Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

DESIGN TRANSFER: A PROCESS NOT A SINGULAR EVENT

In the development process for medical devices, there comes a point when products transfer from design to production. Often this step doesn’t go as smoothly as it should and the project budget and schedule are adversely impacted. Companies may view design transfer as a one-time event, rather than an essential part of an ongoing process….

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

In the development process for medical devices, there comes a point when products transfer from design to production. Often this step doesn’t go as smoothly as it should and the project budget and schedule are adversely impacted. Companies may view design transfer as a one-time event, rather than an essential part of an ongoing process.

During the product development process, the Research and Development (R&D) team is under a tight deadline. They may not have the necessary resources or take sufficient time to create proper documentation. Team members may need to make decisions quickly without fully considering how they could take proactive steps to ensure design transfer will go more smoothly. Subject matter experts on the team may only focus on critical design decisions required to make the product work, without regard for manufacturing. Let’s take a look at some ways to improve design transfer.

Look at Design Transfer as a Process Rather than a Single Event

Design transfer is an integral part of the product development process, from conception through final manufacture. Highly reliable, cost-efficient medical devices require proper design transfer, and that starts with Design for Manufacturability (DFM) and Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA). In DFM and DFMA the focus is not only on the design itself, but also on the assembly method, ensuring manufacturing readiness for building Beta units, pre-production clinical units, and the pilot program. When the R&D team considers these factors and performs in-process testing, it can significantly improve product quality and reduce the overall cost of manufacturing.

Using DFMA 

The goal of DFMA is simple: to transfer product design into viable, robust production methods. To succeed, the team must establish and maintain procedures that ensure the device design translates into production specifications, including final test acceptance. The transfer should negate and/or identify remaining risks such as single-sourcing, long lead items, build timelines, and line/tooling capacity.

A Design Ready for Transfer:

  • Can be built reliably using known and proven manufacturing and assembly processes
  • Includes supporting cell/line qualifications through manufacturing validations such as Operational Qualification (OQ) and Performance Qualification (PQ)
  • Specifies and documents any inspection aids, assembly fixtures, and custom tools required for manufacture
  • Confirms completed agency testing and production target hardware meets regulatory requirements such as FDA, UL, and CE
  • Includes a complete product Bill of Material (BOM) that has been fully costed up to the customer Stock Keeping Unit (SKU) level
  • Includes packaging, labeling, and Instructions for Use (IFU)

At Sunrise Labs, we see Design Transfer as an integral process beginning early in the life of a product with many crucial steps for success. Communication between key stakeholders early and often is critical to turn innovative ideas into commercial medical devices.

Read more at sunriselabs.com

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

Interchangeable biosimilars are getting approved faster, and Wezlana shows why

Interchangeable biosimilars are getting approved faster, and Wezlana shows why

The FDA approved Wezlana (ustekinumab-auub) as a biosimilar to and interchangeable with Stelara for multiple inflammatory diseases, which means it may be substituted without consulting the prescriber, subject to state pharmacy laws. A Springer analysis reported 26 interchangeable biosimilars approved since 2020 and said average approval timelines decreased from 798 days for applications dated in 2020 to 364 days for applications dated in 2024. The operational pressure shifts to formulary, payer, and specialty pharmacy workflow design.

  • 01Interchangeability is becoming the default ask, not an afterthought: Springer found 17 of 26 approvals pursued interchangeability concurrently, which changes how buyers should time contracting and conversions.
  • 02Springer reported average approval timelines decreased from 798 days for applications dated in 2020 to 364 days for applications dated in 2024, which can compress planning windows for monitoring and implementation.
  • 03A new interchangeable ustekinumab option means the hard work is no longer clinical, it is operational: NDC mapping, EMR preference lists, substitution rules by state, and patient communications decide whether savings show up.

Sep 8, 2026

AAO-HNSF hearing loss guideline moves audiograms and amplification into primary care

AAO-HNSF’s new age-related hearing loss guideline calls for screening adults starting at age 50 and escalating to otoscopy, audiogram, and appropriately fit amplification. It shifts hearing loss from “patient complaint” to a routine primary-care workflow. The pressure shows up in audiology capacity, referral design, and documentation standards.

  • 01Screening at age 50 becomes a repeatable workflow, so capacity planning shifts from episodic ENT referrals to steady primary-care volume, especially where annual wellness visits are a dominant access point.
  • 02The guideline’s escalation sequence, screen, otoscopy, audiogram, amplification, then cochlear implant candidacy evaluation, creates a measurable funnel that health systems can instrument in the EHR and manage like any other pathway.
  • 03Asymmetric loss remains a separate trigger for MRI in many settings, and 2026 pre-proof work using NHANES and SEER highlights why imaging criteria choices can swing scan volume, a budgeting and radiology access issue, not a clinical footnote.

Sep 7, 2026

ADHA shifts My Health Record to multi-supplier ops as Accenture signs new 3-year contract

ADHA shifts My Health Record to multi-supplier ops as Accenture signs new 3-year contract

Accenture will keep supporting Australia’s My Health Record under a new three-year contract. ADHA is moving the platform to a multi-supplier operating model. The shift raises questions about shared integration discipline, tooling, and accountability when changes hit production.

  • 01Multi-supplier delivery is spreading across national-scale health platforms, as ADHA's My Health Record shift shows, moving risk from vendor selection to integration, runbooks, and accountability.
  • 02GenAI model upgrades are arriving with healthcare-specific claims, but the procurement work moves to evidence, safety controls, and monitoring once models sit inside clinical workflows.
  • 03Embedded AI expands the cyber asset inventory problem: if teams cannot discover the AI components across endpoints and devices, they cannot reliably secure or audit them.

Sep 7, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512