Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to Industries

Food & Beverage

How Impossible Foods Made Science Edible

Impossible Foods began with a scientist. Dr. Patrick O. Brown, who in 2006 was awarded a Medal of Honor from the American Cancer Society, decided to try his hand at tackling a very different problem: climate change. Brown’s new goal was “to make the global food system sustainable.” How would he do that? By replicating…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Food & Beverage teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

Share
How Impossible Foods Made Science Edible

Impossible Foods began with a scientist.

Dr. Patrick O. Brown, who in 2006 was awarded a Medal of Honor from the American Cancer Society, decided to try his hand at tackling a very different problem: climate change. Brown’s new goal was “to make the global food system sustainable.

How would he do that? By replicating the animal-based foods people love, such as meat and dairy products, with plants. In 2011, Impossible Foods was born. The company’s food-making process produces less CO2, and requires less water, but the greatest difference is in the amount of square footage needed for growing and raising the feed crop.

While a conventional burger can require anywhere from 83-251 square feet of land, the Impossible Burger requires only 4.5. This means that not only is the burger’s production less taxing on resources and less harmful to the environment, it also helps to protect animal populations by avoiding their use as a food source, and also by eliminating the need to raze wildlife habitats to turn them into grazing land.

Of course, the key to any successful product in the consumer-driven food service industry is ultimately reliant on the public actually eating the product.

The key to making its plant-based patty authentic to the taste of ground beef was Impossible Foods’ focus on a molecular substance called “heme”. Heme is present in animals, but also in plants. This is what “makes meat taste like meat” and provides iron. Taking advantage of this discovery allowed the company to ensure that their burger “handles, sizzles, smells, browns and tastes like beef from cows” even though it is entirely plant-based and contains none of the cholesterol or potential slaughterhouse contaminants.

Impossible Foods is setting out to make a difference in the entire food-service industry. Moving forward, its short-term goal is to make at least 1 million pounds of its product per month at its new facility.

Even as the product has become commercially successful, its long-term goal has remained the same since inception: “eliminating the need for animals as a food production technology by 2035.”

This year Impossible Foods’ products have officially been served in more than 3,000 restaurants, which is a significant leap from the 40 restaurants they were in a year ago. If the company were to succeed in even replacing 50% of ground beef from cows with their plant-based beef, researchers at Technical University of Denmark found that it would conservatively “spare the atmosphere of at least 45 million metric tons of carbon…save at least 3.2 trillion gallons of water,” and “release at least 190,000 square kilometers of land now being used for livestock and the crops they consume.”

In Impossible’s 2018 Impact Report, Brown states, “until today, the only technology we’ve known that can turn plants into meat has been animals — but cows, pigs, chicken and fish are terribly inefficient at turning plants into meat. We now know how to make meat better — by making it directly from plants.”

Want to try an impossible burger today? Impossible Foods’ website offers an interactive map of locations in your area that serve the Impossible Burger, including Marriott Hotels, The Cheesecake Factory, and Disney World Parks and Resorts, as well as 140 White Castle locations that now feature an Impossible Slider option. Burgers are also not the only thing coming out of the test kitchen. Impossible Foods’ plant-based meat has also been used by chefs to make “Impossible tacos, pizza, empanadas, Cantonese baos, noodle dishes, kefta, meatballs, nachos, omelets, breakfast sandwiches” and more.

Committing to the creation of a sustainable product, constantly improving the practices used to create that product, giving back to the communities around through food banks, striving to ensure a diverse workforce and creating educational programs all at the same time seems like an insurmountable goal.

This makes it all the more obvious that this company has no fear of the impossible.

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @HospitalityMKSL

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

New to MarketScale?

MarketScale is the platform Food & Beverage companies use to turn their own experts into content like this. Want the short overview?

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Food & Beverage Insights

FDA slows synthetic-dye phase-out as 160 food and ag groups press for USMCA renewal

FDA slows synthetic-dye phase-out as 160 food and ag groups press for USMCA renewal

The FDA has revised its timeline for phasing out petroleum-based synthetic food dyes, slowing a process it announced in April 2025 with a target end date of 2027. Separately, nearly 160 food and agriculture organizations have signed a coordinated letter urging USMCA renewal before the agreement's July 1 review deadline. Additional regulatory fronts — including a California ultra-processed food labeling bill, a bipartisan FDA import-destruction measure, and a USDA domestic fertilizer push — are compounding compliance demands across the food and agriculture sector.

  • 01FDA has revised its synthetic dye phase-out schedule, slowing a voluntary removal program originally targeting six petroleum-based color additives by end of 2027.
  • 02Nearly 160 food and agriculture groups have urged USMCA renewal before the July 1 joint review deadline, warning that inaction could disrupt cross-border supply chains.
  • 03California's AB 2244 and a bipartisan federal bill targeting unsafe food imports are adding new compliance layers for food manufacturers and retailers.

Jun 17, 2026

FDA slows synthetic-dye phase-out as 160 food and ag groups push to renew USMCA

FDA slows synthetic-dye phase-out as 160 food and ag groups push to renew USMCA

The FDA's April 2025 voluntary initiative to phase out petroleum-based synthetic dyes from the U.S. food supply has generated a wave of corporate commitments, with major brands targeting 2026–2027 deadlines. However, Consumer Reports found that many large food companies have yet to pledge any changes, even where natural alternatives are already used abroad. Meanwhile, broader regulatory shifts — including a USDA reorganization affecting food assistance programs and new legislative proposals on food labeling and import safety — are reshaping the operating environment for food and beverage manufacturers.

  • 01The FDA is working with industry to eliminate six certified petroleum-based color additives from the U.S. food supply by the end of 2027, after revoking authorization for Red No. 3 earlier in 2025.
  • 02A March 2026 Consumer Reports survey found 72 percent of U.S. adults are at least somewhat concerned about synthetic dyes, and 66 percent say companies should be required to phase them out — yet many major brands have made no commitments.
  • 03Separate regulatory pressures are mounting: California advanced a non-ultra-processed food labeling bill, Congress moved bipartisan legislation to let the FDA destroy unsafe food imports, and the USDA reorganized its food nutrition administration amid leadership changes.

Jun 17, 2026

The Produce Distribution Industry Needs Flexibility, Empathy, and a New Generation of Talent

The Produce Distribution Industry Needs Flexibility, Empathy, and a New Generation of Talent

Produce distributors are facing tightening margins and supply chain pressures that demand more flexible operations and empathetic leadership. AJ Krow argues that attracting and retaining a new generation of talent is critical to the industry's long-term survival. Modernizing workplace culture and rethinking traditional distribution practices are central to meeting these challenges.

  • 01Produce distributors must adapt operations to withstand tightening margins and supply chain volatility.
  • 02Empathetic leadership and flexible workplace culture are essential to attracting younger talent to the industry.
  • 03A generational shift in the workforce requires the produce distribution sector to rethink recruiting and retention strategies.

May 1, 2025

Explore More Food & Beverage Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Food & Beverage.

Browse Food & Beverage Hub