Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEngineering & Construction

Comparing Vacuum Insulated Panels (VIPs) to Structured Insulated Panels (SIPs)

Ever wondered if you could use the insulation technology used in your YETI in a walk-in? The kind used in YETIs is vacuum-sealed insulation (VIP) which is also the same as what’s used in your refrigerator at home. This process works fine for those situations but not in commercial applications which is required to stand…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Engineering & Construction teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

Promoted content from KPS Global on MarketScale.

·
Share
Comparing Vacuum Insulated Panels (VIPs) to Structured Insulated Panels (SIPs)

Free workspace

Turn your Engineering & Construction expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Ever wondered if you could use the insulation technology used in your YETI in a walk-in? The kind used in YETIs is vacuum-sealed insulation (VIP) which is also the same as what’s used in your refrigerator at home. This process works fine for those situations but not in commercial applications which is required to stand up to building codes and environmental factors. Instead, the better option is structural insulated panels (SIPs). Let’s dig into why this is the case.

VIPs vs. SIPs

VIP construction uses gas-tight enclosures surrounding a rigid core. Air in this instance is evacuated. Membrane walls prevent any air infiltration. The rigid core could be made of fumed silica, aerogel, glass fiber, or perlite. This core supports the membrane walls and shields the walls against atmospheric pressure once all the air is gone. There are chemicals, known as getters, which collect gases from the membrane. These are then added to the VIPs with glass-fiber or form cores.

SIPs have a much different construction. The structure is considered sandwich-structured. First, there is an insulating layer of rigid core. It is sandwiched between two layers of structural board. This board can be made of many materials like sheet metal, foam, or even cement. You can compare the structural integrity of the SIP to an I-beam. The true difference is that the core of a SIP acts as a web. The sheathing is used as flanges. Overall, the workings of the SIP employ a vapor and air barrier solution.

VIPs Lack Structural Integrity

Even though your YETI seems tough, it would not pass structural integrity tests. While VIPs have a high R-value, they do not have the structural integrity of the SIP. If a VIP was used in a commercial setting, it would require additional steps after manufacturing to create the structural integrity before it could pass wind loads and other structural forces.

Even if you could envelop the VIP for structural integrity, any benefit would be lost in the installation. The vacuum is lost after any type of penetration (installing a jbox or a drain line). So, adding to it basically breaks the seal. Even worse, you wouldn’t necessarily know the seal was broken until maintenance issues arise, just as you don’t know you have a leaky roof until it rains.

SIPs Stand Up to Commercial Environments

SIPs have many different configurations and materials, but each one still brings structural integrity to the project. SIPs can perform against multiple types of challenges. From wind loads to air pressure, SIPs stand up to most any real-world occurrence they may face. This design ensures they will meet the needs of the commercial walk-in cooler industry. The foam creates a fused panel because it glues the frame and the metal together. The insulating panel is one integrated piece that provides the structural quality required.

SIP Foam Options

As mentioned above, foam is an important part of the SIP fused panel. There are two foam options most often used: polyurethane and extruded polystyrene (XPS). Polyurethane foam results in a lightweight, low cost amalgamated panel. The structure bonds and cures as one. Polyurethane is advantageous because if its high R-Value, which can be up to R-8.06 per inch thickness. It also retains high thermal performance better than alternatives. XPS is an inferior option and why KPS Global® uses polyurethane foam in its panels.

Get more detailed information on these two foam types in this comparison here and reach out to the experts at KPS Global to discuss the best product for your commercial application.

Read more at kpsglobal.com

KPS Global

Part of this channel

KPS Global

Insulated panel systems for every cold storage application.

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Engineering & Construction starts with a company putting its project engineers, superintendents, and estimators on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Owners shortlist firms they already trust, and your field leaders become the reason your name is on that list.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Engineering & Construction, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Engineering & Construction: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Engineering & Construction buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Engineering & Construction expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your project engineers, superintendents, and estimators into the articles, video, and social content Engineering & Construction buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Engineering & Construction Insights

Bain Capital's reported $250M minority investment values construction platform Kahua above $1B

Bain Capital's reported $250M minority investment values construction platform Kahua above $1B

Bain Capital's Tech Opportunities fund is putting a reported $250 million into Kahua at a valuation above $1 billion. The deal follows what Kahua says is $100 million in annualized revenue. The bet rests on owner-side program data, with AI features the next sign to watch for hospitals, ports and school builders.

  • 01Kahua is selling AI on the strength of the governed data owners already keep in it. That makes data quality and permissions the place to test any new AI feature it ships.

Oct 1, 2026

Element’s Charlotte lab makes tensile specimens from turbine blade roots

Element’s Charlotte lab makes tensile specimens from turbine blade roots

Element Materials Technology’s Charlotte lab wire-EDMs one-eighth-inch cylinders from the root of a turbine blade and low-stress grinds them into tensile specimens—work value stream manager Daniel Steele says he’s not aware other labs do at this size. The lab, which invested $3.2 million in 2019 according to Aerospace Manufacturing and Design, is adding creep and stress rupture frames under a lease signed in January.

  • 01The extraction know-how has a paper trail: Aerospace Manufacturing and Design reported in March 2019 that Element’s $3.2 million Charlotte investment included EDM plunge machines—and that Charlotte was the first Element lab to install them for extracting cylindrical specimen blanks.
  • 02Deloitte's November 2025 outlook put manufacturing construction spending down 7% year over year by July 2025, so a lab adding floor space and creep frames is growing inside one of the few pockets Deloitte flagged for expansion.

Sep 30, 2026

NMHC survey: 37% raised pricing on projects on hold

NMHC survey: 37% raised pricing on projects on hold

NMHC's September construction survey found 37% of respondents repriced shelved projects upward, versus 17% in June. Starts slowed too: 29% of firms started fewer projects, and a growing share saw labor and material costs outrun inflation.

  • 01Upward repricing of projects held three to six months rose from 17% of survey respondents in June to 37% in September, while downward repricing fell from 38% to 14%.

Sep 28, 2026

Explore More Engineering & Construction Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Engineering & Construction.

Browse Engineering & Construction Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Engineering & Construction and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512