Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesBusiness Services

With China’s Economy in a Funk, International Investors May Find Better Luck in Japan

Uncertain economic signals from mainland Asia are pushing international capital toward alternative growth markets in the region

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Business Services teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Taylor Herzog · China EconomyInternational Investment StrategyJapan EconomyTaylor Herzog
Share

Key takeaways

01

Uncertain economic signals from mainland Asia are pushing international capital toward alternative growth markets in the region

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Business Services?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Business Services coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

Getting a gauge on China’s economy can feel like finding a needle in a haystack. As geopolitical and economic tensions rise between the U.S. and China, western economists more frequently signal a slumping Chinese economy and end of a growth era, while Chinese mainland analysts paint a more positive outlook for China’s long-term economic development plans. Regardless, this uncertainty isn't good news for international investors. There are still plenty of opportunities, though, and Japan might be a great place to start.

In the wake of China's supposed prolonged economic stagnation, investors should reevaluate their strategies for international investments, especially in developing economies. As the world's second-largest economy struggles to rebound post-COVID, a downturn in major Chinese stock indexes like the S&P China 500 and MSCI China is a cautionary tale. Diversification remains paramount; while spreading investments across industries and companies is essential, geographic diversification is equally crucial to mitigate risks and tap into global growth opportunities.

So, what role can investments in companies in developing economies play in a larger portfolio strategy in this current international and domestic economic climate?

Taylor Herzog, Founder and Chief Investment Officer at TYME Advisors, says the wise investor may want to seek opportunities in the Japanese market.

Taylor's Thoughts

"Relative to China, by the way, I think it's important to point out that the stagnation of the returns in the past three years isn't just the past three years. In fact, it's over the past 30 years. So, over basically trailing 30 years, the S&P is up 900% versus the China index being up 200%. That's despite China's GDP growth growing orders of magnitude more than the U.S., and they have more debt than we do. I think the point you're bringing up is important, but it's far more severe than just the past three years; it's the past 30, which I think speaks to the importance of your process and framework when you want to determine how to allocate profit. And that's both long and short.

The best way to approach it is to have a very large toolkit, which means are you capable to go across all asset classes geographies and take both directional positions, meaning long and short. If you can do all that, then your opportunity set is so much greater, and the odds of success are a lot higher. So, for example, in that specific case, we think right now Japan is a far better long choice than the U.S. So again, let's say for the past 30 years, their sales are only up about 1.1x, but their profits are up about 11x. And this compares to the U.S., which has 3x sales but only up 3x profits. So, from that perspective, it's far more attractive. Also, you could have those characteristics and pay a far lower earnings multiple relative to the U.S.

But this isn't just academic; it's also performance, too. If you look at the trailing ten years of history in Japanese equities, Japanese equities have outperformed both the U.S. and Europe and emerging markets by a large margin, meaning low double-digit rates of return for Japan versus mid to low single digits for all those other places I mentioned. Then add all that up, and that's combined with Japan effectively extinguishing on the corporate side their net debt versus the U.S., whose corporations have largely levered up. So, in terms of fundamentals, Japan has gotten higher quality across everything I just said, whereas the quality of the U.S. has degraded.

In terms of fundamentals, Japan has gotten higher quality across everything I just said, whereas the quality of the U.S. has degraded.
— Taylor Herzog, Founder and Chief Investment Officer at TYME Advisors

Also, I think it's important relative to what we talked about in interest rates; the U.S. built up all that debt during a ZERP environment. Now rates are higher, so that makes it far more fragile. And then, if you also look at just CEO compensation, Japan's CEO compensation relative to their average employee is about 50x, but that compares to the U.S. at 400x. So, this just shows you that Japanese equities are far more shareholder-friendly because they're not using shareholders as a means to extract wealth to pay the CEO. Add on top of all that, Japanese equities are increasing both their share buybacks and dividend payouts. This is all great for the common shareholder, and this was done while eliminating their net debt. And these are all amazing fundamental characteristics.

Then, on a macro level, Japanese labor productivity has annualized at 2.2% for the past 20 years, meaning they're more productive with their labor. For the same period, the U.S. is at zero. We look at that and just think with a good macroeconomic framework and being able to analyze on the bottom up, we look at this and think at this time by now, Japan is far more attractive relative to the U.S., especially in the context of where rates are."

Japan is far more attractive relative to the U.S., especially in the context of where rates are.
— Taylor Herzog, Founder and Chief Investment Officer at TYME Advisors

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Business Services starts with a company putting its consultants, practice leads, and account teams on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Clients hire the firm whose thinking they have already read, which means fewer cold conversations for your partners.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

Taylor Herzog
Taylor HerzogFounder, Shareholder, and Chief Investment Office

TYME Is On Your Side! If you are tired of one dimensional, static, impersonal, and indecipherable financial advice then visit tymeadvisors.com to join Taylor's insider's list to learn how TYME Is On Your Side with our multi disciplinary, real time, personalized, and understandable advice.

