Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Six Week Radiographic Comparison of HipGrid® Drone™ and PhantomMSK® Hip

OrthoGrid announces a new clinical whitepaper for review. A retrospective evaluation was conducted for a consecutive cohort of patients having undergone unilateral total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach between January 2017 and January 2020. All procedures were performed at a single site, by a single, fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was supplemented…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share
Six Week Radiographic Comparison of HipGrid® Drone™ and PhantomMSK® Hip

OrthoGrid announces a new clinical whitepaper for review.

A retrospective evaluation was conducted for a consecutive cohort of patients having undergone unilateral total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach between January 2017 and January 2020. All procedures were performed at a single site, by a single, fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was supplemented by either the HipGrid®Drone™ (Drone) or PhantomMSK® Hip (Phantom) (OrthoGrid Systems Inc.

, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) to assist in the positioning of total hip arthroplasty components including cementless, short femoral stem and acetabular cup. The pre-defined target leg length discrepancy (LLD) and global hip offset (GHO) was less than 10mm and acetabular cup abduction angle (ABD) target was 45 degrees plus or minus 10 degrees for the Drone and 42 degrees plus or minus 10 degrees for the Phantom. Accuracy of component placement was evaluated on the six-week post-operative, weight bearing radiographs.

Fluoroscopy times were recorded directly from the c-arm imaging device and surgical times were defined as incision to wound closure. Percentages of patients achieving each component placement goal, as well as reaching all three accuracy goals, were also evaluated. Continuous variables were non-parametric, therefore, group differences were determined by the Mann-Whitney U test and categorical data were evaluated with the Fisher Exact test.

Click here to download the whitepaper:

Some of the data in this whitepaper were previously published in the Journal of Arthroplasty (DOI: 10/1016/j.arth.2020.06.053) by senior surgeon Dr. Cass Nakasone of Straub Medical Center, Bone and Joint Center, Honolulu, HI 96813. Click here to view the article on arthroplastyjournal.org.

To request a HipGrid Drone product demo or a PhantomMSK Hip software demo, please click here.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

Healthcare AI governance, data quality, and interoperability top industry agenda in mid-2026

Healthcare AI governance, data quality, and interoperability top industry agenda in mid-2026

The article discusses the challenges faced by healthcare IT leaders in terms of AI governance, data quality, and interoperability by mid-2026. A significant effort is being made to address data readiness challenges and to enhance health data exchange through a $1.3 million federal initiative. These topics are at the forefront of the industry's agenda to improve healthcare infrastructure and outcomes.

  • 01AI governance gaps are challenging healthcare IT leaders.
  • 02Data readiness is a critical concern in healthcare.
  • 03Federal funding is supporting health data exchange initiatives.

Jul 2, 2026

Healthcare Supply Chain Has a Board-Level Governance Problem.

Healthcare Supply Chain Has a Board-Level Governance Problem.

Healthcare providers recognize supply chain as a top financial lever, yet boards review it less than quarterly, creating a structural governance gap. This misalignment is driving 71% of organizations to replace or upgrade major supply chain applications within 24 months, with demand shifting toward integrated platforms that deliver board-level reporting and measurable ROI.

  • 0183% of healthcare supply chain professionals report board-level review occurs less than quarterly despite 90% ranking supply chain as a top-three financial lever
  • 0271% of health systems plan to replace or upgrade major supply chain applications in the next 24 months, driven by fragmented architectures and weak integration rather than platform failure
  • 03Healthcare supply chain management market projected to grow from $3.94 billion in 2026 to $6.52 billion by 2031, driven by modernization replacing legacy systems under margin pressure

Jun 29, 2026

How Do You Work Around Hospital Operations?

How Do You Work Around Hospital Operations?

The article discusses the unique challenges of conducting restoration or renovation work in hospitals without disrupting their essential operations. This requires meticulous planning and execution to ensure that patient care and facility access remain uninterrupted. The primary goal of such projects is to maintain hospital functionality while completing the necessary work.

  • 01Hospitals must maintain operations during renovations.
  • 02Patient care and staff access are top priorities.
  • 03Projects require extensive planning to minimize disruption.

Jun 26, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub