating the issue by pausing data center interconnections amid a large 474 GW queue. The Department of Energy's draft National Transmission Needs Study highlights these challenges.

  • 01Transmission congestion in the U.S. grid is expected to cost $12 billion in 2024.
  • 02Texas has paused data center interconnections, adding pressure to the existing grid bottleneck.
  • 03There is a 474 GW queue for data center interconnections in Texas.

Aug 16, 2026

Anaergia's 98% revenue jump and BHE Montana's EDAM move signal a maturing energy transition economy

Anaergia's 98% revenue jump and BHE Montana's EDAM move signal a maturing energy transition economy

Anaergia experienced a significant 98% increase in revenue, reflecting growth within the waste-to-energy sector. BHE Montana's involvement with EDAM indicates advancements in grid coordination and energy transition efforts. These developments highlight a maturing energy transition economy with tangible commercial outcomes.

  • 01Anaergia reported a 98% increase in revenue, showcasing the growth and potential in the waste-to-energy sector.
  • 02BHE Montana's engagement with EDAM highlights advancements in grid coordination within the energy transition sector.
  • 03The energy transition economy is increasingly delivering measurable commercial results.

Aug 16, 2026

Explore More Energy Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Energy.

Browse Energy Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Energy and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512