Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

The Pandemic Accelerated Health Systems’ Adoption of Digital Health Services. They’re Now Maneuvering a “Fragmented” Ecosystem.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption across the healthcare industry, from exacerbating the industry’s labor shortage to a heavier involvement from federal and local governments in funding relief programs and an easing of regulatory red tape. It also led to, by complete necessity, a surge in the adoption of digital technologies and services,…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption across the healthcare industry, from exacerbating the industry’s labor shortage to a heavier involvement from federal and local governments in funding relief programs and an easing of regulatory red tape. It also led to, by complete necessity, a surge in the adoption of digital technologies and services, both to help diagnose COVID-19 itself and to provide better oversight on contact-tracing. With the accelerated convergence of healthcare and digital solutions, patients can now access digital health services from the comfort of their homes, and healthcare providers can access patient data in real-time. Where is this providing opportunities and risks for the healthcare industry?

Research conducted during the height of the pandemic found that the pandemic’s “historical moment” is defining a large-scale adoption of already-existing tools like telemedicine solutions, but also paving the way for new digital health services like AI-based diagnostic algorithms and a better foundation for future emergency response needs. According to a report by Grand View Research, the global digital health market will reach a whopping $809.2 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 18.6% during the forecast period. It is expected that the rising incidence of chronic diseases, rising healthcare costs, and technological advancements will all contribute to this expansion.

Despite the fact that digital health services and their adoption are being viewed, in general, as a positive development for the healthcare industry, there are still risks associated with these solutions and the more specific context of mass adoption during a moment of crisis for the healthcare industry. Data security and privacy concerns, for example, are one of the biggest worries and one of the industry’s many pandemic-induced headaches, as seen in the FTC’s recent crackdown on digital health providers that violate its Health Breach Notification Rule.

How should health systems, physicians, and the existing ecosystem of digital health providers maneuver this new reality for the healthcare industry? Kathleen Aller, global head of healthcare market strategy at data technology solutions company InterSystems, reflects on her extensive experience in health IT management to give her views on the benefits and risks of the newly defined ecosystem of digital health services.

Kathleen’s Thoughts:

“When I think about the ways in which digital health is transforming our healthcare environment, the thing that hits me the most is that it untethered patients from the hospital. We spent decades and decades investing in complex equipment that require close proximity to nurses and doctors and technicians that require care to be delivered in place.

Now we can untether those patients. We can deliver care in their home. We can connect them to specialists remotely. We can give them implantables and monitoring and all kinds of care without being in the hospital.

The risk though, to the hospitals, besides the fact that they have to rethink brick and mortar, is that the trillions of dollars we’ve invested as a nation in unified comprehensive electronic health records are at risk of being fragmented and our view of the patient being equally fragmented as new digital health providers come into the market who may not be part of our normal ecosystem, who may in fact be subject to data requirements for cellphones. And the solutions marketed directly to patients mean the data becomes fragmented and we lose sight of that comprehensive patient view, which is one of the reasons InterSystems spend so much of its time working with digital health providers to connect up their solutions with that larger health record.”

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

AAO-HNSF hearing loss guideline moves audiograms and amplification into primary care

AAO-HNSF’s new age-related hearing loss guideline calls for screening adults starting at age 50 and escalating to otoscopy, audiogram, and appropriately fit amplification. It shifts hearing loss from “patient complaint” to a routine primary-care workflow. The pressure shows up in audiology capacity, referral design, and documentation standards.

  • 01Screening at age 50 becomes a repeatable workflow, so capacity planning shifts from episodic ENT referrals to steady primary-care volume, especially where annual wellness visits are a dominant access point.
  • 02The guideline’s escalation sequence, screen, otoscopy, audiogram, amplification, then cochlear implant candidacy evaluation, creates a measurable funnel that health systems can instrument in the EHR and manage like any other pathway.
  • 03Asymmetric loss remains a separate trigger for MRI in many settings, and 2026 pre-proof work using NHANES and SEER highlights why imaging criteria choices can swing scan volume, a budgeting and radiology access issue, not a clinical footnote.

Sep 7, 2026

ADHA shifts My Health Record to multi-supplier ops as Accenture signs new 3-year contract

ADHA shifts My Health Record to multi-supplier ops as Accenture signs new 3-year contract

Accenture will keep supporting Australia’s My Health Record under a new three-year contract. ADHA is moving the platform to a multi-supplier operating model. The shift raises questions about shared integration discipline, tooling, and accountability when changes hit production.

  • 01Multi-supplier delivery is spreading across national-scale health platforms, as ADHA's My Health Record shift shows, moving risk from vendor selection to integration, runbooks, and accountability.
  • 02GenAI model upgrades are arriving with healthcare-specific claims, but the procurement work moves to evidence, safety controls, and monitoring once models sit inside clinical workflows.
  • 03Embedded AI expands the cyber asset inventory problem: if teams cannot discover the AI components across endpoints and devices, they cannot reliably secure or audit them.

Sep 7, 2026

Hospitals need a shortlist as cardiology AI clearances hit 225

Hospitals need a shortlist as cardiology AI clearances hit 225

Cardiology now has 225 FDA-cleared AI algorithms when imaging is included. That volume is the problem. Health systems now need tighter governance, integration checks, and clinical workflow evidence to decide what ships.

  • 01The useful benchmark for governance committees is scale: FDA-cleared AI totals 1,524 overall, with radiology at 1,163 and cardiology at 225 when CV imaging is included, according to Cardiovascular Business.
  • 02Procurement risk is shifting from “is it cleared?” to “where does it run?” because new clearances span cath lab guidance, echo quantification, remote monitoring, and image assessment tools that touch different systems of record.
  • 03AliveCor shows the long game: Healio reported 510(k) clearance for an ECG AI suite in 2020, and Cardiovascular Business listed a new clearance in 2026, a reminder to vet update cadence and post-clearance support.

Sep 7, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512