Why are US OEMs struggling to cut EV manufacturing costs?

US OEMs are largely still relying on legacy production systems designed for internal combustion engine vehicles, which are not optimized for EV manufacturing. These outdated methods introduce inefficiencies and higher per-unit costs compared to competitors who built EV-focused production lines from the ground up.

What does a volume-driven strategy mean for EV manufacturing?

A volume-driven strategy means scaling production to a level where per-unit costs decrease significantly through economies of scale. By producing more units, manufacturers can spread fixed costs over a larger output, negotiate better component pricing, and optimize supply chains — all of which reduce the final cost of each vehicle.

How do global competitors compare to US OEMs in EV cost efficiency?

Global competitors, especially Chinese automakers, have aggressively invested in purpose-built EV manufacturing infrastructure and high-volume production from early on. This has allowed them to achieve significantly lower production costs per vehicle, putting pressure on US OEMs who are still transitioning away from legacy platforms.

‹ Back to Industries Engineering & Construction

US OEMs Must Streamline Existing Systems and Apply Volume-Driven Strategies to Cut EV Manufacturing Costs

US OEMs face mounting pressure to overhaul legacy manufacturing processes and adopt volume-driven cost strategies to remain competitive in the global EV market. American automakers must streamline existing production systems and leverage scale economics to close the cost gap with aggressive international rivals. Failure to adapt risks ceding significant market share to foreign competitors who have already embraced these efficiencies.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Engineering & Construction teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

Promoted content from Experts Talk on MarketScale.

By Dave Tuttle · May 3, 2024, 9:47 PM UTCDave TuttleEv Global MarketEv Manufacturing CostMichael Davies

Key takeaways

Legacy production methods are a primary cost disadvantage for US OEMs in EV manufacturing.

Volume-driven strategies and scale economics are essential for reducing EV production costs.

Global competitors, particularly from Asia, have already implemented cost-efficient EV manufacturing at scale.

As the electric vehicle (EV) market continues to expand, US original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) face significant challenges in reducing manufacturing costs to remain competitive. With growing global competition, particularly from countries like China that benefit from massive subsidies and a fresh industrial slate, the urgency for US manufacturers to adapt has never been more critical.

The urgency for US manufacturers to adapt has never been more critical.

What strategies can US OEMs employ to effectively reduce costs and compete on the global stage in the EV market?

On an engaging episode of Expert's Talk, Michael Davies, the Founder & Data Scientist at Green Econometrics, and Dr. Dave Tuttle, a Research Associate at the Energy Institute at the University of Texas at Austin explore several key strategies and perspectives essential for US EV manufacturers. Davies believes that large production volumes and the "experience effect" are key to reducing costs in the EV industry while Dr. Tuttle adds that US car makers also need to manage their existing systems while transitioning to EVs. They both suggest that strategic policies can help US manufacturers compete globally.

Large production volumes and the "experience effect" are key to reducing costs in the EV industry.

Key Takeaways:

Volume-Driven Manufacturing: Increasing production volume is fundamental, as it distributes fixed costs over more units, potentially lowering the cost per unit.
Leveraging the Experience Effect: Rapid assimilation and learning from existing manufacturing processes can drive efficiencies, reducing waste and improving productivity.
Navigating Legacy Challenges: Unlike new players, US OEMs must balance innovation in EV technology with the management of existing legacy systems, a significant hurdle that requires strategic foresight.
Policy Support: There's a strong call for policy interventions that can help level the playing field, echoing the need for fair trade rather than protectionism.
Anticipating Industry Consolidation: With numerous players in the market, especially in regions like China, industry consolidation is inevitable. US manufacturers need strategic investments to not only survive but thrive amidst these changes.

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

How do I bring down my manufacturing cost? Primarily, that's gonna be volume driven, but it's also the experience effect. And and that is how quickly can I assimilate and learn from the processes to develop better efficiencies? And it's much tougher for domestic OEMs because they're not starting from a greenfield environment. As in China, you know, there there was no legacy, you know, products to have to worry about. You you can build, forget the production going, and you don't have to worry about protecting your your legacy systems. Whereas in in our country, you know, the OEMs are faced with a a real challenge, how to protect their margins on their legacy systems and how to adapt quickly to this changing environment with EVs. And interesting. There are also subsidies or massive subsidies in the Chinese auto industry to help propel EVs. And the last I heard, there were, say, four hundred different EV manufacturers. There's they're going to be consolidations. Those are some of the job programs. It'll winnow down to a lot smaller number. But the there's a strategy there because it's a strategic investment that the country wants, the Chinese Communist, party. And if if we don't help our industry in some way, at least level the playing field or protect it. And so I'm not I don't want to be a protectionist at all, but I believe in fair trade, but it I believe in free trade, but it needs to be fair trade. And we just need to be cognizant of what our US OEMs are going through and the competitive landscape to to be able to meet this onslaught.