Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Why Are Some Restaurants Resisting Reservation Apps?

While there is little question that technology permeates the ways in which we do business, not everyone is keen to “keep up.” For example, although there are now restaurant apps and online reservation systems, many restaurants still do things the old-fashioned way, taking reservations by phone. With Big Hospitality reporting that “60% of consumers booking…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

While there is little question that technology permeates the ways in which we do business, not everyone is keen to “keep up.” For example, although there are now restaurant apps and online reservation systems, many restaurants still do things the old-fashioned way, taking reservations by phone. With Big Hospitality reporting that “60% of consumers booking a restaurant online do so on a smart phone,” one has to wonder why some restaurants would want to actually avoid such apps.

Some of the benefits of having online booking include the ability to make offers that would attract patrons during slower periods. Reservation apps can allow restaurants to offer off-hours specials to help even out the peaks and valleys. The reservation app ResDiary has a feature called ResDiary Off-Peak that allows restaurants to raise and lower prices throughout the day, based on how busy they are. This is basically responsive supply-and-demand at work.

Yet, as Big Hospitality notes, there is also the problem of no-shows. Because making a reservation is so easy, it’s easy to just flake out on the reservation as well. As a result, the number of reservation no-shows has skyrocketed. Which costs restaurants money.

We reached out to more than a dozen restaurants in the Dallas area to see how they are using this kind of technology, but among the four restaurants to comment—Afrah, Jörg’s Café Vienna, The Dinner Table, and Blue Sushi Sake Grill—not a single one claims to use reservation apps.

In the case of Jörg’s Café Vienna, which is only open for lunch and dinner Wednesday through Saturday, there is no problem with getting people through the door during off-peak hours, since there are no off-peak hours. The Dinner Table similarly is only open during lunch and dinner on weekdays, with longer hours Saturday and only lunch Sunday, so the primary benefit of online apps doesn’t exist for them. The Dinner Table does use GrubHub to have their food delivered, but if you want to make a reservation, you will have to call them.

What they all seem to agree on is that they believe requiring customers to call them to make their reservations makes the experience more personal. While younger people, who are more confident in the technology, don’t think twice about making online reservations, older customers aren’t always so sure their reservation was received. This implies that restaurants may vary in their usage of technology based on their perception of which age demographics they are attracting.

This also implies that as time goes on, even the holdouts will eventually end up using reservation apps. After all, young people don’t stay young forever—but their online habits will remain as they get older.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Humana's $2.8B BlackRock deal lets it buy back CenterWell clinics starting in 2028

Humana's $2.8B BlackRock deal lets it buy back CenterWell clinics starting in 2028

BlackRock's $2.8 billion buys majority ownership of a joint venture holding about 150 CenterWell clinics, replacing WCAS as Humana's outside investor. CenterWell keeps a minority stake and keeps running the clinics. The terms set a timeline: two years of expected growth spending, an option for Humana to buy clinics back from 2028, and a BlackRock right to start a sale of any clinics still in the venture at the end of 2033, with CenterWell getting the first offer. The deal is expected to close in the fourth quarter, subject to regulatory approvals.

  • 01BlackRock's $2.8 billion buys majority ownership of about 150 CenterWell clinics, while Humana keeps day-to-day management and an option to repurchase clinics starting in 2028.
  • 02The 2028 buyback and 2033 sale terms apply to the roughly 150 clinics in the new joint venture. CenterWell Senior Primary Care runs 250 clinics in total.
  • 03The deal’s lower-cost-of-capital claim will be tested after closing—first by how the venture deploys new capital over the next two years to support clinics, open locations and pursue acquisitions, and then by Humana’s 2028 decision on whether to start buying clinics back.

Nov 12, 2026

Healthcare AI should give doctors attention back, not shorter visits

Healthcare AI should give doctors attention back, not shorter visits

Healthcare organizations should deploy AI to give clinicians back attention and capacity for better decisions, not simply shorten visits. Landry argues AI should fit into existing workflows with insights appearing at the right time, and that organizations should set clear governance and automation boundaries before deployment and measure what changes for patients, clinicians and the organization.

  • 01AI success in healthcare should expand clinician capacity for thoughtful care, not optimize for visit speed; a three-minute appointment is not patient-centered innovation.
  • 02Design AI into workflows clinicians already use with insights appearing at the right moment, making adoption a workflow problem rather than a training problem.
  • 03Set automation boundaries before deploying AI, specifying what it may do alone, what it recommends for clinician decision-making, and what requires explicit human control and accountability.

Nov 11, 2026

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

U.S. health plan administrative costs rose 2.7% to about $69.2 billion in the first half of 2026, even as margins improved to 4.1%. Black Book Research's 2027 outlook says AI is starting to move payer sourcing in both directions. Demand for specialist vendors stays strong in some functions, while automation could make in-house or hybrid models viable in others. The report recommends comparing each major outsourced service with rival vendors and the best internal or hybrid option, and checking whether projected savings become actual cash.

  • 01Every major outsourced payer service should be benchmarked against a rival vendor and against the plan's best feasible internal or hybrid model, a three-way contest at each renewal.
  • 02Staffing reductions, payment recoveries, avoided vacancies and productivity improvements may not translate into recurring cash, so plans shouldn’t assume outsourcing savings can fund AI until the service, AI and funding cases are evaluated separately.
  • 03Provider data sits on both sides of the sourcing question: it is a top pain point and a specialist-demand area, yet also one of the functions where automation could make hybrid or in-house models viable.

Nov 11, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512