Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

The Power of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMP) in an American Health Crisis

A 2010 national youth drug abuse study revealed some disturbing results. In 2009, the drugs of choice for 6 of 10 drug abusers in the 12th grade were prescription pharmaceuticals. Likewise, data from a 2008 SAMSHA report revealed that the previous decade had seen a four-fold increase in the number of those seeking treatment for addiction…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

A 2010 national youth drug abuse study revealed some disturbing results. In 2009, the drugs of choice for 6 of 10 drug abusers in the 12th grade were prescription pharmaceuticals. Likewise, data from a 2008 SAMSHA report revealed that the previous decade had seen a four-fold increase in the number of those seeking treatment for addiction to prescription painkillers. In response to the serious public health problem in this country, efforts are underway to combat this growing threat. One solution is the advent of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMP).

What is a PDMP?

PDMP is a healthcare tool with a variety of applications. The first PDMP appeared in California in 1939, primarily as a benefit for law enforcement tracking illegal drug behaviors. Today’s PDMP has evolved; as an online database of prescribing and dispensing data, PDMP helps identify when a patient obtains multiple prescriptions from different practitioners. Each database is state-run and used to address prescription drug diversion and abuse. PDMPs serve multiple functions. A PDMP is a patient care tool, a drug epidemic early warning system, and a drug diversion and insurance fraud investigation mechanism. The goal of the PDMP is to reduce the impact of prescription drug abuse and diversion.

Areas of Current and Future PDMP Impact

Not all states have PDMP requirements. Those who currently require health care personnel to utilize this system are Arizona, Connecticut, Maine, Minnesota, New York, Virginia, North Carolina, and Rhode Island. These states are seeing drastically reduced incidences of fraudulent patient behavior.

This is especially true in highly populated states such as New York, where improved visibility into prescribing patterns and potential drug-seeking behaviors has been critical to combating the practice of “doctor shopping,” as described above, in which drug addicts and system abusers go from clinic to clinic amassing a pile of prescriptions for the desired controlled substances. Looking toward the future, 12 states have requirements pending, and the hope is that the 29 states plus DC and Guam who currently have no requirement will decide to follow suit soon.

New York’s successful program has expanded to include access to other state databases and information, and this transparency and interoperability might be a prediction of the future of PDMP.

Overall Benefits

Data regarding PDMP use by state clearly shows positive benefits in the states that use these tools. While research into PDMP effectiveness is ongoing, a 2012 study looked at rates of painkiller abuse and misuse in PDMP vs. non-PDMP states from 2003 to 2009 and discovered that in non-PDMP states, rates of abuse and misuse increased more rapidly than in states with such programs.

But PDMPs are not just concerned with legality. Hand-in-hand with reduced fraudulent and abusive behavior is the improvement of identification of and treatment options for those spiraling in the tornado of the addiction epidemic, perhaps the real crowning achievement of these programs. A hallmark of addiction is a lack of self-awareness and honesty regarding one’s own harmful behaviors, and the PDMP becomes a life-saving tool in which doctors and patients can have the transparent conversations needed to kick-start recovery.

DrFirst and ChartLogic

DrFirst has been at the forefront of electronic prescribing of controlled substances (EPCS) since it sent the nation’s first electronic prescription of a controlled substance. In our partnership with DrFirst, ChartLogic is poised to make a huge impact on this current health crisis as part of a joint effort. The marriage of our software with DrFirst’s program makes sense given the proven success of our ambulatory EHR suite that includes Electronic Medical Records, Practice Management, and Billing Services. And we are proud to be part of a solution that is not only changing lives, but also saving them

Read more at chartlogic.com

Sources:

http://www.chartlogic.com/blog/the-power-of-prescription-drug-monitoring-programs/#_ednref1

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ondcp/pdmp.pdf

https://searchandrescueusa.org/monitoryourpatients/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=ppc&utm_campaign=2018_PFDK_Nonbrand_PDMP&utm_term=pdmp

https://healthitanalytics.com/news/ny-expands-prescription-drug-monitoring-program-to-25-states

https://www.drugrehab.org/the-benefits-of-prescription-drug-monitoring-programs-pdmp/

https://www.drfirst.com/resources/e-prescribing-mandate-map/

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Underpayments in healthcare revenue cycle operations lack the visibility of denied claims because they don't trigger alerts or queue workflows. Without dedicated ownership and line-level verification against contract terms, paid claims that fall short of their contractual amount pass through undetected.

  • 01Denial workflows activate on rejection events, but underpayments produce no event, leaving paid claims unverified by default.
  • 02The speaker says many provider groups lack line-level contract intelligence to check each paid line against the applicable terms.
  • 03Payment received and payment checked are separate tasks: one verifies acceptance, the other verifies correctness—and the second often has no assigned owner.

Nov 6, 2026

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero payment on a claim line isn't automatically an underpayment; contract terms, particularly packaging rules, determine whether zero is correct. Chasing unsupported findings damages credibility with payers and weakens the position of legitimate disputes, so revenue cycle teams must verify the full contract terms and effective dates before treating any payment difference as a finding.

  • 01When a contract packages add-ons into the primary procedure, the add-on line may legitimately show zero payment because it is folded into the primary procedure reimbursement.
  • 02Pursuing payment differences that lack contract support burns credibility with payers and can weaken the team’s position on later disputes, including valid ones.
  • 03Always verify the complete contract terms, fee schedules, carve-outs, amendments, and the specific version in effect on the date of service before treating a payment variance as a recoverable underpayment.

Nov 6, 2026

A clean, paid, closed claim can still be short of the contract

A clean, paid, closed claim can still be short of the contract

Practices can receive payment on closed, clean claims that still fall short of negotiated contract amounts because billing ends at coding, submission and posting, while no role owns checking whether payer payments match fee schedules. The speaker argues that contract-level payment review is a separate, complementary function that compares closed claims to contract terms and, run continuously, helps surface shortfalls in time to act within timely filing windows.

  • 01Correctly coded and billed healthcare claims can still result in underpayment.
  • 02Practices should review closed-claim payments against contract terms to spot underpayments.
  • 03Discrepancies in claim payments can persist despite adherence to billing protocols.

Nov 6, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512