Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Best Practices for Sentinel Events: What Every Healthcare Organization Needs to Know

In any healthcare environment, patient safety is always top of mind. Each staff member is responsible for their own actions. Administrators are too, especially when those actions include reacting to a safety concern raised by an employee. To ensure that healthcare organizations have a high-reliability culture, the Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare published a…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

In any healthcare environment, patient safety is always top of mind. Each staff member is responsible for their own actions. Administrators are too, especially when those actions include reacting to a safety concern raised by an employee. To ensure that healthcare organizations have a high-reliability culture, the Joint Commission Center for Transforming Healthcare published a report, “Sentinel Event Alert 60: Developing a Reporting Culture: Learning from Close Calls and Hazardous Conditions.” 1 The Joint Commission issued this report to encourage a reporting culture where swift action is taken to remedy unsafe conditions.

What Is a Sentinel Event?

The Joint Commission’s mission is “to continuously improve health care for the public, in collaboration with other stakeholders, by evaluating health care organizations and inspiring them to excel in providing safe and effective care of the highest quality and value.2 The Joint Commission defines a sentinel event as an unanticipated event in a healthcare setting resulting in death or serious injury, physical or psychological, not related to natural causes or the patient’s illness. The Joint Commission identifies sentinel events in its accreditation policies to assist with root cause analysis and the development of new preventive measures. Accredited organizations are required to define sentinel events for their own care system and implement monitoring procedures and a process for root cause analysis.

Standards Must Be in Place to Respond to a Sentinel Event

Should a sentinel event occur, any accredited healthcare organization must have a process to respond. Causal factors need to be analyzed, focusing on the system holistically. An “action plan” should be put in place for potential improvements to decrease the chance of the event happening again. The Joint Commission encourages organizations to report any sentinel event, but it’s not required. The organization will have to create root cause analysis and an action plan within 45 days of the event. You can also consult with The Joint Commission on initiating the root cause analysis and action plan. If the event was due to a medical device defect, then an organization must report the incident to the Food and Drug Administration within 10 days.

There are benefits to reporting the event that can be of help to other organizations. A reported event is added to the database which other facilities have access to, providing vital information that could help to prevent a similar event from occurring at their organizations.

Sentinel Event Standards

Within the Performance Improvement and Leadership chapters of the accreditation manual, there are standards for the expectations regarding the internal identification and management of sentinel events.

With the organization’s definition of the sentinel event, it must include the specific events that would be reviewed under the Sentinel Event Policy. Following a sentinel event, the organization must begin its investigation by determining root cause analysis, then develop its plan and identify ways to reduce future risk. After the standards are implemented, they are closely monitored to ascertain their viability.

Reporting Is a Key Element of Sentinel Event Management

In order to manage sentinel events, your culture must be one that has adopted reporting. Only with reporting will you be able to truly understand the causes of a particular event and prevent similar events from happening again. The four Es of a Reporting Culture include:3

  1. Establish trust: there can be no culture of reporting without trust; leaders must show their continued commitment to safety and governance should support this as well.
  2. Encourage reporting: this means that reporting is accessible by all staff, easy to use, and delivers data analysis in a timely fashion. Encouragement also means that staff receives feedback so that they know the action is being taken when reports are made. The organization should also define the types of events that should be reported.
  3. Eliminate fear of punishment: ensure that your staff knows that there is no retaliation or punishment for reporting safety concerns. All staff, regardless of position, should be held to the same standards.
  4. Examine errors: refer to the data compiled and use it to identify the highest risk situations and take action. Data is also used to celebrate staff when they are successful. Data helps strengthen the safety program and the culture of reporting.

The Joint Commission also offers resources and support so you can continue to enhance a culture of reporting within your organization.4

https://www.alimed.com/_resources/common/userfiles/file/infographics/AliMed_ReportingCulture-Infographic.pdf

References

  1. https://www.jointcommission.org/
  2. https://www.jointcommission.org
  3. https://www.jointcommission.org/
  4. https://www.jointcommission.org/

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Healthcare Insights

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are choosing alliances over mergers, per a July McDermott Will & Schulte analysis and four July deals tracked by Becker's Hospital Review. St. Christopher's, Nemours, Jefferson and Temple signed a nonbinding alliance letter; Palomar UC San Diego Health launched July 1. Ownership stays put; governance, purchasing and outpatient investment absorb the change.

  • 01In an alliance, the contract does the integrating that an org chart does in a merger: McDermott Will & Schulte says governance design, exclusivity, antitrust review, community commitments and exit rights all have to be settled before signing.
  • 02Purchasing is now explicitly on the table in at least one no-ownership deal, the St. Peter's Health and Billings Clinic-Logan Health talks in Montana, which means shared supply contracts can arrive without a change of control.

Sep 19, 2026

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

An Ophthalmology Times commentary by T.Y. Alvin Liu, Ferdinand Hui and Phillip Phan sorts eye patients into three telemedicine tiers by clinical need. Patients needing regular OCT scans benefit less unless a home device can send the image. Video tools already sit inside Epic and Cerner; the deciding purchase for retina clinics is the imaging device in the patient's living room.

  • 01The dividing line for eye telemedicine is imaging, not video: patients who need regular OCT scans benefit less from remote visits unless a device at home can send the scan, so a video license alone shifts few of those encounters.
  • 02The provider-side requirement, a HIPAA-compliant secured video platform, was already built into Epic and Cerner by 2020; the patient-side requirements (1.5 MB up and down bandwidth, a quiet private room, comfort with the technology) sit outside the health system's control and are the ones worth screening for at scheduling.
  • 03Self-administered home color fundus photography for tracking non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy was named as the nearer route into retina telemedicine; home OCT for wet AMD is the harder gate and the device to watch.

Sep 19, 2026

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Wolters Kluwer Health argues value-based care software is judged on whether customers hit incentive thresholds and avoid penalties. A Fierce Healthcare-reported survey it cites puts value-based care at a quarter or more of revenue for 30% of organizations. The analysis is a vendor publication that ends by pitching its own UpToDate Connect API.

  • 01The sharper question for any population health or care coordination platform is whether it changes what a clinician does at the moment of decision, or only reports afterward what happened. Wolters Kluwer's reading of the evidence is that many platforms still struggle with the first.
  • 02Vendors selling into value-based contracts now face a build-or-license decision on clinical content, because Wolters Kluwer names current, trusted content, consistent clinician adoption across sites, and a traceable link from guidance to quality metrics as the three hard problems.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512