Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEducation Technology

How Higher Ed Must Adapt to Survive

The more data that drops, the clearer the message for institutes of higher learning—in order to keep pace with today’s society, operations must change. In this episode, Kshitij Nerurkar, Education Business Leader at Cognizant, drills down on his numbers for further evidence. Cognizant last week released the findings of its study, “The Work Ahead…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Education Technology expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

The more data that drops, the clearer the message for institutes of higher learning—in order to keep pace with today’s society, operations must change. In this episode, Kshitij Nerurkar, Education Business Leader at Cognizant, drills down on his numbers for further evidence.

Cognizant last week released the findings of its study, “The Work Ahead in Higher Ed: Repaving the Road for the Employees of Tomorrow.” The study reveals disruption for students and educators caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has only just begun with 45% of educators surveyed believe the pace is accelerating.

With the sudden pivot to online and hybrid learning, and the renewed awareness of education inequities, higher education is now in the throes of a major reinvention. Increasingly, educators need to examine the rigid, lengthy approach to how students learn and earn a degree over their academic careers. The study uncovers the need for a more fluid, flexible and personalized approach to education in order to meet the new ways students will engage with professors and achieve academic success.

“The role of the modern university is being disrupted,” said Kshitij Nerurkar, Education Business Leader, Cognizant. “The pandemic has shined a spotlight on many inequities and challenges that higher education institutions are facing as they pivot to new ways of teaching students. Students are not interested in sitting in classrooms anymore and taking exams. To prepare the next generation of students will require institutions to be more flexible and adopt new technologies and digital modes of education delivery.”

With the new and ever-changing skills required to meet the rise of AI, analytics and automation in the workplace, students are now faced with the prospect of having not one but multiple careers in their lifetime, making the traditional linear model of education-employment-career inadequate.

Technologies such as hyperconnectivity, artificial intelligence (AI) and big data/analytics will help Higher Ed institutions adopt to the new ways of learning. These technologies will create a new path for educators to teach, but they will need to be re-trained to elevate their skills as machines take on more repetitive tasks, such as administrative activities. Educators continue to be skeptical that this level of learning can be delivered.

The study highlights key educational and technology takeaways that institutions need to carry forward to provide a better student experience, including:

Intelligent Systems and Connectivity: more than half of respondents are doubtful their existing educational systems are ready for the adaptations needed. The greatest drivers of change are hyperconnectivity (45%), AI (42%) and analytics (42%), which will drive better student engagement, greater educational access, and personalization.

Adoption is Slow: while educators acknowledge the importance of these technologies, widespread implementation of AI and analytics are minimal, only 7% and 4%, respectively. The improvements so far, 29% being the higher end, have been small, but improvement is expected between now and 2023.

Financial Commitment: investments need to rise to reap much-needed gains. With an expected growth of just 3.5%, higher education’s digital investments are the lowest among industries surveyed. While just 5.6% of higher-ed respondents’ revenues are derived through digital channels today, that figure is expected to nearly double by 2023, to 10.6%.

Future Learning Experiences

Going forward students will learn differently. In a digital-first world, they will expect content that responds to them. Students will require learning experiences that are easy to access and be highly compelling, even bingeworthy, drawing students from one module to the next like the latest television show on a streaming service.

In a hyperconnected world, rote classroom activities will give way to a fusion of lesson plans with pick-and-choose, video game-like distance learning options (or motion-activated learning while on the move, with an audio lecture or podcast and no screens or devices at all).

Technology should be used to “nudge” or check in with students, whether through chatbots, texting, conversational AI or other mechanisms, using analytics and machine learning algorithms to detect when such engagement would be most effective, to make student communications easier, constructive and persistent.

Like musicians or filmmakers, we might see teachers and professors begin to franchise or license lessons with on-demand revenue allocation. The rise of offerings like Master Class — a fee-based streaming platform that offers stepwise lessons from the world’s virtuoso storytellers, chefs, filmmakers, etc. — provides an idea of how this might work.

Listen to Previous Episodes of EdTech Today!

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @MarketScale

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Education Technology starts with a company putting its implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Procurement teams read long before they ever call, and your implementers get to answer their questions first.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Education Technology, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Education Technology: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Education Technology buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Education Technology expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your implementation leads, instructional designers, and district partners into the articles, video, and social content Education Technology buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Education Technology Insights

EdTech deals rose 11% while the median funding round shrank 31%

EdTech deals rose 11% while the median funding round shrank 31%

EdTech deals rose 11% over the past year, while the median round shrank 31% and Series A rounds got scarcer. First financings nearly doubled. District and corporate learning buyers now face more seed-funded vendors, just as procurement asks for proof that students use the product and learn from it.

  • 01EdTech now has 37 first financings where it had 19, and a thinner Series A pipeline behind them: more products are starting, and fewer are getting the money to grow up.
  • 02For buyers, a vendor’s funding stage is now a due-diligence input alongside the evidence file: a seed-funded tool may be strong, but still lack the capital to deliver the integrations, implementation and ongoing support that larger deployments require.
  • 03In a two-year trial in 18 Tennessee middle schools, 96% of students tried the Khanmigo AI tutor, yet the median student messaged it on only a third of practice days. Usage logs are a sharper test of AI tutoring than access counts.

Nov 14, 2026

AI training and clear policies went with teacher confidence but not cheating worries, CWU survey finds

AI training and clear policies went with teacher confidence but not cheating worries, CWU survey finds

A Central Washington University survey of 222 high school math and English teachers found clear AI policies and useful training went with higher teacher confidence. Neither showed a link to morale or cheating worries. Districts should judge AI training by confidence and classroom practice, and handle integrity through assignment and tool design.

  • 01In this survey, clear AI policy and useful training went with higher teacher confidence and had no measurable link to morale or cheating worries. To address integrity concerns, the authors suggest focusing on how assignments and assessments are designed, alongside discipline-specific guidance.
  • 02English teachers reported the most integrity worry (83.7%) and also the most confidence teaching responsible AI use (45.5%). Subject may shape AI attitudes more than readiness does, which makes one AI course for every department a weak plan.

Nov 14, 2026

Kazakhstan’s Coursera award: 163,098 recognized university credits

Kazakhstan’s Coursera award: 163,098 recognized university credits

Kazakhstan's Ministry of Science and Higher Education won Coursera's Learning Excellence Award 2026 for building online courses into university programs. Since 2022, Kazakh universities have recognized 163,098 academic credits from Coursera coursework. Credits show what institutions accepted, not just what was bought.

  • 01Kazakh universities have recognized 163,098 academic credits for Coursera coursework since 2022, a harder-to-get benchmark of online learning being accepted into formal academic records.
  • 02A license count shows what was bought; a credit count shows what universities accepted onto a student record. Recognized credits capture a harder step than seats, hours or certificates.
  • 03The Kazakh model transfers most directly where the buyer of seats and the body that grants credit are closely tied; corporate learning teams need their own equivalent of a recognized credit, such as a role requirement or a training record.

Nov 13, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Education Technology and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512