Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Clinical Services: To outsource or To Not Outsource, That Is the Question

When providers think of purchased services, their minds typically go to facility support, IT, and ancillary services. However, this  scope is too limited and doesn’t encompass the full breadth of what falls under the definition of purchased services. The fact is, there are over 250 clinical services that are categorized as a purchased service including pharmacy compounding…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

When providers think of purchased services, their minds typically go to facility support, IT, and ancillary services. However, this scope is too limited and doesn’t encompass the full breadth of what falls under the definition of purchased services. The fact is, there are over 250 clinical services that are categorized as a purchased service including pharmacy compounding services, dialysis services, imaging services, and neurology services.

Another way to describe this is to say that all “clinical services” could potentially be a purchased service, but are not necessarily the the most commonly known purchased services categories such as lawn care, medical waste disposal, or courier services that hospital administrators typically outsource. Because clinical services can be performed by skilled clinicians within the hospital, it can be challenging for healthcare organization leaders to determine whether or not outsourcing these types of services will affect quality of care and ultimately the total costs to serve patients.

Let’s take a closer look at the items found under the “clinical services” umbrella and identify both the questions to ask and typical tasks to perform to determine whether or not they should be outsourced. As with all decisions involving purchased services, but perhaps even more so with services that fall under the clinical category, the goal of choosing to outsource, is to help your healthcare organization save money while continuing to provide the high standard of care your patients expect.

  1. Start by comparing costs: Clinical services, like other purchased services categories, must be either outsourced or performed by facility personnel. Many providers should begin by comparing department profit and loss versus an outsourced firm’s cost model to determine what makes the most sense for each given department. There will likely not be a one-size-fits-all
  1. Perform clinical oversight: Though other purchased services areas may need little oversight, clinical services that are outsourced will need regular and rigorous clinical oversight to ensure they run smoothly and consistently attain the desired results. Department leaders in clinical areas must perform regular analysis of an outsourced firm’s results to determine whether their costs and patient outcomes have changed. Incorporating these data points into regularly scheduled Value Analysis Team (VAT) meetings will ensure consistent quality and outcomes.
  1. Find out if your outsourced firm has best-in-class results:Providers that outsource clinical areas are attempting to obtain the scale and best practices of the outsourced firm. Therefore, it is imperative that clinical leaders and supply chain leaders leverage the data and scale of their outsourced firm to achieve best-in-class results and continuous improvement. Don’t settle for “good enough.”
  1. Schedule regular reviews: Setting an outsourced service on autopilot won’t yield stellar results. Partnering with the outsourced service provider to review optimization opportunities and key performance data will help with continuous improvement and determine that the value of outsourcing isn’t falling away over time.

Every year, hospitals in America waste more than $50 billion on healthcare purchased services—including clinical services. Uncover millions in savings easier and faster with Valify. Valify is the only 100% dedicated web-based solution that allows healthcare organizations to quickly identify, benchmark and track savings in hospital purchased services.

Read more at getvalify.com

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Healthcare Insights

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are choosing alliances over mergers, per a July McDermott Will & Schulte analysis and four July deals tracked by Becker's Hospital Review. St. Christopher's, Nemours, Jefferson and Temple signed a nonbinding alliance letter; Palomar UC San Diego Health launched July 1. Ownership stays put; governance, purchasing and outpatient investment absorb the change.

  • 01In an alliance, the contract does the integrating that an org chart does in a merger: McDermott Will & Schulte says governance design, exclusivity, antitrust review, community commitments and exit rights all have to be settled before signing.
  • 02Purchasing is now explicitly on the table in at least one no-ownership deal, the St. Peter's Health and Billings Clinic-Logan Health talks in Montana, which means shared supply contracts can arrive without a change of control.

Sep 19, 2026

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

An Ophthalmology Times commentary by T.Y. Alvin Liu, Ferdinand Hui and Phillip Phan sorts eye patients into three telemedicine tiers by clinical need. Patients needing regular OCT scans benefit less unless a home device can send the image. Video tools already sit inside Epic and Cerner; the deciding purchase for retina clinics is the imaging device in the patient's living room.

  • 01The dividing line for eye telemedicine is imaging, not video: patients who need regular OCT scans benefit less from remote visits unless a device at home can send the scan, so a video license alone shifts few of those encounters.
  • 02The provider-side requirement, a HIPAA-compliant secured video platform, was already built into Epic and Cerner by 2020; the patient-side requirements (1.5 MB up and down bandwidth, a quiet private room, comfort with the technology) sit outside the health system's control and are the ones worth screening for at scheduling.
  • 03Self-administered home color fundus photography for tracking non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy was named as the nearer route into retina telemedicine; home OCT for wet AMD is the harder gate and the device to watch.

Sep 19, 2026

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Wolters Kluwer Health argues value-based care software is judged on whether customers hit incentive thresholds and avoid penalties. A Fierce Healthcare-reported survey it cites puts value-based care at a quarter or more of revenue for 30% of organizations. The analysis is a vendor publication that ends by pitching its own UpToDate Connect API.

  • 01The sharper question for any population health or care coordination platform is whether it changes what a clinician does at the moment of decision, or only reports afterward what happened. Wolters Kluwer's reading of the evidence is that many platforms still struggle with the first.
  • 02Vendors selling into value-based contracts now face a build-or-license decision on clinical content, because Wolters Kluwer names current, trusted content, consistent clinician adoption across sites, and a traceable link from guidance to quality metrics as the three hard problems.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512