Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

What a New Look for HIPAA Means for Physicians

No industry looks the same after more than a quarter century of innovation and breakthroughs. Yet in the medical world, HIPAA, a bill passed by the U.S. Congress in 1996, has remained a key regulatory guideline. With innovations in the healthcare sector occurring at a rapid rate, this bill may finally be getting long overdue…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

No industry looks the same after more than a quarter century of innovation and breakthroughs. Yet in the medical world, HIPAA, a bill passed by the U.S. Congress in 1996, has remained a key regulatory guideline. With innovations in the healthcare sector occurring at a rapid rate, this bill may finally be getting long overdue tweaks.

For the first time since 2013, several proposals have been made to change the legislation for 2019.

Changes to Look For

Physicians need to be aware of these updates and how they will affect their practices. All offices will be required to implement these three small modifications into their HIPAA processes:

  • Patients are now able to request digital medical records through digital formats. The clinic will have 30 days, whether on paper or digitally, to produce the information.
  • Patients who pay for services personally and in full may require that the clinic not share treatment information with the patient’s health plan.
  • Clinics can provide immunization information to schools if they are required by law to have it and if a parent/guardian gives written permission.

Other changes include a rise in the maximum penalty for non-compliance to a $50,000 limit, an increase in restrictions on receiving patient authorization to use personal information on marketing campaigns, the simplification of patient authorization for health data for research, and the elimination of insurance companies’ use of genetic information for coverage and cost determinations.

When to Expect Change to Come

A somewhat laborious process, changes to HIPAA regulations follow a specific path. First, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) seeks feedback on HIPAA regulations to see which areas are problematic or outdated. After careful consideration of the feedback, the HHS submits a notice of proposed rule changes and queries healthcare industry stakeholders for comments on the suggested modifications. Once feedback and comments have been carefully assimilated, a final rule change is established. At that time, a temporary grace period will begin so that practices can prepare for compliance with the new regulations. That said, it is possible that changes made to HIPAA this year will not be implemented until 2020.

What This Means for Physicians

While these new rules have not been formalized as of yet, they will have a noticeable impact on the day-to-day routines of physicians around the country. Most notably, the decreased tolerance of non-compliance from the government will assure that clinics follow procedure. HIPAA has been in place in various forms for 23 years, so clinics should already be comfortable working within the parameters of the bill. Fortunately, the grace period will give practices the necessary time to rework their daily procedures to incorporate imminent regulatory changes and avoid non-compliance.

ChartLogic believes education about the latest industry changes is critical, not only to business success, but to patient-physician relationships. To read more about the impact of new HIPAA rules, click here.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

U.S. health plan administrative costs rose 2.7% to about $69.2 billion in the first half of 2026, even as margins improved to 4.1%. Black Book Research's 2027 outlook says AI is starting to move payer sourcing in both directions. Demand for specialist vendors stays strong in some functions, while automation could make in-house or hybrid models viable in others. The report recommends comparing each major outsourced service with rival vendors and the best internal or hybrid option, and checking whether projected savings become actual cash.

  • 01Every major outsourced payer service should be benchmarked against a rival vendor and against the plan's best feasible internal or hybrid model, a three-way contest at each renewal.
  • 02Avoided vacancies, projected productivity gains and payment recoveries are not recurring cash, so outsourcing savings should not be assumed to fund AI until the service, AI and funding cases each stand on their own.
  • 03Provider data sits on both sides of the sourcing question: it is a top pain point and a specialist-demand area, yet also one of the functions where automation could make hybrid or in-house models viable.

Nov 11, 2026

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham Health and Alleghany Health marked one year with Advocate Health as a surgical technology program drew 65 applicants for 12 seats. An anniversary release lists $11.3 million in pay and rewards and a $19.3 million capital figure, and says nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services through Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist. Local training seats look like the next limit in Elkin.

  • 01In rural North Carolina, a new surgical technology program drew more than five applicants per seat, which points to training capacity, not interest, as the thing to expand.
  • 02Pay and rewards totaled $11.3 million in year one, versus a $19.3 million capital figure—about 58% as large, by MarketScale’s arithmetic.
  • 03Nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services versus just over 70 virtual consultations and encounters (about 14:1 by MarketScale’s arithmetic), with expanded virtual care planned for year two.

Nov 10, 2026

Study: AI draft echo reports cut cardiologist time 46%

Study: AI draft echo reports cut cardiologist time 46%

Late-breaking research presented November 9 at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2026 reported that AI-drafted preliminary echocardiogram reports were comparable to human drafts. Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes finalizing AI drafts versus 8.5 minutes without AI. The findings are a non-peer-reviewed abstract.

  • 01Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes finalizing AI-drafted echo reports versus 8.5 minutes without AI, about 46% less time.
  • 02Cardiologists made substantial changes to 50.6% of AI drafts and 49.7% of human drafts.
  • 03The research used 1,200 echocardiograms from 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California medical centers.

Nov 9, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512