Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to Industries

Education Technology

Just Thinking… About Federal Funds, Student Support, and the Future of Education with Eric Reaves

Federal education leaders face growing uncertainty around Department of Education restructuring and how federal funds will be managed and distributed. Schools serving historically underserved students depend heavily on programs like Title I and the National School Lunch Program, making strong compliance and program oversight critical to ensuring dollars reach students most in need.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By MarketScale · Education InnovationEducation ReformEducational EquityEric Reaves
Share

Key takeaways

01

As conversations around the future of the U.S.

02

Department of Education continue to intensify, educators and federal program leaders are facing mounting uncertainty about how federal funds will be managed, distributed, and regulated.

03

At the same time, schools serving historically underserved students remain heavily reliant on programs like Title I and other federally supported initiatives…

As conversations around the future of the U.S. Department of Education continue to intensify, educators and federal program leaders are facing mounting uncertainty about how federal funds will be managed, distributed, and regulated. At the same time, schools serving historically underserved students remain heavily reliant on programs like Title I and other federally supported initiatives to close learning gaps and provide critical services. In 2024, nearly three-quarters of public-school lunches were served free or at a reduced price through the National School Lunch Program, underscoring just how many students depend on federally supported services that reach far beyond academics.

But as policies shift and compliance requirements evolve, how can school leaders ensure federal dollars are still reaching the students who need them most? And perhaps more importantly, how can educators remain focused on the human stories behind the funding formulas?

On this episode of Just Thinking, host Kevin Dougherty sits down with Eric Reaves, Acting Director of the National Association of Federal Education Program Administrators (NAFEPA), for a deeply personal and timely conversation about federal education funding, leadership, resilience, and the life-changing power of mentorship. Together, they explore the evolving landscape of federal education programs, the growing need for compliance and guidance amid regulatory uncertainty, and the personal experiences that shaped Reaves’ passion for serving students and educators alike.

Key takeaways from the episode…

  • Federal education leaders are navigating unprecedented uncertainty as discussions around Department of Education restructuring raise questions about compliance, EDGAR regulations, and program oversight.
  • Student behavior often reflects unseen trauma, and educators must become better equipped to recognize the warning signs behind academic struggles and disengagement.
  • Mentorship, gratitude, and curiosity can transform lives, as Reaves reflects on the influential people who helped guide him from a difficult childhood to national educational leadership.

Eric Reaves currently serves as the Acting Director of NAFEPA, an organization dedicated to supporting K–12 federal education program administrators nationwide. With nearly 4,000 members, NAFEPA provides training, resources, and policy updates to professionals responsible for managing federal education funding and compliance. Reaves brings a unique perspective to the role, shaped not only by years of leadership and operational experience, but also by his own experiences growing up as a Title I student facing adversity at home. Before entering education leadership, Reaves built a successful career in the orthotic and prosthetic industry, where mentors and medical professionals helped cultivate his lifelong passion for learning, service, and people-centered leadership.

Article written by MarketScale.

Featured companies

New to MarketScale?

MarketScale is the platform Education Technology companies use to turn their own experts into content like this. Want the short overview?

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

Raptor Technologies has transitioned from visitor management to enhancing student well-being with its StudentSafe platform. This move addresses school district needs for improved behavioral threat assessment. StudentSafe is designed to bolster educational security and student safety.

  • 01Raptor Technologies is expanding into student well-being.
  • 02The StudentSafe platform focuses on behavioral threat assessment.
  • 03StudentSafe responds to demands from school district customers.

Jun 26, 2026

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

New York City schools have mandated that every AI tool undergo a bias and equity review before being deployed within their systems. This move comes amid broader concerns and debates about the role of AI in education, particularly concerning its impact on cognitive development. The education sector is actively assessing the potential benefits and risks associated with AI technologies in classrooms.

  • 01NYC schools require AI tools to pass a bias and equity review.
  • 02Concerns about AI in education include impacts on cognitive development.
  • 03Policymakers are reconsidering the place of AI in classrooms.

Jun 17, 2026

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

Twenty-nine New York City council members are demanding a two-year halt to AI use in the nation's largest school system, citing student data privacy gaps. Simultaneously, California and other states are tightening AI bias-audit requirements for employers, while educators debate a deeper question: whether AI adopted without guardrails erodes the original human thinking it is meant to support.

  • 01Twenty-nine NYC council members sent a letter on June 9, 2026, calling for a two-year AI moratorium in city schools, citing inadequate student data privacy protections in the Department of Education's drafted guidance.
  • 02California's Civil Rights Council AI regulations, effective Oct. 1, 2025, require employers using automated decision systems to retain related data for four years and face heightened litigation risk if they skip bias audits.
  • 03Educators and practitioners are wrestling with a fundamental design question: whether AI functions as a 'calculator'—executing tasks users already understand—or a 'crane' that extends human capacity into genuinely new territory.

Jun 17, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

About the Experts

M
MarketScale
ER
Eric Reaves

Eric Reaves is a federal programs leader and educator who works on issues related to federal funding distribution, student support, and Title I and similar programs serving historically underserved school communities.