Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

NAVIGATING THE AGILE APPROACH TO MEDICAL PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

Engineers love to build things! Sunrise is working to keep it that way. Traditionally, development of medical products was done using a “waterfall” development process where each phase of a project builds on the previous phase to deliver exactly what was defined in requirements up front. Agile offers a more flexible approach that maintains the…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Engineers love to build things! Sunrise is working to keep it that way.

Traditionally, development of medical products was done using a “waterfall” development process where each phase of a project builds on the previous phase to deliver exactly what was defined in requirements up front. Agile offers a more flexible approach that maintains the needed medical rigor, maximizes learning, and allows requirements to evolve to a more optimum solution.

As identified in AAMI TIR45:2012, the Agile approach to Medical Product development is intended to improve development in 5 basic areas:

  • Quality
  • Productivity
  • Predictability
  • Product effectiveness
  • Safety

Quality is measured during development rather than waiting until the project is complete. The Agile methodology builds the concept of “done” into the process by requiring testing as you go. This in turn, improves on productivity as the engineers who work on the project understand before approaching a task what it means to be “done.” The engineers, on a regular basis, and regardless of the stage of development, demonstrate an operational product to the “owner”.

These frequent demonstrations improve product effectiveness as the “owner” is able to see, touch, and feel the product during the entire process. This also helps to predict when and where the project is with relation to schedule and cost.

Questions concerning product safety, clinician-backed confidence, and consumer opinion are a few of many inquiries that can direct the course of a medical product’s development. Setting strict feature sets without the ability to adjust; strict schedules without the ability to adjust; and rigid budgets without the ability to adjust can be detrimental to the end goal. As a result, Agile product development has become an increasingly popular approach to developing medical products.

The Agile methodology enhances an engineer’s fundamental thought process by:

  • Decomposing large problems into manageable tasks called stories
  • Defining “Done” for each story
  • Providing better visibility for team members, management, and the client about the progress of projects
  • Consistently building products using the same process throughout the company and with all disciplines

Agile product development is customer focused. The process encourages stakeholder and developer collaboration, and bases success on the safety and efficacy efficiency of the final product. A few ways to approach this type of project management style in the development of medical devices are:

Safety and Risk

With the needs of the end user clearly identified, the solution must be designed to solve the problem at hand without undue risk and safety exposure. Risk management activities are part of the development process, and integrating risk management into product development is critical to ensure safety and efficacy. Risk mitigations are converted into requirements, and ultimately into Agile stories and managed like any other feature. These safety requirements are decomposed into manageable tasks and put into stories.

System and Software Architecture 

System and Software development is highly iterative by nature, more so when using the agile development process. Developing robust system and software architectures during the planning phases provides a proper foundation for the subsequent design phases.

Team Synergy

Collaboration among team members is essential to ensuring that product development stays on track. Knowledge barriers can be avoided when team members are aware of the bigger picture and understand where the project is and where the project is going. Agile development encourages collaboration to break down roadblocks and spur productivity. Using Agile development across the organization helps engineers and managers to coordinate activities across disciplines including electrical and mechanical engineering.

Feedback Loop

As mentioned above, demonstrations of prototypes to stakeholders in the early phases can yield valuable feedback to improve and refine the final product before costly V&V activities commence. Required usability studies for medical products by the FDA and ISO are other more formal opportunities to gather feedback. The Agile process requires the product is operational after each step in the process, ensuring working prototypes for testing.

Sunrise Solution

Developing medical products is fun. Our goal at Sunrise is to keep it that way and make it more a more predictable process that meets the customer’s needs. The Agile methodology is a powerful tool that can be utilized in the medical product development process to allow flexibility and aid in creating improved products.

Sunrise Labs has the expertise to take innovative ideas from concept to reality. The commercial medical device industry is complex and in constant flux, therefore clients leverage our expertise to overcome design challenges while satisfying regulatory requirements. At Sunrise, our passion is improving patient outcomes by helping our clients succeed in the development of beneficial medical devices.

Learn more about Sunrise Labs, our team, services, and values today.

