Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Supporting the Safe, Effective and Efficient Use of UV-C Disinfection in Healthcare and Beyond

UV-C light has been part of disinfection processes in healthcare settings for some time. Now, it’s becoming an essential tool in other environments as a safe and fast way to kill pathogens. But using UV-C effectively requires users to know if they’ve delivered a sufficient dose of irradiation to a variety of surfaces – and…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share
Supporting the Safe, Effective and Efficient Use of UV-C Disinfection in Healthcare and Beyond

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

UV-C light has been part of disinfection processes in healthcare settings for some time. Now, it’s becoming an essential tool in other environments as a safe and fast way to kill pathogens. But using UV-C effectively requires users to know if they’ve delivered a sufficient dose of irradiation to a variety of surfaces – and that can be difficult because UV-C is, in practical terms, an invisible tool.

Since the beginning of the pandemic, the world is acutely aware that infection control isn’t just for hospitals. Discussing these new use cases and how UV-C works, host Daniel Litwin spoke with Wendy Brady, Director of Global Marketing for Intellego Technologies.

“Pathogens are everywhere on the surfaces we touch and the air we breathe. UV-C can be an important tool to protect spaces outside of healthcare,” Brady said. But the key to successful UV-C disinfection is ensuring that you’ve delivered the right amount of ultraviolet irradiation to surfaces.

So, how exactly does UV-C light work?

“UV-C is part of the ultraviolet spectrum and it has a powerful germicidal effect on bacteria, viruses and fungi,” Brady explained. “The way it works is by breaking the DNA or RNA bonds in organisms so they can then no longer reproduce. It renders them inactive, but a sufficient amount of energy or irradiation must be delivered to surface in order to achieve a germicidal effect.”

With established and widespread use in hospitals, other industries are now looking to the technology to help combat pathogens and make public areas safer. Brady said that schools, airports, hotels, event venues, commercial office buildings and more are all beginning to employ different types of UV-C systems to provide a higher level of sanitization.

Because UV-C is often used in unoccupied spaces or in closed cabinet systems, it’s challenging for operators to know if their device is truly working and that all target areas have received enough irradiation to achieve sanitization. It’s not something they can see, but dosimeters provide that important piece of visible evidence.

“UVC Dosimeters have a color-changing indicator area that shows the ‘dose’ or how much germicidal irradiation has been delivered. By seeing the dose, measured as 25, 50 or 100 mJ/cm², a person can verify that the device has delivered enough energy needed to kill SARS-CoV-2, MRSA or even C. Difficile,” Brady said.

With a dosimeter, users have accurate, visible confirmation and real-time evidence that a UV-C disinfection device has done its job. With this additional context, disinfecting can become a more efficient process and it builds confidence in the effectiveness of the technology.

“Dosimeters can also save time, as users can see when the disinfection cycle is successful. Operators are finding that some areas can be sanitized more quickly than expected because they can see when they’ve reached a target dose. This means they can use their UV-C equipment in a more efficient manner, sanitizing more areas and creating safer environments,” Brady added.

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @MarketScale

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

U.S. health plan administrative costs rose 2.7% to about $69.2 billion in the first half of 2026, even as margins improved to 4.1%. Black Book Research's 2027 outlook says AI is starting to move payer sourcing in both directions. Demand for specialist vendors stays strong in some functions, while automation could make in-house or hybrid models viable in others. The report recommends comparing each major outsourced service with rival vendors and the best internal or hybrid option, and checking whether projected savings become actual cash.

  • 01Every major outsourced payer service should be benchmarked against a rival vendor and against the plan's best feasible internal or hybrid model, a three-way contest at each renewal.
  • 02Avoided vacancies, projected productivity gains and payment recoveries are not recurring cash, so outsourcing savings should not be assumed to fund AI until the service, AI and funding cases each stand on their own.
  • 03Provider data sits on both sides of the sourcing question: it is a top pain point and a specialist-demand area, yet also one of the functions where automation could make hybrid or in-house models viable.

Nov 11, 2026

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham Health and Alleghany Health marked one year with Advocate Health as a surgical technology program drew 65 applicants for 12 seats. An anniversary release lists $11.3 million in pay and rewards and a $19.3 million capital figure, and says nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services through Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist. Local training seats look like the next limit in Elkin.

  • 01In rural North Carolina, a new surgical technology program drew more than five applicants per seat, which points to training capacity, not interest, as the thing to expand.
  • 02Pay and rewards totaled $11.3 million in year one, versus a $19.3 million capital figure—about 58% as large, by MarketScale’s arithmetic.
  • 03Nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services versus just over 70 virtual consultations and encounters (about 14:1 by MarketScale’s arithmetic), with expanded virtual care planned for year two.

Nov 10, 2026

Study: AI draft echo reports cut cardiologist time 46%

Study: AI draft echo reports cut cardiologist time 46%

Late-breaking research presented November 9 at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2026 reported that AI-drafted preliminary echocardiogram reports were comparable to human drafts. Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes finalizing AI drafts versus 8.5 minutes without AI. The findings are a non-peer-reviewed abstract.

  • 01Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes finalizing AI-drafted echo reports versus 8.5 minutes without AI, about 46% less time.
  • 02Cardiologists made substantial changes to 50.6% of AI drafts and 49.7% of human drafts.
  • 03The research used 1,200 echocardiograms from 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California medical centers.

Nov 9, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512