Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to Industries

Education Technology

How Educators Explore the Strategy of Implementation in Classrooms

There are various types of teaching methods available for educators to pick and choose from. However, picking the one that not only works best for their students, but is also effective, is another factor to consider. Regarding the science of reading, which is a wide- ranging discipline inclusive of both reading and writing, there…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Promoted content from The Future of Education with Michael Horn on MarketScale.

Share

 
There are various types of teaching methods available for educators to pick and choose from. However, picking the one that not only works best for their students, but is also effective, is another factor to consider. Regarding the science of reading, which is a wide- ranging discipline inclusive of both reading and writing, there are several types of ways to implement it in teaching methods.

While there’s not always a ‘right’ way to implement new methods when it comes to teaching, how do educators go about introducing novel ways of implementation in their classrooms? In the newest episode of Future of Education, host Michael Horn interviewed Anthony Kim, the founder and CLO of Education Consulting and Professional Development Services at Education Elements, about the implementation of the science of reading.

Kim mentioned that while some educators prefer to utilize variation when it comes to their curriculum, others might want a single program used nationwide. But a single program can come with its faults, according to Ed Week.

“When we think about implementing something as comprehensive as a reading ELA program, and what I see happening right now are a lot of debates classroom to classroom, building to building, state to state, whether one program approach is better than the other and there’s probably some variation,” said Kim.

He added that many educators shared differing perspectives on the pros and cons of implementing new strategies.

“I’ve talked to some academics and professors that like are arguing the benefits of both. One, they say is easier to implement and so easier to adopt as well, and others more complicated to implement and also takes a lot of like of road development of students and so the reason it shifted to one form or the other is because kind of the movement and the trend kind of shift because something was hard to do … and so now we’re at a place where something that seemed easier actually doesn’t seem to be producing the results that they had hoped. So, now they like, ‘Okay, let’s go back to this other thing,’ and there’s this whole debate now,” said Kim.

Horn and Kim also discussed …

Innovative programming with successful and unsuccessful implementation strategies

Professional learning communities

The best practices when it comes to implementation

“For anything to be implemented well there needs to be a system of implementation … There’s a way in which we see this thing being implemented [science of reading] well, that seems to have more stickiness and the momentum building that we started to see in things like blended learning and personalized learning, but didn’t continue on,” said Kim.

Anthony Kim is the founder and the CLO of Education Consulting and Professional Development Services at Education Elements. He started the company 12 years ago in Las Vegas. Kim is also the CLO at Scholarus Learning and has been for more than a year. He is also an author, speaker, and coach, and a graduate of Cornell University.

The Future of Education with Michael Horn

Part of this channel

The Future of Education with Michael Horn

Michael Horn interviews the people redesigning how students learn

Visit the channel →

New to MarketScale?

MarketScale is the platform Education Technology companies use to turn their own experts into content like this. Want the short overview?

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

Raptor Technologies has transitioned from visitor management to enhancing student well-being with its StudentSafe platform. This move addresses school district needs for improved behavioral threat assessment. StudentSafe is designed to bolster educational security and student safety.

  • 01Raptor Technologies is expanding into student well-being.
  • 02The StudentSafe platform focuses on behavioral threat assessment.
  • 03StudentSafe responds to demands from school district customers.

Jun 26, 2026

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

New York City schools have mandated that every AI tool undergo a bias and equity review before being deployed within their systems. This move comes amid broader concerns and debates about the role of AI in education, particularly concerning its impact on cognitive development. The education sector is actively assessing the potential benefits and risks associated with AI technologies in classrooms.

  • 01NYC schools require AI tools to pass a bias and equity review.
  • 02Concerns about AI in education include impacts on cognitive development.
  • 03Policymakers are reconsidering the place of AI in classrooms.

Jun 17, 2026

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

Twenty-nine New York City council members are demanding a two-year halt to AI use in the nation's largest school system, citing student data privacy gaps. Simultaneously, California and other states are tightening AI bias-audit requirements for employers, while educators debate a deeper question: whether AI adopted without guardrails erodes the original human thinking it is meant to support.

  • 01Twenty-nine NYC council members sent a letter on June 9, 2026, calling for a two-year AI moratorium in city schools, citing inadequate student data privacy protections in the Department of Education's drafted guidance.
  • 02California's Civil Rights Council AI regulations, effective Oct. 1, 2025, require employers using automated decision systems to retain related data for four years and face heightened litigation risk if they skip bias audits.
  • 03Educators and practitioners are wrestling with a fundamental design question: whether AI functions as a 'calculator'—executing tasks users already understand—or a 'crane' that extends human capacity into genuinely new territory.

Jun 17, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub