Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesFood & Beverage

THE PATH TO NON-GMO CERTIFICATION FOR SUPPLEMENTS

The Rise of GMOs and Consumer Awareness The human tradition of altering living organisms is at least 12,000 years old and has progressed quite rapidly in the last few decades. The first genetically-modified crop approved by the FDA in 1992 was the Flavr Savr tomato 1. For all intents and purposes, the Flavr Savr was the…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Food & Beverage teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Food & Beverage expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

The Rise of GMOs and Consumer Awareness

The human tradition of altering living organisms is at least 12,000 years old and has progressed quite rapidly in the last few decades. The first genetically-modified crop approved by the FDA in 1992 was the Flavr Savr tomato 1. For all intents and purposes, the Flavr Savr was the first product to generate massive awareness about what we now refer to as GMOs (Genetically Modified Organism).

Today, more than 90% of all corn, cotton, and soybean acreage in the United Stated is dedicated to genetically engineered crops 2. Genetically Modified Organisms are created for a variety of reasons, and the most common is to breed plants with an increased resistance to herbicides 3. Other organisms might be modified to help increase production or reduce spoilage.

While this approach has had a worldwide impact, many consumers are worried that it may be too much, too quickly. The movement to reduce the use of GMOs and introduce transparency into the supply chain has reached scale, and organizations in multiple industries are taking steps to certify that their products are created without genetically modified organisms.

The supplement and probiotic markets face especially difficult steps toward achieving these certifications. These products are proprietary, sourced from many suppliers, and extremely cost competitive. This makes many companies reluctant to disclose all their production sources because they could be creating a competitive disadvantage for themselves. It is also often quite difficult to get all the paperwork and verification documentation required from a large group of independent, international suppliers.

New Labeling and Certification Opportunities

In a survey at the University of Illinois, 80% of participants said they found GMOs to be safe due to government regulation and testing, but 39% said that they would pay more for non-GMO products 4. These results are indicative of a rapidly shifting attitude towards GMOs. It is also a good example of why so many businesses are looking to achieve independent certifications that highlight their commitment to product integrity.

Organizations with very health conscious customers are already taking steps to improve customer awareness about GM foods. Whole Foods approved labeling from Nutrasource Diagnostics Inc this past spring 5. The IGEN program looks for GMO proteins and provides 3 tiers of testing: tier 1, what’s in the bottle; tier 2, all major ingredients tested, tier 3, antecedents of ingredients and excipients tested as well.

Another certification body that has recently gained steam is the Non-GMO Project. The Non-GMO Project is a non-profit organization that provides organic agricultural verification to manufacturers in the natural products market. This certification requires that companies meet extremely high standards. This third-party process requires three to six months of extensive testing for high-risk and low-risk ingredients where they are the least processed and potential GMOs would be the most concentrated.

The Supplement Market Joins the Race for Non-GMO Verification

Despite several challenges, supplement manufacturers are quickly taking steps to push for the same sorts of GMO certifications as food producers. Hope Hanley, Vice President of Quality and Regulatory Affairs at Deerland Enzymes & Probiotics says, “The wave of support and demand for non-GMO products is growing at a feverish pace, driven by consumer demand for more natural and organic products. It is heavily evident in foods, beverages, and now in certain aspects of dietary supplements. I fully expect that the pace of the supplement industry will be just as feverish.”

This means that enzymes, probiotics, and vitamins must all meet the sort of rigorous standards set forth by the Non-GMO Project. That is no mean feat; it will require a systematic rethinking of the supply chain from a GMO-based perspective. Customers are interested in labeling that provides accurate and up-to-date certifications about the integrity of the source ingredients and process.

Because supplements can contain so many ingredients from a variety of sources (some labels include up to 50 listed ingredients) it can be extremely laborious for brand owners to meet the stringent demands of independent certifications. There are also several unique and highly researched formulation techniques that top companies can be hesitant to share.

Supplement manufacturers that have been able to achieve certifications from The Non-GMO Project or True North Program only have been able to do so through extensive product and market research. Products with the Non-GMO seal are in an exclusive group of businesses that have proven they are willing to go above and beyond for their customers.