Follow Business Services Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Business Services: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Business Services buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Business Services expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your consultants, practice leads, and account teams into the articles, video, and social content Business Services buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Business Services Insights

Life insurers are pushing $2M ‘fluidless’ cases, and underwriting teams will feel it first

Life insurers are pushing $2M ‘fluidless’ cases, and underwriting teams will feel it first

Foresters Financial expanded its U.S. accelerated underwriting program effective April 26, raising limits to $2 million for ages 18–60 and $1 million for ages 61–65, and adding iPipeline iGO e-App pre-screening and broader eligibility, according to InsuranceNewsNet. In parallel, Concirrus and Applied Underwriters said they will launch SkyMiner in Q3 2026, positioning it as a conversational interface to enterprise knowledge with grounded, cited answers, according to Applied Underwriters’ June 29, 2026 announcement. Together, the moves signal that “fluidless” underwriting is shifting from an edge-case channel to a mainstream lane where underwriting operations, data governance, and producer workflow design determine cycle time as much as risk rules.

  • 01A $2 million accelerated underwriting ceiling changes what breaks first: not the model, but case triage, evidence ordering rules, and exception handling when a ‘fluidless’ file turns ‘fluid-required’ midstream.
  • 02The differentiator is moving to workflow surfaces producers actually use, Foresters tied AUW eligibility checks to iPipeline iGO e-App, while Concirrus and Applied Underwriters are betting on cited, verifiable answers to reduce internal back-and-forth.
  • 03These upgrades matter most for carriers and MGAs with fragmented underwriting knowledge across guidelines, memos, and historical case notes, because conversational layers increase speed only when the citations are governed and auditable.

Sep 2, 2026

Temp staffing is still a 2.2 million-worker weekly market, and the buyers are changing

Temp staffing is still a 2.2 million-worker weekly market, and the buyers are changing

The American Staffing Association (ASA) says about 2.2 million temporary and contract employees worked for US staffing companies in an average week in 2024, and staffing provided job and career opportunities for about 11 million employees that year. Staffing Industry Analysts reported ASA elected its 2026 board officers on Oct. 7, 2025, naming LaSalle Network’s Tom Gimbel as chair alongside executives from Allegis Group, Kelly, Adecco Group US Foundation and others. Taken together, the scale numbers and the new board roster point to an industry steering committee that spans industrial, professional, and healthcare staffing, right as enterprise operators are being asked to justify flexible labor programs with clearer performance and compliance metrics. For procurement, HR, and operations leaders, the practical consequence shows up in MSAs and SOWs being renegotiated now: rate structures, conversion and tenure terms, and skills coverage across higher-skilled roles that ASA says make up 40% of staffing assignments.

  • 01A useful planning benchmark is ASA’s 2024 weekly average of 2.2 million temp/contract workers, it’s a reality check for how much surge capacity the channel can supply at any given time.
  • 02The popular ‘flexibility’ story is often overstated: ASA reports 64% of staffing employees say they use the model to bridge jobs or land a job, versus 20% citing schedule flexibility. That gap should shape retention and conversion assumptions in workforce plans.
  • 03ASA’s own fact sheet mixes 2024/2023 workforce figures with 2021 counts of firms and offices, a reminder for buyers to ask suppliers what’s changed in branch footprint, specialization, and delivery model since those baselines.

Sep 2, 2026

AI agents are spreading fast, but most firms still can’t price the gain

AI agents are spreading fast, but most firms still can’t price the gain

Survey data in 2026 shows AI adoption accelerating in professional services, recruiting, and financial services, but measurement and pricing are lagging. Thomson Reuters reported organization-wide AI use rose to 40% in 2026 from 22% in 2025, while only 18% of organizations track AI ROI, even as 74% of professionals use AI several times a week. Staffing Industry Analysts reported 61% of staffing firms now use AI in recruiting operations, yet SHRM benchmarking still pegs average non-executive cost per hire at $4,700, with cold outreach response rates down 27% amid higher send volume. WealthManagement, citing NVIDIA’s 2026 survey of 800+ financial services professionals, reported 65% of firms are actively using AI and nearly 100% expect budgets to stay flat or increase, while agentic AI’s main blockers are reliability (34%) and internal skills gaps (33), making governance, instrumentation, and commercial terms the next operational battleground.

  • 01A useful benchmark for internal audits: Thomson Reuters found only 18% of organizations track AI ROI, even while firm-wide AI adoption hit 40% in 2026 and individual use reached 74%.
  • 02AI efficiency gains are getting competed away where the bottleneck is attention, not labor. Staffing Industry Analysts reported cold outreach response rates fell 27% as AI-driven messaging volume rose, while average cost per hire stayed around $4,700.
  • 03Agentic AI deployments are moving into production in regulated environments. NVIDIA’s financial services survey shows 21% have deployed agents, but the top reported frictions are reliability (34%) and skills to manage them (33%), which should show up as budget lines for monitoring and model operations, not just software licenses.

Sep 2, 2026

Explore More Business Services Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Business Services.

Browse Business Services Hub

About the Expert

Taylor Herzog
Taylor Herzog

Founder, Shareholder, and Chief Investment Office

TYME Is On Your Side! If you are tired of one dimensional, static, impersonal, and indecipherable financial advice then visit tymeadvisors.com to join Taylor's insider's list to learn how TYME Is On Your Side with our multi disciplinary, real time, personalized, and understandable advice.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Business Services and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512