Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

CHLOE 5: The Pivot to Remote Teaching in Spring 2020 and Its Impact

In response to this year’s unprecedented shift to remote learning, Quality Matters and Eduventures Research issued a special edition of the annual Changing Landscape of Online Education (CHLOE) Survey. CHLOE 5: A Special Pandemic Survey was administered to 308 chief online officers (COO) representing 2- and 4-year public, private and for-profit institutions. The results —…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share
CHLOE 5: The Pivot to Remote Teaching in Spring 2020 and Its Impact

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Education Technology?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Education Technology coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

In response to this year’s unprecedented shift to remote learning, Quality Matters and Eduventures Research issued a special edition of the annual Changing Landscape of Online Education (CHLOE) Survey. CHLOE 5: A Special Pandemic Survey was administered to 308 chief online officers (COO) representing 2- and 4-year public, private and for-profit institutions.

The results — available in CHLOE 5: The Pivot to Remote Teaching in Spring 2020 and Its Impact — send a strong message. While many colleges and universities are announcing a return to campus for the fall, COOs know that forms of remote learning will play a major role in a socially distanced student experience. Over 80% of COOs are working on specific improvement to remote learning plans, including conversion to true online learning:

  • Thirteen percent improving remote instruction courses that need it
  • Thirty-five percent planning incremental improvement for all remote instruction courses
  • Eighteen percent gradually converting remote instruction courses to fully online learning
  • Seventeen percent converting all remote instruction courses to fully online learning

Only four percent of respondents indicated that their priority is returning to conventional in-person instruction as soon as feasible.

The report also provides insight into the successes, challenges and priorities for quality improvement related to remote learning, including the tools and technologies deployed.

Despite widely observed deficiencies in remote courses as compared to fully online courses, schools with greater online learning experience were more likely to be positive about the logistics and perceived success of spring remote learning.

According to Richard Garrett, Eduventures Chief Research Officer and co-lead of the project, “The biggest challenge institutions faced was a lack of preparation — with many institutions reporting that neither faculty nor students were prepared for the sudden, unexpected pivot. Time was another issue. The need for academic continuity allowed for only a cursory conversion of courses.”

“While chief online officers acknowledge specific challenges, the majority portray a largely positive view of online learning in the wake of the pandemic crisis. Many also expressed optimism about the future of online learning, which should reassure the online community that some benefit will come from their hard work in these perilous times,” said Ron Legon, QM Executive Director Emeritus and co-lead of the CHLOE project.

As institutions look ahead and plan for the possibility that remote instruction or expanded online learning will continue into fall 2020 and beyond, COOs are outlining their priorities, which include:

  • Providing enhanced faculty development and training
  • Employing common tools and technologies
  • Setting minimum expectations for faculty-student interaction

“The CHLOE Report is the only publicly available resource that provides an unfiltered view of the online learning landscape through the lens of today’s higher education decision makers,” said Brad Gibbs, Chief Growth Officer at Archer Education, a CHLOE 5 platinum sponsor. “In our charter to accelerate growth for our partner institutions, Archer relies on the report for guidance in developing innovative marketing and enrollment services and strategies that align with the top opportunities and trends impacting today’s colleges and universities.”

This report was made possible through the support of platinum sponsors iDesign and Archer Education.

The principal authors of the report are Richard Garrett (Eduventures Research) and Ron Legon (Quality Matters) with contributing editors Eric Fredericksen (University of Rochester) and Bethany Simunich (Quality Matters).

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Education Technology Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

Schools are buying AI fast, but their contracts still can’t show it helps

Schools are buying AI fast, but their contracts still can’t show it helps

Schools are rapidly increasing their spending on AI technology, yet there is a lack of evidence in their contracts proving that these tools effectively enhance learning. Utah and Los Angeles Unified School District are implementing screen-time regulations, necessitating a closer scrutiny of AI tools' actual educational benefits. The challenge remains in identifying which AI tools lead to measurable improvements for students.

  • 01AI spending in schools is increasing despite unclear evidence of its educational benefits.
  • 02Screen-time regulations in Utah and LAUSD are prompting schools to evaluate the efficacy of AI tools.
  • 03There is a need for educational tools that can clearly demonstrate an improvement in student learning outcomes.

Aug 29, 2026

Education Department’s 5-question edtech check is now the fastest way to buy

Education Department’s 5-question edtech check is now the fastest way to buy

New federal guidance has streamlined the procurement process for educational technology by requiring evidence of instructional impact, setting usage rules, and showing evidence before renewing contracts. This initiative aims to ensure that technology investments in education are effective and utilized appropriately. The guidance focuses on turning screen time considerations into actionable procurement inquiries.

  • 01New federal guidance requires proving the instructional impact of edtech before procurement.
  • 02Usage rules must be set for educational technology to be considered for purchase.
  • 03Evidence must be shown before renewing edtech contracts to ensure its effective use.

Aug 28, 2026

K-12 AI spending is moving from classroom apps to vetting, policy, and proof

K-12 AI spending is moving from classroom apps to vetting, policy, and proof

K-12 districts are increasing their spending on AI tools, shifting focus from classroom applications to areas like vetting, policy-making, and outcome validation. The primary challenge now lies in the operational aspects of these implementations rather than just acquiring new technologies.

  • 01K-12 districts are shifting AI spending towards vetting, policy-making, and outcome validation instead of classroom applications.
  • 02Operational challenges include developing effective policies and proof of effectiveness for AI tools.
  • 03The transition indicates a move towards more strategic integration of AI in educational environments.

Aug 27, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512