Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Proven Techniques for Reining In Supply Chain Costs

Proven Techniques for Reining In Supply Chain Costs Healthcare delivery in the United States is experiencing a period of extreme flux and uncertainty that is combining to escalate costs. It is compounded by a healthcare supply chain which is vast, complex and plagued with inefficiencies. Supply costs can account for 25-30% of a hospital’s operating…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Proven Techniques for Reining In Supply Chain Costs

Healthcare delivery in the United States is experiencing a period of extreme flux and uncertainty that is combining to escalate costs. It is compounded by a healthcare supply chain which is vast, complex and plagued with inefficiencies. Supply costs can account for 25-30% of a hospital’s operating budget. Supplies relate directly to the patient experience, making it difficult to always settle for the least expensive option. Consequently, hospitals are continually faced with the challenge of decreasing supply chain costs without compromising patient care.

Supply Chain and Physician Preference Items

The balance of cost and function may be most true with Physician Preference Items (PPI) that can account for up to 60% of supply spend. As individual physicians typically select those specific tools with which they are most comfortable, PPI products can be extremely varied across the hospital. This variance, coupled with the high cost of PPI products, makes it difficult for hospital administrators to reduce spend across their organization. In order to keep supply spend in check, healthcare administrators must work collaboratively with physicians and their established preferences to address the financial bottom line and efforts to reduce costs while also improving efficiencies. It’s a collective approach among all stakeholders to balance cost, quality and outcomes.

One opportunity to significantly reduce supply chain inefficiencies and costs is through product standardization. By eliminating the number of similar products, hospitals are able to negotiate more aggressively with vendors to achieve higher value. When it comes to PPI, consideration should be made to determine which items are “preference” driven versus clinically necessary.

Standardizing physician preference items requires involving physicians in the process and educating them with clinical and financial data of clinical utilization patterns, patient outcomes, and product costs and value. While a complex and involved process, the savings extracted from a strategic focus on PPI is well worth the time and investment. TPC is a proven leader in assessing PPI opportunities, collaborating with physicians, and developing successful PPI programs that reduce supply spend without compromising clinical quality or patient care.

TPC Focus on Supply Chain and Physician Preference Items

The TPC model enables hospitals to aggregate their volume to wield increased purchasing power. By drawing upon the combined expertise of Members, TPC gives physicians, nurses, pharmacists and other clinical specialists a method to evaluate products and assess their financial value, as well as their impact on the quality of care. We have found a niche in custom contracting for high-value, complex PPI categories, such as spine and cardiology. By initiating conversations with physicians early in the process we can more effectively evaluate and analyze differences across products and vendors.

TPC collaborates with Members to create a better understanding of the market landscape and drive better decision making. Together, we level-set technology across multiple manufacturers in complex categories and drive standardization in pricing. TPC works with Clinical Value Analysis Teams (CVATs) and Physician Sub-Committees (PSCs) comprised of clinical leaders from each Member facility. These groups offer functionally equivalent, cost-effective solutions to promote a culture of clinical excellence and financial stewardship for all TPC Members. Functional equivalence is determined by objective review of the product using specific, predetermined criteria, and not based on clinical or operational preference. The members of CVATs and PSCs are of vital importance as they serve as clinical advisors, initiative champions and provide clinical input into product decisions.

Through TPC’s custom contracts, Members have achieved significant savings in multiple product categories including, $3.45 million in Cardiac Rhythm Management, $3.5 million in Spinal Implants, and $1.6 million in Interventional Cardiology. As healthcare systems across the country are seeking ways to generate cost savings in the complex category of supply chain, the TPC collaborative model has proven results in reducing supply chain expenses, especially in the challenging area of PPI.

Stronger Together. Superior Results. To learn more about TPC services for supply chain savings, visit http://www.tpc1.com/supply-chain/ today!

Read more at tpc1.com

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Underpayments in healthcare revenue cycle operations lack the visibility of denied claims because they don't trigger alerts or queue workflows. Without dedicated ownership and line-level verification against contract terms, paid claims that fall short of their contractual amount pass through undetected.

  • 01Denial workflows activate on rejection events, but underpayments produce no event, leaving paid claims unverified by default.
  • 02The speaker says many provider groups lack line-level contract intelligence to check each paid line against the applicable terms.
  • 03Payment received and payment checked are separate tasks: one verifies acceptance, the other verifies correctness—and the second often has no assigned owner.

Nov 6, 2026

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero payment on a claim line isn't automatically an underpayment; contract terms, particularly packaging rules, determine whether zero is correct. Chasing unsupported findings damages credibility with payers and weakens the position of legitimate disputes, so revenue cycle teams must verify the full contract terms and effective dates before treating any payment difference as a finding.

  • 01When a contract packages add-ons into the primary procedure, the add-on line may legitimately show zero payment because it is folded into the primary procedure reimbursement.
  • 02Pursuing payment differences that lack contract support burns credibility with payers and can weaken the team’s position on later disputes, including valid ones.
  • 03Always verify the complete contract terms, fee schedules, carve-outs, amendments, and the specific version in effect on the date of service before treating a payment variance as a recoverable underpayment.

Nov 6, 2026

A clean, paid, closed claim can still be short of the contract

A clean, paid, closed claim can still be short of the contract

Practices can receive payment on closed, clean claims that still fall short of negotiated contract amounts because billing ends at coding, submission and posting, while no role owns checking whether payer payments match fee schedules. The speaker argues that contract-level payment review is a separate, complementary function that compares closed claims to contract terms and, run continuously, helps surface shortfalls in time to act within timely filing windows.

  • 01Correctly coded and billed healthcare claims can still result in underpayment.
  • 02Practices should review closed-claim payments against contract terms to spot underpayments.
  • 03Discrepancies in claim payments can persist despite adherence to billing protocols.

Nov 6, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512