Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEngineering & Construction

In-House Structural Analysis for Decorative Metal Panels

Decorative metal panel manufacturers are called upon, now more than ever before, to solve architectural solutions for exterior facades, screening, and overhead shade. These panels can be raw metals, made to rust, ornamental blacksmith work for artistic railings, or systems of panels designed to be installed easily and last as part of the architectural form….

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Engineering & Construction teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

Share
In-House Structural Analysis for Decorative Metal Panels

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Engineering & Construction?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Engineering & Construction coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Decorative metal panel manufacturers are called upon, now more than ever before, to solve architectural solutions for exterior facades, screening, and overhead shade. These panels can be raw metals, made to rust, ornamental blacksmith work for artistic railings, or systems of panels designed to be installed easily and last as part of the architectural form.

But whether a product is decorative or structural, the designer, contractor, and customer all need to consider how building code affects the products they might want to use in the new space.

Interior screens may only need to meet deflection standards, meaning how much the panels move when you push on them. Guardrails and pool enclosures require a maximum hole size in the panels. Overhead shade needs to consider snow loads. And cladding on the outside of a building needs to be sure to stay attached in strong winds.

The engineering required for any project can be a serious matter, where cutting corners can cause permitting delays until structural calculations are reviewed. The question then becomes, “Who is the best qualified party to provide those structural calcs?” Most commercial projects have a project engineer, who can put together the documents required for a state-licensed professional engineer to stamp the drawings, in some cases, stamping it themselves.

When reviewing all the products on a building, however, the question isn’t what each product is rated for, but rather, “What is the performance of the building, as a whole?” It’s the sum of the parts, and when a little artistic license of one thing adds to a little risk tolerance in another thing, the acceptable level of risk may outweigh the value of the aesthetics. But can’t any engineer just crunch the numbers to determine the qualifications of each decorative panel?

PARASOLEIL ENGINEER, MITCH ARTEAGA, AT TESTING FACILITY

In today’s manufacturing landscape, it is easier than ever to fabricate custom things, and decorative metal panels are no exception. The more predictable a metal panel is, the easier it is to understand its structural integrity. Solid panels are easy to engineer if the material and finish are known. Industrial “perf” and expanded metals are likewise easy panel characteristics in running its geometry through structural analysis for different weather conditions and load scenarios.

But the more unpredictable the panel is, with artistic cutouts, bends, or inconsistent perforations, the more a typical engineer is going to require “over-engineering” to take out the risk of unknowns and to avoid delays in getting on to the next job.

MAXIMUM PANEL DEFLECTION EXAGGERATED BY A FACTOR OF 5

Over-engineering means thicker panels, more structural support, more fasteners, and in the end, more dollars spent for the panel system and for installation. The way to reduce risk without increasing cost is to work with product manufacturers who have the experience (and software) to provide project guidance and structural calculations for each project, as needed.

Parasoleil has created a unique and decorative product with dependable lead-times, but their Design department staff also know that pretty things need to last, especially when it comes to architecture and public spaces. And between their project guidance that they walk clients through and the engineering built into their Project Creator software, it’s only fitting that their next step was to offer a structural calculation report, specific to their project, patterns, and panel assembly.

In-house structural analysis is not required for every project. Often, relying on a product-manufacturer’s experience for what looks best is enough. But when value-engineering for a project’s risk and cost meet the uncertainty of building code requirements and getting a certificate of occupancy, there’s no better partner than one who proves the performance of their own product with numbers.

Parasoleil is a Colorado-based manufacturer of architectural panel systems to filter light and frame space. They are the 2017 recipients of the “Advancer of the Year” award from the Colorado Advanced Manufacturer Alliance.

THE EARLY DAYS OF STRUCTURAL TESTING AT PARASOLEIL

Read more at parasoleil.com

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Engineering & Construction starts with a company putting its project engineers, superintendents, and estimators on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Owners shortlist firms they already trust, and your field leaders become the reason your name is on that list.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Engineering & Construction Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Engineering & Construction: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Engineering & Construction buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Engineering & Construction expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your project engineers, superintendents, and estimators into the articles, video, and social content Engineering & Construction buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Engineering & Construction Insights

FAB 40 highlights top U.S. metal fabricators, including acquisitive Cadrex

The Fabricator’s 2023 FAB 40 ranks U.S. metal fabricators by reported revenue. PR Newswire reported Cadrex Manufacturing Solutions debuted at No. 2 with $480 million in 2022 revenue after a series of acquisitions, while MEC again held No. 1 with $539.4 million.

  • 01PR Newswire reported Cadrex Manufacturing Solutions entered The Fabricator’s 2023 FAB 40 at No. 2 after a series of acquisitions.
  • 02MEC’s long-running No. 1 position, with $539.4 million in reported 2022 revenue, reinforces what scale and repeatable process look like at the top of the list, according to PR Newswire.
  • 03PR Newswire flagged both material price inflation and demand as drivers of record revenues, buyers should press suppliers on what portion of growth was pricing versus volume.

Sep 6, 2026

HUD backs a 24-month study on mass-timber modules that ship and stack faster

HUD backs a 24-month study on mass-timber modules that ship and stack faster

HUD funded a 24-month Washington State University project on hybrid mass-timber modular housing. It targets transportability and faster site assembly. A 2023 Journal of Building Engineering review says 2D modular CLT tends to ship farther and build faster than 3D.

  • 01If transportation is the cost driver, HUD’s study plan points straight at the spec: treat the truck interface, tie-downs, and lifting points as part of the structural module design, not afterthought hardware.
  • 02The most actionable design fork in the CLT modular literature is 2D versus 3D: according to a 2023 Journal of Building Engineering review, 2D modules are typically moved longer distances and assembled faster on average.
  • 03Owners who want future change-of-use optionality can start writing it into module grids and connection details now. HUD-backed research is explicitly testing modules that can be repurposed across occupancies over their lifetime.

Sep 6, 2026

HUD’s 24-month mass timber modular project goes after the cost driver: shipping the modules

HUD’s 24-month mass timber modular project goes after the cost driver: shipping the modules

HUD is funding a 24-month Washington State University project to redesign modular housing modules around transport and fast site assembly. Shipping is the design constraint. A 2023 Journal of Building Engineering review of 2009–2021 modular CLT projects suggests faster construction timelines, but logistics choices still decide feasibility.

  • 01In modular housing, transportation is becoming a first-order engineering spec, the module that is cheapest to build can still be the most expensive to move.
  • 02The 2023 review found 2D modular CLT projects were, on average, transported farther and built faster than 3D ones, so configuration choice shapes both transport reach and install time.

Sep 5, 2026

Explore More Engineering & Construction Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Engineering & Construction.

Browse Engineering & Construction Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Engineering & Construction and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512