Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to Industries

Food & Beverage

How Pepsi Drinkers are Empowering Sustainable Farming

Pepsico recently announced its intentions to increase the company’s pursuit of sustainable farming. Watch or read below as Jim Andrews, Pepsico’s Chief Sustainability Officer, talks about the company’s plans to eliminate at least three million tons of emissions by 2030.   Host: You, of course, know PepsiCo as the soda snack giant, but the New…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Food & Beverage teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

Share

Pepsico recently announced its intentions to increase the company’s pursuit of sustainable farming. Watch or read below as Jim Andrews, Pepsico’s Chief Sustainability Officer, talks about the company’s plans to eliminate at least three million tons of emissions by 2030.

Host: You, of course, know PepsiCo as the soda snack giant, but the New York based company has a very large agricultural footprint, seven million acres it uses to grow its crops and ingredients today. While the company is announcing its long term plan for regenerative agriculture, in other words, growing crops in a way that replenishes the earth. PepsiCo says the effort will eliminate at least three million tons of emissions by 2030. Let’s talk about it more, Jim Andrews, pepsico, EVP of beyond the bottle and chief sustainability officer. Jim, I mean, wow, big targets. How costly is this to do, and how much of a reward is it to?

Andrews: Very well, thank you. And, you know, this is just intrinsically part of our business, as you said, we have a very large agricultural footprint and a lot of people don’t really know that PepsiCo is a whole lot more than a beverage company. Food and snacks are about 55% of our revenue and probably 2/3 of what we do starts in the ground.

So these activities are really part and parcel of making us a stronger, more resilient company. The great thing is that as we move forward in this, you know, farmers are business people and they are looking for. How do I reduce risk and how do I increase my income?

And these practices do both of those things. They help farmers be more resilient, better able to respond to climate change, but also they’re able to increase yields and reduce input costs, which helps their bottom line. So these are really positive practices for the farmers and ultimately throw flow all the way through the value chain.

Host: Well, when we talk about the bottom line, though, Jim, I mean, there are, to a certain extent, some upfront costs or at least some early costs involved in making this sort of transition. How do you sort of balance that out, not only for the farmers, but, of course, on the other end of the equation for consumers, is there a cost dynamic here that we should be aware of and that maybe we should factor into the general outlook?

“Over time, we’ve seen that these practices actually have a very positive impact on the economics for the farmer.” – Jim Andrews, Pepsico’s Chief Sustainability Officer

Andrews: The costs are up front, as you said, there. It’s really about how do we take risk out for the farmer, because over time, we’ve seen that these practices actually have a very positive impact on the economics for the farmer. And so we have a number of programs where we help reduce that risk for the farmer by my cost sharing.

So we’ll give them an amount per acre for some of their acorns. And what we find is that the results are so good that they frequently go far beyond what we had originally shared costs on because they see the benefits. And so it’s a real productivity increase for them and allows them to reduce the input cost and be more resilient, which is ultimately about taking risk out.

So it’s very positive. And that little up front is just in transition that, as I say, we find really good pickup as we move forward before you get to that pick up moving forward, that initial cost that you discussed, you passing that on to the consumer. The these costs are very positive to the farmer there.

We have not passed any of these costs at this point on to the consumers because we see the results that get driven through our agricultural chain. If you think about a brand like walkers, you know, we’re actually moving to carbon neutral potatoes, which is our big chip brand in the UK. And there.

We’re actually moving to carbon neutral potatoes where we take some of the waste products, use it for fertilizer back to the farms, reduces greenhouse gas emissions and also really creates that circularity. So the benefits are really multifold across the whole value chain.

Host: I’m interested in how much the sustainability really actually drives customer demand, though. Could you charge a premium price, for example, by demonstrating such carbon neutral potatoes, for example?

Andrews: You know, consumers, when it comes to food and beverage, consumers are always looking for a couple of things. They’re looking for great taste. And that’s obviously where as pepsico, whether it’s on our beverage products or our food products, you know, we really pride ourselves. We also have availability being where consumers want the products affordability always really important. And there’s a increasing group of consumers, and I must say importantly, our customers, our retailers who are very interested in sustainability. And as you know from all of your work, what are companies really doing to lean in to that that purpose, those things that go beyond business as usual? And so when you put that whole package together, we’re finding you know, you saw we just announced earnings recently. Business has been very strong. And it’s a combination of all of these things.

