Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

How Blended Water Supplies Impact Water Treatment

Where does my water come from? The source(s) of water supplied to cooling towers, boilers, and processes may vary greatly daily or even hourly. The impact this has on water systems must be closely monitored to avoid scale, deposits, corrosion, inefficient water usage, and other negative impacts on operational costs. The New York City water…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Where does my water come from?

The source(s) of water supplied to cooling towers, boilers, and processes may vary greatly daily or even hourly. The impact this has on water systems must be closely monitored to avoid scale, deposits, corrosion, inefficient water usage, and other negative impacts on operational costs.

The New York City water supply is a good example, providing over 1.2 billion gallons/day of domestic water to more than 8 million NYC residents, 1 million users from 4 upstate counties, and the city’s many visitors. The water system is made up of aqueducts, distribution pipes, reservoirs, and water tunnels offering a total system storage capacity of close to 550 billion gallons. There are three separate systems that bring water from upstate to the city to fit this need; the Croton, to the east of the Hudson River, and the Catskill and Delaware on the west.

What is in my water?

Since the opening of the Croton Water Filtration facility in May of 2015 water treatment professionals across the five boroughs have faced issues with a blended water supply. The neighborhoods of New York City often receive a combination of all three water supplies, the Croton, Catskill, and Delaware. Operational decisions about the City’s water supply, including the proportion of water from each of the systems, are often made on an hourly basis, creating a constantly changing chemistry of a building’s incoming water.

There is currently no formal notification system in place as to when a change in water supply might occur or what the blend could consist of. When Croton water is introduced to the system there could be areas within the same borough that are 100% Croton water or 100% Catskill/Delaware water, and others that are blended at varying percentages. Conductivity measurements are relied upon to gain an understanding of what water source you’re dealing with at each location throughout the city.

In general, the conductivity of the Catskill/Delaware supply is in the 90-100 µmho range while the conductivity of the Croton water is consistently in the 350-500 µmho range. For many facilities, when the make-up water has a conductivity greater than 100, it is assumed some level of blending is taking place. The chart below details some key differences in the inorganic chemistry of the water supplies:

How does this affect my water treatment?

From a water treatment perspective, fluctuating supply/makeup water sources present significant issues for system control. To understand this concept, it’s important to understand cycles of concentration (COC). Cooling tower cycles are typically controlled by the conductivity of the water in the system. When the conductivity reaches a predetermined set point, the controller bleeds water from the system and replaces it with fresh makeup water. The makeup water has a lower concentration of salts and dilutes the system water. With consistent makeup water, this control method is simple and quite effective because water treatment professionals can predict the levels of dissolved solids in the system water (important for inhibitor choice), determine hold times (the length of time the water stays in the system), and estimate water use.

Cooling tower treatment, for example, commonly bases the cycles of concentration calculation upon conductivity readings. The incoming city water conductivity is multiplied by the targeted number of cycles to use as the conductivity set point. Over-cycling could lead to issues with scale deposition when the concentration of dissolved solids gets above the saturation point. Under-cycling can lead to unnecessary water use, lower operational efficiency, and depending on control method, inaccurate inhibitor residuals. A constantly changing water supply makes it almost impossible to consistently maintain the targeted cycles for a specific system. This is particularly true when there is no way of knowing what type of water you could be receiving at a facility at any given time. Changing the chemistry of the makeup water also changes the target cycles. A varying water supply requires consistent on-site testing of the makeup water and an experienced water treatment professional to effectively manage the fluctuating conditions.

Chem-Aqua has the perfect blend of expertise and experience to manage your changing water demands. Contact a local representative today to review your water treatment program.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Advocate Health's Hugh Chatham draws 65 applicants for 12 surgical tech seats

Advocate Health's Hugh Chatham draws 65 applicants for 12 surgical tech seats

Hugh Chatham Health and Alleghany Health marked one year inside Advocate Health with a surgical technology program that drew 65 applicants for 12 seats. Year one also brought $11.3 million in pay and rewards, $19.3 million in capital and nearly 1,000 specialty transfers. Local training seats look like the next limit in Elkin.

  • 01In rural North Carolina, a new surgical technology program drew more than five applicants per seat, which points to training capacity, not interest, as the thing to expand.
  • 02Pay spending in the first year of a rural affiliation came to roughly 58% of the capital figure: $11.3 million in total rewards next to $19.3 million in capital.
  • 03Transfers outnumbered virtual specialty consults about 14 to 1 in year one, so the planned growth in virtual care is the year-two number worth tracking.

Nov 10, 2026

AI cuts cardiologists' echocardiogram review time by 46%

AI cuts cardiologists' echocardiogram review time by 46%

Late-breaking research presented November 9 at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2026 reported that AI-drafted preliminary echocardiogram reports were comparable to human drafts. Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes finalizing AI drafts versus 8.5 minutes without AI. The findings are a non-peer-reviewed abstract.

  • 01Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes finalizing AI-drafted echo reports versus 8.5 minutes without AI, about 46% less time.
  • 02Cardiologists made substantial changes to 50.6% of AI drafts and 49.7% of human drafts.
  • 03The research used 1,200 echocardiograms from 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California medical centers.

Nov 9, 2026

After Chicago: Did AI at AHA 2026 Pass Its Own Test?

After Chicago: Did AI at AHA 2026 Pass Its Own Test?

At AHA Scientific Sessions 2026 in Chicago, AI ECHO INSIGHT, WATCH-LV, PARAMOUNT and PROVAR+ showed gains in workflow efficiency, screening and treatment decisions, but none established a reduction in hard clinical events. The takeaway: the next test is proving these tools improve outcomes, especially in high-need populations, by connecting to established care.

  • 01AI ECHO INSIGHT cut echo reads 8.5 to 4.6 minutes, and PARAMOUNT changed treatment decisions, but no AI late-breaker showed fewer hard events.
  • 02ZEUS and Lp(a)HORIZON lowered their target biomarkers without reducing major cardiovascular events, a caution against treating algorithmic accuracy alone as proof of patient benefit.
  • 03Low-technology, team-based interventions such as CATCH in Colombia and Jamaica lowered blood pressure, showing the care systems AI tools must connect to.

Nov 9, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512