Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

How Life Science Manufacturing Facilities Can Successfully Adapt To Change

In this podcast episode of “Exceeding Your Benchmark,” host Gabrielle is joined by Ashley Harp, Lead Process Engineer at CRB. They discuss the challenges manufacturing facilities like Life Science Companies are facing as they adapt to new technologies and advancements in manufacturing, specifically in the area of combining highly potent active pharmaceutical ingredients (HPAPIs) and…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Promoted content from Benchmark Products on MarketScale.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

In this podcast episode of “Exceeding Your Benchmark,” host Gabrielle is joined by Ashley Harp, Lead Process Engineer at CRB. They discuss the challenges manufacturing facilities like Life Science Companies are facing as they adapt to new technologies and advancements in manufacturing, specifically in the area of combining highly potent active pharmaceutical ingredients (HPAPIs) and monoclonal antibodies into antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).

Ashley explains that these changes in drug delivery allow for targeted therapies and that ADCs are a combination of HPAPIs and monoclonal antibodies, chemically bound together via a linker. The goal of ADCs is to increase the therapeutic window by delivering a drug directly to a target cell and minimizing off-target effects and systemic responses. Ashley notes that even though these therapies have been around for a long time, recent improvements in synthesis, linker technologies, and regulatory approvals are driving rapid growth and change in the industry.

One of the main challenges Ashley highlights is the need for a balance between containment and cleaning, and aseptic facility design in ADC manufacturing. In the past, equipment and facilities were designed for either aseptic manufacturing or for product and personal protection, but now the standard and expectations are for both.

“We’ve completed risk assessments, changed design of equipment, improved facility design all to allow for high standards for both personal protection as well as product protection.”

Advances in cleaning practices and materials have also led to new test methods to check for the presence or absence of contaminants in new products.

Another challenge is a lack of adequate manufacturing capacity, especially due to the focus on COVID-related products. Ashley emphasizes the need for facilities to be designed for the right products and “not just high-speed, high-throughput production”.

Gabrielle and Ashley continue to discuss the challenges companies face in transitioning from clinical to commercial life science manufacturing. Ashley highlights the need for expertise in small-scale production, safety, and efficient scaling as clinical trials progress. They also discuss the importance of rapid changeover between different drug products in clinical facilities and the need for improved delivery systems as they move into late-phase clinical and commercial manufacturing.

As companies move to larger scales, the processes need to be more efficient, with methods for personnel and material movement, ensuring that the space remains clean, and understanding the increased use of cleaning materials and sanitizing agents. The focus on contamination control strategies is also emphasized, with an increased expectation that manufacturers prove that they have strategies for microbial and cross-contamination.

The host and Ashley also discuss the importance of sustainability and waste handling as companies move into commercial manufacturing and the need for companies to decide whether to build or adapt their own in-house manufacturing facilities or partner with a contract manufacturing organization (CMO). Ashley advises that companies should consider experience and scheduling, along with the robustness of their internal quality systems, when making this decision.

Overall, the podcast highlights the ongoing challenges in the industry as companies adapt to new technologies and advancements in manufacturing, specifically in the area of ADCs.

Benchmark Products

Part of this channel

Benchmark Products

ISO-certified cleanroom supplies for life science manufacturers.

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

U.S. health plan administrative costs rose 2.7% to about $69.2 billion in the first half of 2026, even as margins improved to 4.1%. Black Book Research's 2027 outlook says AI is starting to move payer sourcing in both directions. Demand for specialist vendors stays strong in some functions, while automation could make in-house or hybrid models viable in others. The report recommends comparing each major outsourced service with rival vendors and the best internal or hybrid option, and checking whether projected savings become actual cash.

  • 01Every major outsourced payer service should be benchmarked against a rival vendor and against the plan's best feasible internal or hybrid model, a three-way contest at each renewal.
  • 02Avoided vacancies, projected productivity gains and payment recoveries are not recurring cash, so outsourcing savings should not be assumed to fund AI until the service, AI and funding cases each stand on their own.
  • 03Provider data sits on both sides of the sourcing question: it is a top pain point and a specialist-demand area, yet also one of the functions where automation could make hybrid or in-house models viable.

Nov 11, 2026

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham Health and Alleghany Health marked one year with Advocate Health as a surgical technology program drew 65 applicants for 12 seats. An anniversary release lists $11.3 million in pay and rewards and a $19.3 million capital figure, and says nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services through Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist. Local training seats look like the next limit in Elkin.

  • 01In rural North Carolina, a new surgical technology program drew more than five applicants per seat, which points to training capacity, not interest, as the thing to expand.
  • 02Pay and rewards totaled $11.3 million in year one, versus a $19.3 million capital figure—about 58% as large, by MarketScale’s arithmetic.
  • 03Nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services versus just over 70 virtual consultations and encounters (about 14:1 by MarketScale’s arithmetic), with expanded virtual care planned for year two.

Nov 10, 2026

Study: AI draft echo reports cut cardiologist time 46%

Study: AI draft echo reports cut cardiologist time 46%

Late-breaking research presented November 9 at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2026 reported that AI-drafted preliminary echocardiogram reports were comparable to human drafts. Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes finalizing AI drafts versus 8.5 minutes without AI. The findings are a non-peer-reviewed abstract.

  • 01Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes finalizing AI-drafted echo reports versus 8.5 minutes without AI, about 46% less time.
  • 02Cardiologists made substantial changes to 50.6% of AI drafts and 49.7% of human drafts.
  • 03The research used 1,200 echocardiograms from 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California medical centers.

Nov 9, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512