Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Network Segmentation: The First Line of Defense in Healthcare’s Cybersecurity Battle

Healthcare systems are adopting network segmentation to isolate critical infrastructure from vulnerable entry points, significantly reducing the impact of breaches and enhancing patient safety. Recent cyberattacks have underscored vulnerabilities in healthcare, making a robust cybersecurity strategy crucial. Without network segmentation, healthcare infrastructure is at increased risk, affecting essential services.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Robin Berthier, Ph.D. · · Dr. Robin BerthierExperts TalkImprovingNetwork Perception
Share

Key takeaways

01

Network segmentation reduces breach impact.

02

Healthcare cybersecurity is a critical concern due to recent attacks.

03

Lack of network segmentation exposes healthcare infrastructure to risks.

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Recent cyberattacks, including a major incident at Change Healthcare, have highlighted severe vulnerabilities in healthcare systems, propelling cybersecurity to a critical concern across the industry. In particular, the lack of network segmentation has exposed healthcare infrastructure to increased risk, affecting essential services and compromising patient care. As healthcare institutions continue to integrate more digital technologies, the complexity and scope of their network environments grow, raising the stakes for security measures.

How can healthcare institutions improve network segmentation and reduce cyber risk? How critical is network architecture in safeguarding patient data and healthcare operations?

In the latest episode of MarketScale's premier roundtable show Experts Talk, Dr. Robin Berthier offers a detailed analysis of the current shortcomings in healthcare network security. Drawing on his experience as the CEO and Co-Founder of Network Perception, Dr. Berthier also details strategic steps to enhance protection.

Key takeaways from Dr. Berthier's discussion include:

– The critical need for enhanced network segmentation within healthcare IT environments.

– The role of third-party connections in increasing cybersecurity risks.

– Common vulnerabilities seen in the postmortem analyses of recent healthcare cyberattacks.

– Strategies for healthcare institutions to isolate critical systems from general IT networks.

– The importance of continuous security monitoring and updating to adapt to new threats.

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

The attack surface that we have to protect just expanded in the last five to ten years. Right? That we you know, you you're right. With those VPNs, we're just no longer having to protect our own network. We also have to protect I mean, we also have to consider the the risk that the third parties, the solution providers are bringing to our network through their connectivity. And and for me, what's very surprising whenever I see those, the postmortem on those attacks is just a lack of segmentation between the critical systems and the the general IT admin or email system. And and when a large organization is shutting down those operations, that means a lack of confidence in the way they can segment and and cut off those critical systems from the rest. So so we have a lot to You're hitting you're hitting it. Yeah. Absolutely. There is no segmentation when it comes in IT. In In in in hospitals, it's all in the same data center. They're all in the same VLANs often. There there's really no segmentation. This is our email and and our active directory, and this is our pure medical IT focus driven. I don't that that is not a common thing to do. I've seen it here and there. Folks who take security really serious, and they do patch Tuesday and all that fun stuff. But the segmentation is is is definitely lacking in in a lot of hospitals.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

RB
Robin Berthier, Ph.D.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Healthcare AI should give doctors attention back, not shorter visits

Healthcare AI should give doctors attention back, not shorter visits

Healthcare organizations should deploy AI to give clinicians back attention and capacity for better decisions, not simply shorten visits. Landry argues AI should fit into existing workflows with insights appearing at the right time, and that organizations should set clear governance and automation boundaries before deployment and measure what changes for patients, clinicians and the organization.

  • 01AI success in healthcare should expand clinician capacity for thoughtful care, not optimize for visit speed; a three-minute appointment is not patient-centered innovation.
  • 02Design AI into workflows clinicians already use with insights appearing at the right moment, making adoption a workflow problem rather than a training problem.
  • 03Set automation boundaries before deploying AI, specifying what it may do alone, what it recommends for clinician decision-making, and what requires explicit human control and accountability.

Nov 11, 2026

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

U.S. health plan administrative costs rose 2.7% to about $69.2 billion in the first half of 2026, even as margins improved to 4.1%. Black Book Research's 2027 outlook says AI is starting to move payer sourcing in both directions. Demand for specialist vendors stays strong in some functions, while automation could make in-house or hybrid models viable in others. The report recommends comparing each major outsourced service with rival vendors and the best internal or hybrid option, and checking whether projected savings become actual cash.

  • 01Every major outsourced payer service should be benchmarked against a rival vendor and against the plan's best feasible internal or hybrid model, a three-way contest at each renewal.
  • 02Avoided vacancies, projected productivity gains and payment recoveries are not recurring cash, so outsourcing savings should not be assumed to fund AI until the service, AI and funding cases each stand on their own.
  • 03Provider data sits on both sides of the sourcing question: it is a top pain point and a specialist-demand area, yet also one of the functions where automation could make hybrid or in-house models viable.

Nov 11, 2026

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham Health and Alleghany Health marked one year with Advocate Health as a surgical technology program drew 65 applicants for 12 seats. An anniversary release lists $11.3 million in pay and rewards and a $19.3 million capital figure, and says nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services through Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist. Local training seats look like the next limit in Elkin.

  • 01In rural North Carolina, a new surgical technology program drew more than five applicants per seat, which points to training capacity, not interest, as the thing to expand.
  • 02Pay and rewards totaled $11.3 million in year one, versus a $19.3 million capital figure—about 58% as large, by MarketScale’s arithmetic.
  • 03Nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services versus just over 70 virtual consultations and encounters (about 14:1 by MarketScale’s arithmetic), with expanded virtual care planned for year two.

Nov 10, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

About the Expert

RB
Robin Berthier, Ph.D.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512