Read more at sunriselabs.com

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

More nurses did not lift safety culture scores in a 205-hospital analysis

More nurses did not lift safety culture scores in a 205-hospital analysis

A 2026 analysis in the Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy combined 2021–2022 HSOPC results with AHA, HCRIS, and AHRF data across 205 hospitals and reported that small increases in nurse and physician staffing lined up with slightly lower “percent positive” patient safety culture scores in several dimensions. According to the Journal of Healthcare Management abstract hosted on Ovid, the study described a 2% decrease in positive staffing perceptions with β=−0.02 per additional nurse FTE and a −0.01 change in perceived reporting of patient safety events per additional nurse, while additional physician staffing was associated with −0.01 changes in perceptions of communication openness and organizational learning, and joint ventures were associated with a −0.03 change in perceptions of management support for safety (all p<0.05). The operational read is that adding headcount by itself does not ensure stronger safety-culture signals; hospitals also need the workflows that turn observations into closed-loop fixes, from “just culture” reporting expectations to facilities work-order follow-through, as described by Sentara Health leaders in Chief Healthcare Executive and by Health Facilities Management’s environment-of-care guidance. For health system operators, the near-term consequence shows up in how HSOPC survey targets connect to leader scorecards, rounding programs, digital reporting tools, and joint-venture governance, especially where staffing growth is driven by complexity and handoffs.

  • 01If HSOPC “percent positive” scores are a board KPI, staffing increases can move in the opposite direction unless reporting and learning loops scale too. The study’s negative coefficients are small, but they signal a measurement risk during growth.
  • 02Facilities and clinical safety cultures converge in the same pipeline: observation, reporting, triage, work order, verification. HFM Magazine’s door-lock example is the same system problem as event reporting, it is throughput and closure, not awareness.
  • 03Joint ventures can add operational complexity that dilutes perceived management support for safety. That belongs in JV governance charters and integration playbooks, not only in finance models.

Sep 1, 2026

Smart ICU and ambient AI cut errors when they feed data and notes into the EMR

Smart ICU and ambient AI cut errors when they feed data and notes into the EMR

Two HIMSS26 APAC case studies point to the same operational lesson: hospitals are getting measurable gains from “smart ICU” device integration and ambient AI documentation only when those tools are tightly integrated into core clinical workflows. Pondok Indah Hospital Group in Indonesia reported reductions of up to 70% in ICU administrative errors and 40% in adverse drug reactions after integrating smart devices, according to Healthcare IT News. Sir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital in India reported ambient AI is now used for nearly 90% of progress notes and shift handovers across five live use cases on a single EMR-integrated platform, also reported by Healthcare IT News. New JAMA Network cardiovascular research adds a parallel signal on the clinical side, with AI-enabled acquisition and interpretation approaches moving into screening and triage workflows, which raises procurement questions about validation, interoperability, and change management at the bedside.

  • 01A useful benchmark is emerging for documentation automation: “nearly 90% of progress notes and shift handovers” on ambient AI when it is deployed as one EMR-integrated platform, not a set of point tools (Healthcare IT News).
  • 02The measurable ROI in ‘smart ICU’ programs shows up where operators feel pain: fewer administrative errors and medication-related events, not in abstract “digitization” metrics (Healthcare IT News reported up to 70% and 40% reductions, respectively).
  • 03For hospitals with multiple device vendors and fragmented documentation workflows, integration work, interfaces, identity, order context, and governance, is likely to consume more effort than model selection, so contracts and implementation plans should price integration explicitly.

Sep 1, 2026

Gartner says AI budgets are growing faster than the rules to control them

Gartner says AI budgets are growing faster than the rules to control them

Gartner’s late-August 2026 research points to a familiar operational pattern in enterprise AI: budgets are rising faster than the controls meant to keep costs and risk predictable. In a Aug. 26 press release, Gartner said AI spending by customer service leaders surged 38% even as overall service and support budgets rose 2%. Earlier, at Gartner’s March 2026 Data & Analytics Summit, Gartner analysts said only 44% of organizations had adopted financial guardrails or AI FinOps practices, a gap that becomes more painful as AI workloads scale. The practical takeaway for CIOs, customer service operations leaders, and data and analytics teams is to treat AI governance, cost attribution, and human escalation paths as procurement requirements, not after-the-fact fixes.

  • 01A useful benchmark for planning: Gartner pegs AI spend growth in customer service at 38% versus 2% budget growth overall, a mismatch that forces reallocation and harder ROI proof.
  • 02Only 44% of organizations have adopted AI FinOps-style guardrails, according to Gartner. If AI is moving into production, chargeback and consumption limits need to be designed into the rollout.
  • 03Gartner also forecasts spending on securing AI will hit $4.8 billion in 2027, signaling that AI security is becoming a standalone budget line rather than a feature bundled into existing platforms.

Sep 1, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512