Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Why Are Some Restaurants Resisting Reservation Apps?

While there is little question that technology permeates the ways in which we do business, not everyone is keen to “keep up.” For example, although there are now restaurant apps and online reservation systems, many restaurants still do things the old-fashioned way, taking reservations by phone. With Big Hospitality reporting that “60% of consumers booking…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

While there is little question that technology permeates the ways in which we do business, not everyone is keen to “keep up.” For example, although there are now restaurant apps and online reservation systems, many restaurants still do things the old-fashioned way, taking reservations by phone. With Big Hospitality reporting that “60% of consumers booking a restaurant online do so on a smart phone,” one has to wonder why some restaurants would want to actually avoid such apps.

Some of the benefits of having online booking include the ability to make offers that would attract patrons during slower periods. Reservation apps can allow restaurants to offer off-hours specials to help even out the peaks and valleys. The reservation app ResDiary has a feature called ResDiary Off-Peak that allows restaurants to raise and lower prices throughout the day, based on how busy they are. This is basically responsive supply-and-demand at work.

Yet, as Big Hospitality notes, there is also the problem of no-shows. Because making a reservation is so easy, it’s easy to just flake out on the reservation as well. As a result, the number of reservation no-shows has skyrocketed. Which costs restaurants money.

We reached out to more than a dozen restaurants in the Dallas area to see how they are using this kind of technology, but among the four restaurants to comment—Afrah, Jörg’s Café Vienna, The Dinner Table, and Blue Sushi Sake Grill—not a single one claims to use reservation apps.

In the case of Jörg’s Café Vienna, which is only open for lunch and dinner Wednesday through Saturday, there is no problem with getting people through the door during off-peak hours, since there are no off-peak hours. The Dinner Table similarly is only open during lunch and dinner on weekdays, with longer hours Saturday and only lunch Sunday, so the primary benefit of online apps doesn’t exist for them. The Dinner Table does use GrubHub to have their food delivered, but if you want to make a reservation, you will have to call them.

What they all seem to agree on is that they believe requiring customers to call them to make their reservations makes the experience more personal. While younger people, who are more confident in the technology, don’t think twice about making online reservations, older customers aren’t always so sure their reservation was received. This implies that restaurants may vary in their usage of technology based on their perception of which age demographics they are attracting.

This also implies that as time goes on, even the holdouts will eventually end up using reservation apps. After all, young people don’t stay young forever—but their online habits will remain as they get older.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Healthcare Insights

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are choosing alliances over mergers, per a July McDermott Will & Schulte analysis and four July deals tracked by Becker's Hospital Review. St. Christopher's, Nemours, Jefferson and Temple signed a nonbinding alliance letter; Palomar UC San Diego Health launched July 1. Ownership stays put; governance, purchasing and outpatient investment absorb the change.

  • 01In an alliance, the contract does the integrating that an org chart does in a merger: McDermott Will & Schulte says governance design, exclusivity, antitrust review, community commitments and exit rights all have to be settled before signing.
  • 02Purchasing is now explicitly on the table in at least one no-ownership deal, the St. Peter's Health and Billings Clinic-Logan Health talks in Montana, which means shared supply contracts can arrive without a change of control.

Sep 19, 2026

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

An Ophthalmology Times commentary by T.Y. Alvin Liu, Ferdinand Hui and Phillip Phan sorts eye patients into three telemedicine tiers by clinical need. Patients needing regular OCT scans benefit less unless a home device can send the image. Video tools already sit inside Epic and Cerner; the deciding purchase for retina clinics is the imaging device in the patient's living room.

  • 01The dividing line for eye telemedicine is imaging, not video: patients who need regular OCT scans benefit less from remote visits unless a device at home can send the scan, so a video license alone shifts few of those encounters.
  • 02The provider-side requirement, a HIPAA-compliant secured video platform, was already built into Epic and Cerner by 2020; the patient-side requirements (1.5 MB up and down bandwidth, a quiet private room, comfort with the technology) sit outside the health system's control and are the ones worth screening for at scheduling.
  • 03Self-administered home color fundus photography for tracking non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy was named as the nearer route into retina telemedicine; home OCT for wet AMD is the harder gate and the device to watch.

Sep 19, 2026

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Wolters Kluwer Health argues value-based care software is judged on whether customers hit incentive thresholds and avoid penalties. A Fierce Healthcare-reported survey it cites puts value-based care at a quarter or more of revenue for 30% of organizations. The analysis is a vendor publication that ends by pitching its own UpToDate Connect API.

  • 01The sharper question for any population health or care coordination platform is whether it changes what a clinician does at the moment of decision, or only reports afterward what happened. Wolters Kluwer's reading of the evidence is that many platforms still struggle with the first.
  • 02Vendors selling into value-based contracts now face a build-or-license decision on clinical content, because Wolters Kluwer names current, trusted content, consistent clinician adoption across sites, and a traceable link from guidance to quality metrics as the three hard problems.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512