Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEngineering & Construction

White House Optimistic About New Infrastructure Deal

Heather Boushey, member of the U.S. Council of Economic Advisers, says the Biden administration is optimistic about the infrastructure deal struck with a bipartisan group of senators. Watch below for more on the recent deal. Host: Let’s talk about first the bipartisan part of this and what this accomplishes, how much of the president’s plan…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Engineering & Construction teams put it to work with Partner & Channel Enablement.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Engineering & Construction expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Heather Boushey, member of the U.S. Council of Economic Advisers, says the Biden administration is optimistic about the infrastructure deal struck with a bipartisan group of senators. Watch below for more on the recent deal.

Host: Let’s talk about first the bipartisan part of this and what this accomplishes, how much of the president’s plan this gets done, assuming this does, in fact, make it through congress?

Boushey: Well, that’s a big if, but we remain very optimistic, very exciting yesterday to see Republicans and Democrats come together on infrastructure plan. That could be a game changer for American industry and for the American economy. And we desperately need these investments all across the country in basic infrastructure, roads and bridges. And of course, the plan included making sure that we replace those lead pipe so that people can get clean drinking water, as well as investments in electric vehicle charging stations all across the country. These are the kinds of investments that our economy needs in order to thrive. So that businesses can thrive and hire workers and make sure that America gets back to work and stays at work.

Host: Talk about the lead pipes. I must say, this is a pet issue of mine because I’ve read some about it from Westmore and we tend to think about roads and bridges and railroads as being infrastructure. We don’t think about the effect on our children often, often on their cognitive development because of lead pipes. Explain what this could do, the economy in terms of really bringing along the next generation of Americans.

Boushey: Well, you know, some of this very basic infrastructure, water, sewers, you know, so many of us take for granted. But yet for so many communities across these United states, people simply can’t turn on the pipe and know that that water is safe to drink. There is no amount of lead in water that is safe for young children.

It leads to brain damage and developmental problems. And those are both expensive for families and communities and government to help those families cope to that. And we are one of the richest countries in the world.

We should be able to make sure that every American has access to safe drinking water. This is an investment in our future and investment in American business. Those businesses, if they don’t know that the water is clean and safe, they may not choose to invest in that community.

So this is certainly a win for the economy as well as so important for children and families.

Host: So this is a fair amount of what President Biden originally proposed. As I said, it’s not all of it by any means. There is what I think the president calls the human infrastructure part of it. There was talk about that at the White House yesterday, that somehow this is contingent upon that. Give us a sense of what this leaves out, what is left to be done.

Boushey: Certainly in the American Jobs Plan and the American families plan that the president laid out in the spring include investments in things like home health care, in child care, in establishing a nationwide paid family medical leave program, investments in moving towards universal pre-kindergarten, as well as an expansion extending the expansion of the child tax credit. So it is really important that those pieces remain a part of the plan because they’re so important to American families.

And these are also important to American business. And the president made clear yesterday that there is a two pronged strategy. So this bipartisan bill that has these core pieces that Republicans and Democrats agree are important on, that has one path.

But then these other pieces, which around the country, Republicans and Democrats agree are important but isn’t a part of the package. The president is committed to making sure that those go through another congressional vehicle.

I think just I just want to underscore that both of these pieces are economically critical. We need to be making investments in young people and in care and in those care workers because so many Americans hold those jobs. We need to make sure that those are good jobs.