*Bloomberg contributed to this content

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @MarketScale

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

You, of course, know PepsiCo as the soda snack giant, but the New York based company has a very large agricultural footprint, seven million acres it uses to grow its crops and ingredients today. While the company is announcing its long term plan for regenerative agriculture, in other words, growing crops in a way that replenishes the earth. PepsiCo says the effort will eliminate at least three million tons of emissions by 2030. Let's talk about it more, Jim Andrew, pepsico, EVP of beyond the bottle and chief sustainability officer. Jim, I mean, wow, big targets. How costly is this to do, and how much of a reward is it to. Very well, thank you. And, you know, this is just intrinsically part of our business, as you said, we have a very large agricultural footprint and a lot of people don't really know that PepsiCo is a whole lot more than a beverage company. Food and snacks are about 55% of our revenue and probably 2/3 of what we do starts in the ground. So these activities are really part and parcel of making us a stronger, more resilient company. The great thing is that as we move forward in this, you know, farmers are business people and they are looking for. How do I reduce risk and how do I increase my income? And these practices do both of those things. They help farmers be more resilient, better able to respond to climate change, but also they're able to increase yields and reduce input costs, which helps their bottom line. So these are really positive practices for the farmers and ultimately throw flow all the way through the value chain. Well, when we talk about the bottom line, though, Jim, I mean, there are, to a certain extent, some upfront costs or at least some early costs involved in making this sort of transition. How do you sort of balance that out, not only for the farmers, but, of course, on the other end of the equation for consumers, is there a cost dynamic here that we should be aware of and that maybe we should factor into the general outlook? The costs are up front, as you said, there. It's really about how do we take risk out for the farmer, because over time, we've seen that these practices actually have a very positive impact on the economics for the farmer. And so we have a number of programs where we help reduce that risk for the farmer by my cost sharing. So we'll give them an amount per acre for some of their acorns. And what we find is that the results are so good that they frequently go far beyond what we had originally shared costs on because they see the benefits. And so it's a real productivity increase for them and allows them to reduce the input cost and be more resilient, which is ultimately about taking risk out. So it's very positive. And that little up front is just in transition that, as I say, we find really good pickup as we move forward before you get to that pick up moving forward, that initial cost that you discussed, you passing that on to the consumer. The these costs are very positive to the farmer there. We have not passed any of these costs at this point on to the consumers because we see the results that get driven through our agricultural chain. If you think about a brand like walkers, you know, we're actually moving to carbon neutral potatoes, which is our big chip brand in the UK. And there. We're actually moving to carbon neutral potatoes where we take some of the waste products, use it for fertilizer back to the farms, reduces greenhouse gas emissions and also really creates that circularity. So the benefits are really multifold across the whole value chain. I know it well, walkers, that here in London at the moment, I'm interested in how much the sustainability really actually drives customer demand, though. Can you. Could you charge a premium price, for example, by demonstrating such carbon neutral potatoes, for example? You know, consumers, when it comes to food and beverage, consumers are always looking for a couple of things. They're looking for great taste. And that's obviously where as pepsico, whether it's on our beverage products or our food products, you know, we really pride ourselves. We also have availability being where consumers want the products affordability always really important. And there's a increasing group of consumers, and I must say importantly, our customers, our retailers who are very interested in sustainability. And as you know from all of your work, what are companies really doing to lean in to that that purpose, those things that go beyond business as usual? And so when you put that whole package together, we're finding you know, you saw we just announced earnings recently. Business has been very strong. And it's a combination of all of these things.

New to MarketScale?

MarketScale is the platform Food & Beverage companies use to turn their own experts into content like this. Want the short overview?

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Food & Beverage Insights

FDA slows synthetic-dye phase-out as 160 food and ag groups press for USMCA renewal

FDA slows synthetic-dye phase-out as 160 food and ag groups press for USMCA renewal

The FDA has revised its timeline for phasing out petroleum-based synthetic food dyes, slowing a process it announced in April 2025 with a target end date of 2027. Separately, nearly 160 food and agriculture organizations have signed a coordinated letter urging USMCA renewal before the agreement's July 1 review deadline. Additional regulatory fronts — including a California ultra-processed food labeling bill, a bipartisan FDA import-destruction measure, and a USDA domestic fertilizer push — are compounding compliance demands across the food and agriculture sector.

  • 01FDA has revised its synthetic dye phase-out schedule, slowing a voluntary removal program originally targeting six petroleum-based color additives by end of 2027.
  • 02Nearly 160 food and agriculture groups have urged USMCA renewal before the July 1 joint review deadline, warning that inaction could disrupt cross-border supply chains.
  • 03California's AB 2244 and a bipartisan federal bill targeting unsafe food imports are adding new compliance layers for food manufacturers and retailers.

Jun 17, 2026

FDA slows synthetic-dye phase-out as 160 food and ag groups push to renew USMCA

FDA slows synthetic-dye phase-out as 160 food and ag groups push to renew USMCA

The FDA's April 2025 voluntary initiative to phase out petroleum-based synthetic dyes from the U.S. food supply has generated a wave of corporate commitments, with major brands targeting 2026–2027 deadlines. However, Consumer Reports found that many large food companies have yet to pledge any changes, even where natural alternatives are already used abroad. Meanwhile, broader regulatory shifts — including a USDA reorganization affecting food assistance programs and new legislative proposals on food labeling and import safety — are reshaping the operating environment for food and beverage manufacturers.

  • 01The FDA is working with industry to eliminate six certified petroleum-based color additives from the U.S. food supply by the end of 2027, after revoking authorization for Red No. 3 earlier in 2025.
  • 02A March 2026 Consumer Reports survey found 72 percent of U.S. adults are at least somewhat concerned about synthetic dyes, and 66 percent say companies should be required to phase them out — yet many major brands have made no commitments.
  • 03Separate regulatory pressures are mounting: California advanced a non-ultra-processed food labeling bill, Congress moved bipartisan legislation to let the FDA destroy unsafe food imports, and the USDA reorganized its food nutrition administration amid leadership changes.

Jun 17, 2026

The Produce Distribution Industry Needs Flexibility, Empathy, and a New Generation of Talent

The Produce Distribution Industry Needs Flexibility, Empathy, and a New Generation of Talent

Produce distributors are facing tightening margins and supply chain pressures that demand more flexible operations and empathetic leadership. AJ Krow argues that attracting and retaining a new generation of talent is critical to the industry's long-term survival. Modernizing workplace culture and rethinking traditional distribution practices are central to meeting these challenges.

  • 01Produce distributors must adapt operations to withstand tightening margins and supply chain volatility.
  • 02Empathetic leadership and flexible workplace culture are essential to attracting younger talent to the industry.
  • 03A generational shift in the workforce requires the produce distribution sector to rethink recruiting and retention strategies.

May 1, 2025

Explore More Food & Beverage Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Food & Beverage.

Browse Food & Beverage Hub