Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEngineering & Construction

California’s Bullet Train Project Jumps in Cost

The first phase of the California High-Speed Rail Authority’s bullet train project have rocketed 35% ($2.8 billion) to total $10.6 billion. The project at large now carries a price tag of $67 billion, coming in well over the $40 billion cost that the authority promised to voters when they approved the project. The primary cause…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Engineering & Construction teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

Share

Free workspace

Turn your Engineering & Construction expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

The first phase of the California High-Speed Rail Authority’s bullet train project have rocketed 35% ($2. 8 billion) to total $10. 6 billion.

The project at large now carries a price tag of $67 billion, coming in well over the $40 billion cost that the authority promised to voters when they approved the project. The primary cause of the price spike was a result of the authority creating construction contracts before gaining key rights of way to move forward on the bullet train. Contractors blame the authority’s delays and internal mismanagement for their increasing expenditures.

The authority attributed the hurry to a September, 2017 deadline required to access Obama-era stimulus money. A growing cost has strengthened calls for an audit of the authority, which comes as state officials wait for a complete update on costs and a revised business plan. Both should arrive this spring.

Other bullet train initiatives around the country are looking to learn from the California authority’s mistakes. The $15 billion Houston-Dallas line recently received a draft environmental review from the Federal Railroad Administration, a key step forward. Developers on the project are seeing pushback from landowners, and advocacy groups against the project are encouraging landowners to be vocal about their opposition.

The chief concern is ecological, likely to prompt further studies that risk slowing the project down. That could mean a second bullet train project well over budget.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Engineering & Construction starts with a company putting its project engineers, superintendents, and estimators on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Owners shortlist firms they already trust, and your field leaders become the reason your name is on that list.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Engineering & Construction, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Engineering & Construction: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Engineering & Construction buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Engineering & Construction expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your project engineers, superintendents, and estimators into the articles, video, and social content Engineering & Construction buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Engineering & Construction Insights

NMHC survey: 37% raised pricing on projects on hold

NMHC survey: 37% raised pricing on projects on hold

NMHC's September construction survey found 37% of respondents repriced shelved projects upward, versus 17% in June. Starts slowed too: 29% of firms started fewer projects, and a growing share saw labor and material costs outrun inflation.

  • 01Upward repricing of projects held three to six months rose from 17% of survey respondents in June to 37% in September, while downward repricing fell from 38% to 14%.

Sep 28, 2026

CMHA’s 2026 report estimates paver and wall production

CMHA’s 2026 report estimates paver and wall production

CMHA's 2026 Hardscape Production Report combines confidential survey data from 41 manufacturers with broader industry estimates to track segmental concrete pavement and retaining wall production in the US and Canada.

  • 01CMHA surveyed 26 pavement and 38 segmental retaining wall (SRW) producers, with many making both products, combining confidential data with broader industry estimates.
  • 02NALP forecasts mild to moderate 2026 growth with regional variation, as inflation pressures consumers and landscapers struggle to hire qualified crews and maintain margins.
  • 03Manufacturers expect future product innovation around sustainability, stormwater management, design flexibility, and installation efficiency.

Sep 28, 2026

EPA $251M loan to help fund Pure Water Project

EPA $251M loan to help fund Pure Water Project

EPA approved a $251 million WIFIA loan for the Pure Water Project, an advanced purification plant in Los Angeles and Ventura counties expected to add capacity and reliability for about 105,000 customers and provide the region’s first local water supply. Under WIFIA terms, deferring principal until construction is substantially complete is expected to save about $13.6 million.

  • 01The $251 million Pure Water loan includes deferred principal payments following substantial completion of construction, a structure EPA expects to save about $13.6 million over the life of the loan.
  • 02For a utility planning potable reuse, the repayment calendar is a benchmark worth asking for alongside the interest rate and the loan size.

Sep 27, 2026

Explore More Engineering & Construction Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Engineering & Construction.

Browse Engineering & Construction Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Engineering & Construction and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512