Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to Industries

Healthcare

Six Week Radiographic Comparison of HipGrid® Drone™ and PhantomMSK® Hip

OrthoGrid announces a new clinical whitepaper for review. A retrospective evaluation was conducted for a consecutive cohort of patients having undergone unilateral total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach between January 2017 and January 2020. All procedures were performed at a single site, by a single, fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was supplemented…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share
Six Week Radiographic Comparison of HipGrid® Drone™ and PhantomMSK® Hip

OrthoGrid announces a new clinical whitepaper for review.

A retrospective evaluation was conducted for a consecutive cohort of patients having undergone unilateral total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach between January 2017 and January 2020. All procedures were performed at a single site, by a single, fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon. Intraoperative fluoroscopy was supplemented by either the HipGrid®Drone™ (Drone) or PhantomMSK® Hip (Phantom) (OrthoGrid Systems Inc.

, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) to assist in the positioning of total hip arthroplasty components including cementless, short femoral stem and acetabular cup. The pre-defined target leg length discrepancy (LLD) and global hip offset (GHO) was less than 10mm and acetabular cup abduction angle (ABD) target was 45 degrees plus or minus 10 degrees for the Drone and 42 degrees plus or minus 10 degrees for the Phantom. Accuracy of component placement was evaluated on the six-week post-operative, weight bearing radiographs.

Fluoroscopy times were recorded directly from the c-arm imaging device and surgical times were defined as incision to wound closure. Percentages of patients achieving each component placement goal, as well as reaching all three accuracy goals, were also evaluated. Continuous variables were non-parametric, therefore, group differences were determined by the Mann-Whitney U test and categorical data were evaluated with the Fisher Exact test.

Click here to download the whitepaper:

Some of the data in this whitepaper were previously published in the Journal of Arthroplasty (DOI: 10/1016/j.arth.2020.06.053) by senior surgeon Dr. Cass Nakasone of Straub Medical Center, Bone and Joint Center, Honolulu, HI 96813. Click here to view the article on arthroplastyjournal.org.

To request a HipGrid Drone product demo or a PhantomMSK Hip software demo, please click here.

New to MarketScale?

MarketScale is the platform Healthcare companies use to turn their own experts into content like this. Want the short overview?

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

How Do You Work Around Hospital Operations?

How Do You Work Around Hospital Operations?

The article discusses the unique challenges of conducting restoration or renovation work in hospitals without disrupting their essential operations. This requires meticulous planning and execution to ensure that patient care and facility access remain uninterrupted. The primary goal of such projects is to maintain hospital functionality while completing the necessary work.

  • 01Hospitals must maintain operations during renovations.
  • 02Patient care and staff access are top priorities.
  • 03Projects require extensive planning to minimize disruption.

Jun 26, 2026

Digital healthcare's four pillars: how hardware, software, platforms, and enablers are reshaping medicine

Digital healthcare's four pillars: how hardware, software, platforms, and enablers are reshaping medicine

Digital healthcare is being transformed by four key sectors: hardware, software, platforms, and enablers. These sectors are driving global investment and changing the way care is delivered, from AI diagnostics to electroceuticals. The integration of these technologies is essential for the evolution of modern medicine.

  • 01Digital healthcare is shaped by four core sectors: hardware, software, platforms, and enablers.
  • 02Investment in digital health technologies is increasing globally.
  • 03Technologies like AI diagnostics and electroceuticals are changing care delivery.

Jun 26, 2026

Health tech's next phase: AI partnerships, virtual care wins, and the push for real interoperability

Health tech's next phase: AI partnerships, virtual care wins, and the push for real interoperability

The healthcare technology industry is evolving significantly, characterized by advancements in AI partnerships and virtual care solutions. The sector is also responding to CMS mandates for real interoperability in mid-2026. Execution is the key theme as businesses leverage technology to improve healthcare delivery.

  • 01AI partnerships are transforming healthcare processes.
  • 02Virtual care solutions are showing significant benefits.
  • 03Compliance with CMS interoperability mandates is crucial.

Jun 23, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub