Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesIndustrial IoT

Should You Outsource Finishing or Build an In-House System?

If you’re a decision maker working in equipment or parts manufacturing, you’ve probably debated whether it’s better to finish your parts in-house or outsource the work to a custom coater. This decision requires a bit of calculus, taking into consideration the costs, workflow, time and capabilities. Even if you’ve run the math countless times, you…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Industrial IoT teams put it to work with AI Visibility (GEO).

By Industrial Iot · Promoted Content
Share
Should You Outsource Finishing or Build an In-House System?

Key takeaways

01

If you’re a decision maker working in equipment or parts manufacturing, you’ve probably debated whether it’s better to finish your parts in-house or outsource the work to a custom coater.

02

This decision requires a bit of calculus, taking into consideration the costs, workflow, time and capabilities.

03

Even if you’ve run the math countless times, you…

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Industrial IoT?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Industrial IoT coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

If you’re a decision maker working in equipment or parts manufacturing, you’ve probably debated whether it’s better to finish your parts in-house or outsource the work to a custom coater. This decision requires a bit of calculus, taking into consideration the costs, workflow, time and capabilities. Even if you’ve run the math countless times, you still may be unsure whether you’re making the right play. To create more confidence in your decision, here are seven questions you can ask yourself when choosing between outsourcing or insourcing your finishing process.

  • If you’re currently outsourcing, what are your finishing costs? Hiring a custom coater to do the work makes sense if your costs are low, but if you’re spending more than $500,000 a year with custom coaters, maybe it’s time to consider investing in your own system to save money in the long run.
  • How much customization is required for your finishes? If your finishing needs aren’t super complex, consider doing it in-house. However, some finishes require very specific equipment that may be hard to come by, expensive or difficult to replicate easily. In that case, outsourcing the work is a good bet, unless you have no conveniently located providers of those types of finish.
  • Do you find yourself at the mercy of your custom coater’s schedule? Maintaining an efficient operation that stays on schedule is important for a smooth, revenue-generating business. But professional coaters tend to work by batching items based on similar characteristics, especially by color. This makes their operation more efficient and helps you keep your costs lower, but their timetable may not suit yours, causing delays that range from days to weeks. Moving the work in-house can help remedy this problem.
  • Do you crate and ship your items to a coater that they ship back? 
    The crating and shipping process on both ends can not only be time and labor intensive, but it also opens opportunities for damages to your finish coat, requiring rework or a price concession. Plus, damages or defects can tarnish your brand image. These problems are best avoided by establishing an internal finishing process with high quality standards.
  • How much are you spending on shipping costs alone to outsource your finishing?
    Shipping isn’t cheap, and if the costs run your operation more than $50,000 a year on top of your coating costs, again…consider building your own system. This extra savings will help the total ROI, allowing a faster recoup for your investment.
  • How often do you find yourself changing custom coaters?

Maybe you switched because you needed better quality. Maybe you switched again because the finishing and/or shipping costs kept rising and you needed a more budget-friendly price. And then you switched, yet again, because you needed a custom coater that had greater production capabilities, provided better service or offered faster delivery. If you switched coaters multiple times in the past few years and had to absorb costs that come with each change, you may be able to save yourself headaches and cash by bringing the job in-house.

  • Do you wish you had better control over the items you currently outsource for finishing?
    If you do decide to consider insourcing your finishing processes, consider if you need an especially flexible system that can handle a wide variety of parts. Historically, most automated finishing systems have not been very flexible, but new options exist to change that. With an IntelliFinishing System you can make sure work is done to your superior level of satisfaction, and even quickly adjust the process (or recipe) as needed to coat items to the highest quality possible.

IntelliFinishing is a complete finishing systems provider. Our systems use revolutionary modular conveyors and smart control technology that is second to none. Recently, Jorge Martinez, owner of JR Custom Fabrication, decided to switch from outsourcing to in-house finishing. After his first year of using his new IntelliFinishing System, he states,

“Over the last 25 to 30 years we’ve outsourced our powder coating. We were spending upwards of a million dollars a year in outside coatings, and we decided to bring it in-house, not only for more control of quality but also of scheduling. It’s been a wise choice. We were spending over $100,000 on transporting costs alone. That completely goes away. There have been savings in handling and damage as well. Now, as soon as parts come off the finishing line, we inspect them for quality. If there is a problem then we address it immediately. And having control over the whole system is probably the biggest plus.” – Jorge Martinez 

Finishing in-house made sense for JR Custom Fabrication and it could be the smart play for your business as well.

