Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Cloud-Based vs. In-House Electronic Health Records

Health organizations have been leveraging technology for some time to improve patient experiences and make workflows more efficient, and the central hub for clinicians to record, store and share data is their EHR. Many factors need to be considered when choosing the right EHR, including whether it’s cloud-based or on-site. The biggest difference between the…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Health organizations have been leveraging technology for some time to improve patient experiences and make workflows more efficient, and the central hub for clinicians to record, store and share data is their EHR.

Many factors need to be considered when choosing the right EHR, including whether it’s cloud-based or on-site. The biggest difference between the two is where the data lives. In cloud-based EHRs, patient records live in an internet-based, on-demand network. On-premise EHRs require data to be hosted locally and housed on-site, which requires significant hardware investment.

So, which is right for your organization?

Cloud-Based EHRs Offer Many Advantages

The cloud has become a vital tool in how organizations use technology, and it provides many benefits for those who adopt it. Cloud-based EHRs are relatively popular, and a study from HIMSS revealed that about two-thirds of healthcare organizations use the cloud or cloud services. So, why have so many migrated to cloud-based EHRs?

The cloud presents multiple opportunities for healthcare entities to reduce costs, enhance security and improve interoperability.

Reduce Costs and Capital Investment

Setting up a new EHR can require substantial capital depending on your requirements, especially if you are responsible for hardware and upgrades. With a cloud-based EHR, you’ll reduce costs associated with EHR implementation, management, and storage.

Every time a new upgrade occurs, you won’t incur additional costs to enhance your servers. With the cloud, you are only paying for the storage that you need, and you don’t need additional IT resources.

Enhance Data Security

Keeping healthcare data safe is paramount and required by HIPAA and other privacy regulations. Moving to the cloud improves the security of your data. Cloud service providers deliver highly secure and well-protected data centers that easily thwart cyberattacks, mostly through tactics like encryption.

Having an on-site server means you are completely responsible for its security, which may be a hard task to ensure, especially for small healthcare entities that don’t have the resources.

Improve Interoperability for Better Patient Outcomes

The world of healthcare data places substantial emphasis on that the ability to share that data across applications. Healthcare interoperability is critical in the modern world, enabling greater access to information to improve patient care.

This data sharing must be secure and seamless, which is better accomplished by using the cloud. Interoperability boosts clinician satisfaction with EHRs, which is much harder to execute with on-premise EHRs.

On-premise applications suffer from poor usability, hampering the ability to exchange data. Cloud-based applications can be a huge help in overcoming interoperability barriers, which, in turn, improves patient outcomes.

Your EHR Should Deliver Advantages, Not Obstacles

Your EHR solution is one of your most valuable tools. Being stuck with on-premise systems is keeping you from realizing multiple benefits.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

Interchangeable biosimilars are getting approved faster, and Wezlana shows why

Interchangeable biosimilars are getting approved faster, and Wezlana shows why

The FDA approved Wezlana (ustekinumab-auub) as a biosimilar to and interchangeable with Stelara for multiple inflammatory diseases, which means it may be substituted without consulting the prescriber, subject to state pharmacy laws. A Springer analysis reported 26 interchangeable biosimilars approved since 2020 and said average approval timelines decreased from 798 days for applications dated in 2020 to 364 days for applications dated in 2024. The operational pressure shifts to formulary, payer, and specialty pharmacy workflow design.

  • 01Interchangeability is becoming the default ask, not an afterthought: Springer found 17 of 26 approvals pursued interchangeability concurrently, which changes how buyers should time contracting and conversions.
  • 02Springer reported average approval timelines decreased from 798 days for applications dated in 2020 to 364 days for applications dated in 2024, which can compress planning windows for monitoring and implementation.
  • 03A new interchangeable ustekinumab option means the hard work is no longer clinical, it is operational: NDC mapping, EMR preference lists, substitution rules by state, and patient communications decide whether savings show up.

Sep 8, 2026

AAO-HNSF hearing loss guideline moves audiograms and amplification into primary care

AAO-HNSF’s new age-related hearing loss guideline calls for screening adults starting at age 50 and escalating to otoscopy, audiogram, and appropriately fit amplification. It shifts hearing loss from “patient complaint” to a routine primary-care workflow. The pressure shows up in audiology capacity, referral design, and documentation standards.

  • 01Screening at age 50 becomes a repeatable workflow, so capacity planning shifts from episodic ENT referrals to steady primary-care volume, especially where annual wellness visits are a dominant access point.
  • 02The guideline’s escalation sequence, screen, otoscopy, audiogram, amplification, then cochlear implant candidacy evaluation, creates a measurable funnel that health systems can instrument in the EHR and manage like any other pathway.
  • 03Asymmetric loss remains a separate trigger for MRI in many settings, and 2026 pre-proof work using NHANES and SEER highlights why imaging criteria choices can swing scan volume, a budgeting and radiology access issue, not a clinical footnote.

Sep 7, 2026

ADHA shifts My Health Record to multi-supplier ops as Accenture signs new 3-year contract

ADHA shifts My Health Record to multi-supplier ops as Accenture signs new 3-year contract

Accenture will keep supporting Australia’s My Health Record under a new three-year contract. ADHA is moving the platform to a multi-supplier operating model. The shift raises questions about shared integration discipline, tooling, and accountability when changes hit production.

  • 01Multi-supplier delivery is spreading across national-scale health platforms, as ADHA's My Health Record shift shows, moving risk from vendor selection to integration, runbooks, and accountability.
  • 02GenAI model upgrades are arriving with healthcare-specific claims, but the procurement work moves to evidence, safety controls, and monitoring once models sit inside clinical workflows.
  • 03Embedded AI expands the cyber asset inventory problem: if teams cannot discover the AI components across endpoints and devices, they cannot reliably secure or audit them.

Sep 7, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512