Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEngineering & Construction

A Shorter Work Week Could Look Much Different for Contractors vs. Employees

A shortened work week is gaining steam across the world, from Iceland to the US. Though most high profile debate is around standardizing a four-day work week, Bangalore fintech startup Splice wants to try something even more radical for its industry, and the global economy: a three-day work week. For Splice, the vision for…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Engineering & Construction teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

Share

A shortened work week is gaining steam across the world, from Iceland to the US. Though most high profile debate is around standardizing a four-day work week, Bangalore fintech startup Splice wants to try something even more radical for its industry, and the global economy: a three-day work week.

For Splice, the vision for a three-day work week would include salaries at 80% the going market rate, and setting an innovative standard for work-life balance without sacrificing on KPIs and growth. The workforce dynamics of the fintech industry at large bring up some pressing factors that would define success for a shorter work week. Like 2018 reporting showed, at Big Tech leader Google, contract workers outnumbered the directly employed workforce, meaning a substantial shadow workforce lifting tech companies to success while requiring less pay, less benefits, and less direct oversight.

With important distinctions between the 1099 workforce and a salaried employee, how could a standardized three-day workweek, or even four-day workweek, impact employer distinctions between independent contractors and employees? In turn, would this impact how they invest in contract labor vs. traditionally employed labor? Lauren Blair, lawyer with AutoInsuranceEZ.com, joined us to give her take, referencing her 25 years of experience in employment law.

More from Lauren Blair:

The impacts of a shortened workweek are different for employers and workers.

The most significant impact a shortened workweek could have on employers concerns the payment of hourly wages. The Fair Labor Standards Act requires covered employers to pay their employees no less than the federal minimum wage for each hour worked, and overtime pay (typically time and a half) for every hour worked over 40 hours.

So, if an employer shifts from a five-day workweek at 8 hours a day to a four-day workweek at 8 hours a day, the employer could require the four-day employee to work up to 8 additional hours before having to pay overtime pay. On the other hand, if the employer goes from a five-day workweek at 8 hours a day to a four-day workweek at 10 hours a day, then the employee would be entitled to overtime pay for any time worked past the 10th hour of the 4th day.

From the workers’ perspective, the impact of a shortened workweek depends on whether the daily hours increase or decrease. In addition to impacting overtime pay as discussed above, it impacts the quality of life. If an 8-hour a day worker changes from a five-day 40-hour week to a four-day 32-hour week, that could mean more time for the employee to spend with family, taking care of other business, and pursuing personal wellness activities.

If, however, the worker must work 10-hours for four days, then that could cause fatigue and burnout for the worker. Studies have shown that longer workdays increase the risk of drowsy driving and places employees at risk of driving home exhausted and injuring themselves or others.

Bio: Lauren Blair is a lawyer with AutoInsuranceEZ.com. She has over 25 years of experience in employment law.

Engineering & Construction: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Engineering & Construction buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Engineering & Construction expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's Engineering & Construction expertise into the articles, video, and social content B2B marketing buyers in your industry are searching for. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Engineering & Construction Insights

Global M&A hits $2.8 trillion in H1 2026, with mega-deals and AI infrastructure driving a concentrated surge

Global M&A hits $2.8 trillion in H1 2026, with mega-deals and AI infrastructure driving a concentrated surge

Global M&A activity reached $2.8 trillion in the first half of 2026, marking a 48% increase compared to the previous year. This surge was driven by large-scale mergers, investments in AI infrastructure, and corporate divestitures that are reshaping the industrial landscape.

  • 01Global M&A deal value hit $2.8 trillion in the first half of 2026.
  • 02The M&A surge was driven by mega-deals and investments in AI infrastructure.
  • 03Corporate divestitures significantly contributed to the reshaping of the industrial sector.

Jul 26, 2026

Global M&A hits $2.8 trillion in H1 2026, and industrial manufacturing is leading the strategic land grab

Global M&A hits $2.8 trillion in H1 2026, and industrial manufacturing is leading the strategic land grab

In the first half of 2026, global mergers and acquisitions (M&A) reached $2.8 trillion, with industrial manufacturing leading strategic expansions. Mega-deals over $10 billion now account for nearly 50% of the global deal volume, marking an all-time record. AI infrastructure and grid modernization are major factors driving this concentration of capital.

  • 01Mega-deals over $10 billion account for nearly 50% of global M&A deal volume.
  • 02Global M&A activity reached $2.8 trillion in the first half of 2026.
  • 03AI infrastructure and grid modernization are key drivers in M&A activity.

Jul 25, 2026

Roland Berger forecasts 6–9% annual growth as industrial automation capital spending accelerates through 2030

Roland Berger forecasts 6–9% annual growth as industrial automation capital spending accelerates through 2030

Roland Berger predicts a 6-9% annual increase in capital spending for industrial automation until 2030. The growth in automation is substantial, yet the current enthusiasm for humanoid robots does not match the actual implementation on factory floors.

  • 01Industrial automation is projected to see a 6-9% annual growth in capital spending through 2030.
  • 02The enthusiasm for humanoid robotics is outstripping the realities of their implementation in real-world manufacturing environments.
  • 03Analysts and executives agree that industrial automation is experiencing a resurgence.

Jul 25, 2026

Explore More Engineering & Construction Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Engineering & Construction.

Browse Engineering & Construction Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Engineering & Construction and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512