Deerland Enzymes & Probiotics recently earned Non-GMO Project Verification for three of its branded products– DE111®, PreforPro® and ProHydrolase®. This sort of commitment to quality paves the way for increased supplement manufacturer transparency.

If you are interested in learning more about how Deerland is achieving the highest quality standards, visit us here.

1 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/24/booming/you-call-that-a-tomato.html

2 https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/err162.pdf

3 Duke, S.O., & Powles, S.B. (2009). “Glyphosate-resistant crops and weeds: Now and in the future.” AgBioForum, 12(3&4), 346-357.

4 http://www.csus.edu/envs/documents/theses/fall%202014/819.gmo%20labeling.pdf

5 http://www.nutraingredients-usa.com/Markets/NutraSource-Diagnostics-partners-with-Whole-Foods-Market-on-non-GMO-labeling-for-supplements

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Food & Beverage starts with a company putting its plant managers, quality leads, and R&D teams on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Processors and grocery buyers vet suppliers hard, and your operations people are the ones who can satisfy them.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Food & Beverage, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Food & Beverage: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Food & Beverage buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Food & Beverage expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your plant managers, quality leads, and R&D teams into the articles, video, and social content Food & Beverage buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Food & Beverage Insights

Food manufacturers are upgrading existing plants instead of building new ones

Food manufacturers are upgrading existing plants instead of building new ones

Food manufacturers are spending 2026 capital on upgrades inside existing plants, with equipment orders outpacing new construction. PMMI puts US food machinery at $5.1 billion for 2025, rising to $7.1 billion by 2031. Manufacturers are preparing for FSMA 204 in 2028.

  • 01If the equipment-construction gap holds, investment may stay in existing plants as manufacturers prepare for FSMA 204 in 2028.
  • 02New lines win approval before new plants because their return is easier to prove, especially when automation and hygienic design cut cost of goods and shorten sanitation.
  • 03Food and beverage manufacturing is projected to add jobs through 2034, suggesting automation is aimed at getting more output from a workforce that is still growing and hard to staff.

Oct 16, 2026

Why Texas keeps calling a klobasnek a kolache

Why Texas keeps calling a klobasnek a kolache

Middleby's Innovation Kitchen chef builds a sausage-and-cheese klobasnek and a fruit-filled kolache from one brioche-style dough, proofing both for thirty minutes and sending the klobasniky into a Blodgett XR8, to show the two are different pastries. Texas Monthly dates the klobasnek to 1953 in West and the blurring to Kolache Factory's 1982 Houston launch, and bakers in Austin and Utah say customers rarely ask for the right word.

  • 01One slightly sweet brioche-style dough makes both pastries: wrapped around sausage and cheese it is a klobasnek, pressed into a well and filled with jam or ricotta it is a kolache.
  • 02The klobasnek is a Texas invention, dated by Texas Monthly to 1953 at a bakery in West, and the naming blur began when Kolache Factory sold both under one word in Houston from 1982.
  • 03Most shops will keep the sign as is: an Austin shop owner told Texas Monthly one customer in ten thousand insists on the distinction, and a Utah bakery wrote in September 2026 that it knowingly sells klobasniky as kolaches.

Oct 16, 2026

Tailored Bottling's Dearborn plant is built for 750 million cans and bottles a year

Tailored Bottling's Dearborn plant is built for 750 million cans and bottles a year

Tailored Bottling Solutions' Dearborn, Michigan plant is designed for about 750 million beverage units a year but is still ramping up. Only 18 people work there today. Staffing up to three shifts, roughly 45 to 50 workers, sets how quickly beverage brands can use that capacity.

  • 01Dearborn's 750 million-unit design runs on 18 workers today. Three full shifts need about 45 to 50, so headcount is the best public read on when full output arrives.
  • 02The Dearborn plant’s equipment is built for up to 750 million units a year, depending on the ramp.
  • 03TBS says its Miami site, TBS South, is fully operational and has completed large-scale runs and signed multi-year production agreements.

Oct 8, 2026

Explore More Food & Beverage Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Food & Beverage.

Browse Food & Beverage Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Food & Beverage and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512