Few Physicians Favor Payment Plan Changes

Value Based Payment (VBP), where health care purchasers and payers pay based upon the quality and outcomes of care, is a relatively new way to pay for healthcare that faces considerable opposition from physicians, who think it won’t have any effect on care or controlling costs. In fact, according to FHMA, in a Leavitt Partners survey of 621 physicians, “Only one-fifth of physicians thought either bundled payments or hospital-led accountable care organizations (ACOs) would contain healthcare costs,” and “Similarly, few thought patient health improvements likely would result from bundled payments (19 percent), ACOs (29 percent), or episode-based payments (29 percent).”
In fact, many physicians are unaware that of the kinds of payments their hospitals handle, including ACOs and bundled payments. “Pluralities of physicians were uncertain about the patient health benefits of ACOs (46 percent), bundled payments (48 percent), capitated payments (45 percent), and patient-centered medical homes (46 percent). And majorities were uncertain about the health benefits of integrated delivery networks (56 percent), episode-based payments (55 percent), and global payments (58 percent).” Among those who were aware of the kinds of payments their hospitals accepted, most were still opposed—primarily because the payment plans were new and they didn’t like how their payments were affected.
This doesn’t mean physicians don’t have their own ideas about what would make for better payment plans. These same physicians preferred payment plans with “physician pay for performance (40 percent) and patient-centered medical homes (40 percent).” They also thought that “an increased focus on wellness and prevention (60 percent), improved management of mental health (56 percent), and better management of heavy utilizers of care (52 percent)” were more likely to contain costs.
Overall, doctor opposition to these new payment plans seem to stem primarily from uncertainty—uncertainty of how they would work, uncertainty in the middle of massive and ongoing changes in health care payment plans from both the government and private sector, and uncertainty of how and how much they would get paid for services. All of this uncertainty drives much of the doctor opposition to the changes taking place. Some simply don’t have the time to learn about all the intricacies around payment plans.
For many of these payment plans to succeed, physician buy-in—even grudging buy-in—is absolutely necessary. For third party payers to get physicians onboard, there needs to be more outreach to physicians to educate them about what these payment changes mean for both patient care and doctor remuneration. For doctors who have been working in the old system for decades, it will likely take longer to persuade them these plans are to everyone’ benefit—if they are ever persuaded.
Most people don’t like change, nor to have their expectations altered, and doctors are certainly no different in this matter. Perhaps less so, given the fact they would much prefer to simply see patients and not have to be bothered by payment plans. But so long as changes are occurring which affect what they can do and how much they are paid, they are going to be bothered by these ongoing changes.

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Image

Latest

the career game loop
Unity’s Jessica Lindl on Playing the Career Game Loop: Learning to Earn in the New Economy (Episode 2)
June 16, 2025

Today’s workforce is facing profound disruption, driven by automation, AI, and shrinking entry-level job opportunities. According to SignalFire’s 2025 State of Talent report, entry-level hiring in tech has dropped by 50% from pre-pandemic levels. In this shifting landscape, younger workers aren’t just seeking jobs—they’re demanding agency, feedback, and purpose. Game-based learning models like the…

Read More
career game loop
Unity’s Jessica Lindl on Playing the Career Game Loop: Learning to Earn in the New Economy (Episode 1)
June 16, 2025

As traditional career paths break down, economic mobility is being redefined by adaptability, not academic credentials. Today, 52% of college graduates are underemployed a year after graduation, working in roles that don’t require a four-year degree. Meanwhile, networking strategies like informational interviews yield one job offer per 12 conversations—far more effective than the one-in-200…

Read More
Equipping FENs in the UK with Tools to Thrive | Annesha Archyangelio | EP#4 - Live from ICN
Equipping FENs in the UK with Tools to Thrive – Live from ICN
June 13, 2025

In this final ICN 2025 episode recorded on the floor of the International Council of Nurses Congress in Helsinki, host Lea Sims welcomes Annesha Archyangelio, Regional Director of Nursing for NHS England. A Jamaican-born, UK-based nursing leader, Annesha shares her powerful personal migration story and how it inspired her to create tools and guidance…

Read More
Advancing Global Competency Frameworks for the Nursing Profession - Live from ICN
Advancing Global Competency Frameworks for the Nursing Profession – Live from ICN
June 13, 2025

In this special episode recorded at the 2025 International Council of Nurses Congress in Helsinki, host Lea Sims sits down with Professor Sylvia Fung, President of the Hong Kong Academy of Nursing & Midwifery, and Professor Ying Zhou of Guangzhou Huashang College. Together, they discuss how the nursing profession is evolving in Asia and the…

Read More