—

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @MarketScale

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Video TranscriptExpand ↓

Let's talk about first the bipartisan part of this and what this accomplishes, how much of the president's plan this gets done, assuming this does, in fact, make it through congress? Well, that's a big if, but we remain very optimistic, very exciting yesterday to see Republicans and Democrats come together on infrastructure plan. That could be a game changer for American industry and for the American economy. And we desperately need these investments all across the country in basic infrastructure, roads and bridges. And of course, the plan included making sure that we replace those lead pipe so that people can get clean drinking water, as well as investments in electric vehicle charging stations all across the country. These are the kinds of investments that our economy needs in order to thrive. So that businesses can thrive and hire workers and make sure that America gets back to work and stays at work. Talk about the lead pipes. I must say, this is a pet issue of mine because I've read some about it from Westmore and we tend to think about rojos roads and bridges and railroads as being infrastructure. We don't think about the effect on our children often, often on their cognitive development because of lead pipes. Explain what this could do, the economy in terms of really bringing along the next generation of Americans. Well, you know, some of this very basic infrastructure, water, sewers, you know, so many of us take for granted. But yet for so many communities across these United states, people simply can't turn on the pipe and know that that water is safe to drink. There is no amount of lead in water that is safe for young children. It leads to brain damage and developmental problems. And those are both expensive for families and communities and government to help those families cope to that. And we are one of the richest countries in the world. We should be able to make sure that every American has access to safe drinking water. This is an investment in our future and investment in American business. Those businesses, if they don't know that the water is clean and safe, they may not choose to invest in that community. So this is certainly a win for the economy as well as so important for children and families. So so this is a fair amount of what President Biden originally proposed. As I said, it's not all of it by any means. There is what I think the president calls the human infrastructure part of it. There was talk about that at the White House yesterday, that somehow this is contingent upon that. Give us a sense of what this leaves out, what is left to be done, certainly in the American Jobs Plan and the American families plan that the president laid out in the spring include investments in things like home health care, in child care, in establishing a nationwide paid family medical leave program, investments in moving towards universal prekindergarten, as well as an expansion extending the expansion of the child tax credit. So it is really important that those pieces remain a part of the plan because they're so important to American families. And these are also important to American business. And the president made clear yesterday that there is a two pronged strategy. So this bipartisan, bipartisan bill that has these core pieces that Republicans and Democrats agree are important on that has one path. But then these other pieces, which around the country, Republicans and Democrats agree are important but isn't a part of the package. The president is committed to making sure that those go through another congressional vehicle. So, yeah, sorry. Please go ahead. I think just I just want to underscore that both of these pieces are economically critical. We need to be making investments in young people and in care and in those care workers because so many Americans hold those jobs. We need to make sure that those are good jobs. One of the issues has been how we pay for the infrastructure investment with the Bipartisan party that basically we figured out a way to do it without really increasing taxes. It's different for the partisan, if I can call it that way, the possible reconciliation alternatives. Give us your sense about growth, GDP growth and the effect of taxation on that, because some economists are concerned that if we do increase taxation, that actually will inhibit some of the growth that you want to have because of the infrastructure investment. Well, here's the thing, David. Core pieces of the president's tax agenda are focused on doing some of the distortionary taxes that were put in place as a part of the 2017 tax cuts and Jobs Act. And that legislation, you know, encouraged firms to shift profits overseas, to ship jobs overseas. And in fact, you know, while the American people were promised that that tax relief would lead to greater investment, we saw pre pandemic that it did not. A series of research papers showed that those massive tax cuts did not lead to the promised increase in investment. That means it wasn't good for growth, essentially. So what we want to do is make sure that we are focused on a tax system that is fair, that rewards work and not wealth. And it make sure that those who had the most capacity to pay, those who benefited the most from growth in our economy. Those who have made the most gains that they pay their fair share so that we can have these much needed investments across our economy that benefit everyone and importantly benefit businesses just as much as they benefit American families. I think an important question on everyone's mind is, insofar as you are increasing some taxes, is it for the purposes of fairness and equity sort of a redistribution or is it actually part of the growth strategy? That's a great question, David. And I would say it's a little bit of both. You know, I think there's a lot of research out there now that shows that this widening economic inequality, especially the extreme wealth inequality, is not necessarily good for growth. It can be destabilizing and it means that investments may not be focused on their best purpose for our society. So we want to make sure that both our government spending and the way that we collect revenues really encourages the kinds of investments that make America more competitive. They're going to support American workers and grow and build America's middle class. So that should be the goal. And I think that we can get to a better tax system that gets us there through the reforms that the president has outlined over the past couple of months.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Engineering & Construction starts with a company putting its project engineers, superintendents, and estimators on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Owners shortlist firms they already trust, and your field leaders become the reason your name is on that list.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Engineering & Construction, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Engineering & Construction: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Engineering & Construction buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Engineering & Construction expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your project engineers, superintendents, and estimators into the articles, video, and social content Engineering & Construction buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Engineering & Construction Insights

Why Momentive says city data centers need sealant built for 1,000-foot towers

Why Momentive says city data centers need sealant built for 1,000-foot towers

Planners are pushing urban data centers toward glass facades. Bull argues high-load structural silicone glazing—like the 30 psi UltraGlaze SSG4600 used on Austin’s 1,025-foot Waterline tower—can help support heavier security glass and tighter enclosure performance in new multi-story builds.

  • 01When a city insists a data center look like an office building, the sealant holding the glass ends up doing work for the cooling plant.
  • 02Rifle-rated UL 752 Level 7 glazing runs about 15 pounds per square foot, so the security rating and the sealant's 30 psi design strength belong in the same specification review.
  • 03The supertall-sealant case applies mainly to new urban builds; most operating U.S. data centers can't shut down for facade replacement and harden their glass through retrofit shields instead.

Nov 13, 2026

IndexBox sees panelized buildings growing 5.3% a year if panel plants keep up

IndexBox sees panelized buildings growing 5.3% a year if panel plants keep up

IndexBox forecasts the global panelized buildings market to grow 5.3% a year from 2026 to 2035, with residential housing at about 45% of 2026 demand. Factory capacity is the catch. Limited mass timber and specialized steel framing capacity will hold growth back in some regions, and IndexBox expects investment in new plants and automation to ease those bottlenecks by the late 2020s.

  • 01Panels swap scarce framing crews for factory hours, and through the late 2020s the factory hours for mass timber and specialized steel framing are scarce too.
  • 02Housing is 45% of panelized demand, but commercial and institutional projects are expected to grow faster because owners are paying for schedule certainty; warehouse and campus owners are closest to that shift.
  • 03Mid-scale volumetric modular plants are estimated to need 60% to 70% utilization to break even; panel lines use different equipment, but the report argues the same fixed-cost logic can make order-book visibility important before adding shifts or lines.

Nov 11, 2026

Requests for Paebbl's carbon-storing cement substitute far outstrip what it can produce

Requests for Paebbl's carbon-storing cement substitute far outstrip what it can produce

Rebond 300 replaces up to 30% of cement in concrete with no equipment changes. In a Holcim and Goldbeck floor slab trial at C30/37, its workability, setting time and finishing matched the reference mix. Demand exceeds what Paebbl can produce, and closing that gap is now its main challenge.

  • 01After Rebond 300 runs through a standard ready-mix plant and hits C30/37 with no schedule change, buyers’ next questions shift to supply and allocation—how many tonnes Paebbl can ship—alongside price and how much of the mix to commit.
  • 02If Rebond 300 displaces up to 30% of cement yet can cut embodied carbon by up to 40%, the figures imply a negative footprint beyond simple substitution; Paebbl cites a verified -149 kg CO2e per tonne of product, with results depending on mix design.

Nov 11, 2026

Explore More Engineering & Construction Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Engineering & Construction.

Browse Engineering & Construction Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Engineering & Construction and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512