Of course, if you are a custom coater and interested in an automated system, you’ll obtain greater system flexibility and consequently a wider range of coating options with an IntelliFinishing System.

Read more at intellifinishing.com

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Industrial IoT starts with a company putting its controls engineers, plant-floor specialists, and integration partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Plant and controls buyers research deep before contact, and your engineers get to shape that research.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

II
Industrial Iot

Follow Industrial IoT Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Industrial IoT: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Industrial IoT buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Industrial IoT expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your controls engineers, plant-floor specialists, and integration partners into the articles, video, and social content Industrial IoT buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Industrial IoT Insights

Luxonis OAK 4 cameras run up to 52 TOPS of AI on board from $749

Luxonis OAK 4 cameras run up to 52 TOPS of AI on board from $749

Luxonis launched its OAK 4 edge AI cameras and Hub cloud platform in December 2025. Each runs 52 TOPS of inference on a Qualcomm QCS8550 with no host PC, cloud video stream or server, and prices start at $749. That puts vision compute on the camera itself.

  • 01The industrial PC beside the camera becomes optional: OAK 4 runs inference entirely on the device, so a vision cell's bill of materials shifts from camera plus host computer to camera plus a Hub subscription tier, one of which is free.
  • 02The 40X compute improvement Luxonis claims has no stated baseline in any of the coverage, so a buyer comparing OAK 4 against a prior OAK deployment should ask for the previous generation's TOPS figure before using the multiplier.
  • 03Snaps, the Hub feature that collects data at the edge to retrain models against drift, is the mechanism worth testing in a pilot; it is an announced capability, not yet a documented field result in the published reporting.

Sep 17, 2026

IoT sensor market forecast to grow 37.6% a year to $549 billion by 2035

IoT sensor market forecast to grow 37.6% a year to $549 billion by 2035

Global Market Insights projects the IoT sensor market will grow from about $24 billion in 2025 to $549 billion by 2035. That is a 37.6% annual rate, according to Smart Industry's report on the study. The bigger operational implication is data volume, not sensor cost.

  • 01Predictive maintenance is the one use case Global Market Insights ties to measurable outcomes, downtime and asset efficiency, which makes it the sensor line item most likely to survive a capital review.
  • 02GMI's stated base of about $24 billion in 2025 and its 37.6% growth rate give operators a near-term checkpoint to test against real quotes long before the 2035 endpoint.
  • 03Inertial sensors, meaning accelerometers, gyroscopes and magnetometers, are widely used across consumer electronics, industrial systems, automotive platforms, wearables and drones, according to Smart Industry's summary of the GMI report.

Sep 17, 2026

Lockheed Martin and Xaba cite 10x gain in robot drilling accuracy with xCognition

Lockheed Martin and Xaba cite 10x gain in robot drilling accuracy with xCognition

Lockheed Martin and Xaba reported that adding Xaba’s xCognition controller to an industrial robot improved drilling accuracy and consistency by 10x. The claim is tied to a two-phase evaluation that included drilling tests on an aluminum plate with specified positional tolerances. The result points to how robotics augmented with xCognition could take on operations typically kept on more expensive and less flexible CNC machines.

  • 01Lockheed Martin and Xaba reported a 10x accuracy-and-consistency improvement tied to a two-phase test that included drilling on an aluminum plate with specified positional tolerances.
  • 02If the goal is moving selected drilling or light machining off CNC, the first gating item is whether the controller enables path-mode accuracy under tolerance, not whether the robot can detect parts.
  • 03Moruzzi’s observation that most AI research emphasis is still on computer vision is a reminder to separate “perception AI” from “process AI” when writing automation requirements and budgets.

Sep 13, 2026

Explore More Industrial IoT Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Industrial IoT.

Browse Industrial IoT Hub

About the Expert

II
Industrial Iot

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Industrial IoT and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512