Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to Industries

Education Technology

What Defines a Next-Gen High School?

A seismic shift is occurring in the traditional education set to create a growing trend for the next-gen high school. Schools worldwide are exploring innovative educational frameworks designed to cater to the needs of the next generation, focusing on real-world applicability, technology, and personalized learning. The stakes are high, with the American education system grappling…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Education Technology teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Promoted content from The Future of Education with Michael Horn on MarketScale.

Share

A seismic shift is occurring in the traditional education set to create a growing trend for the next-gen high school. Schools worldwide are exploring innovative educational frameworks designed to cater to the needs of the next generation, focusing on real-world applicability, technology, and personalized learning. The stakes are high, with the American education system grappling with the challenge of maintaining equitable and effective learning amidst these changes. America’s hi-tech sector is ready for the next generation of skilled workers to take command. Only problem? There aren’t enough skilled workers to fill the roles. The need for education reinvention is clear.

Amidst these changes, a core question arises: “What defines an innovative or Next-Gen high school, and how are these schools shaping the future of education?”

In the latest episode of The Future of Education, hosted by Michael B. Horn, three influential guests from the field of education tackle this question. Ken Montgomery, co-founder and executive director at Design Tech High, Keeanna Warren, Assistant Executive Director at Purdue Polytechnic High School Network, and Shadman Uddin, a master’s Student in Education at Stanford Graduate School of Education, discuss the implementation of ongoing innovations and strategies in NextGen high schools.

The main points of their conversation revolve around the following:

  • The concept and definition of NextGen or innovative schools
  • The real-world outcomes of NextGen education models
  • The role of technology and partnerships in driving innovation in high school education

Ken Montgomery co-founded Design Tech High, known as D-Tech, and has successfully established it as a model for innovative education. Before this, he held various roles in educational leadership and has a proven track record of improving student outcomes by strategically implementing personalized learning models.

Keeanna Warren, Ph.D., as the Assistant Executive Director at Purdue Polytechnic High School Network, has played a significant role in aligning academic objectives with innovative, industry-driven strategies. She has also worked on various educational initiatives designed to increase accessibility and equity in education.

Shadman Uddin, a master’s Student in Education at Stanford Graduate School of Education, brings a fresh perspective to the conversation. Shaman’s recent research into NextGen school models sparked the discussion, challenging the traditional definitions of innovative schools and proposing an outcomes-oriented framework for defining NextGen education.

The Future of Education’s latest episode serves as a thought-provoking exploration of how high schools are innovating to meet the needs of future generations. As schools evolve, the insights and experiences shared by Montgomery, Warren, and Uddin provide valuable context for educators, policymakers, and students navigating these changes.

The Future of Education with Michael Horn

Part of this channel

The Future of Education with Michael Horn

Michael Horn interviews the people redesigning how students learn

Visit the channel →

New to MarketScale?

MarketScale is the platform Education Technology companies use to turn their own experts into content like this. Want the short overview?

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Education Technology Insights

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

How Raptor's StudentSafe tackles behavioral threat assessment and student well-being

Raptor Technologies has transitioned from visitor management to enhancing student well-being with its StudentSafe platform. This move addresses school district needs for improved behavioral threat assessment. StudentSafe is designed to bolster educational security and student safety.

  • 01Raptor Technologies is expanding into student well-being.
  • 02The StudentSafe platform focuses on behavioral threat assessment.
  • 03StudentSafe responds to demands from school district customers.

Jun 26, 2026

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

New York City schools have mandated that every AI tool undergo a bias and equity review before being deployed within their systems. This move comes amid broader concerns and debates about the role of AI in education, particularly concerning its impact on cognitive development. The education sector is actively assessing the potential benefits and risks associated with AI technologies in classrooms.

  • 01NYC schools require AI tools to pass a bias and equity review.
  • 02Concerns about AI in education include impacts on cognitive development.
  • 03Policymakers are reconsidering the place of AI in classrooms.

Jun 17, 2026

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

NYC schools require every AI tool to pass a bias and equity review before deployment

Twenty-nine New York City council members are demanding a two-year halt to AI use in the nation's largest school system, citing student data privacy gaps. Simultaneously, California and other states are tightening AI bias-audit requirements for employers, while educators debate a deeper question: whether AI adopted without guardrails erodes the original human thinking it is meant to support.

  • 01Twenty-nine NYC council members sent a letter on June 9, 2026, calling for a two-year AI moratorium in city schools, citing inadequate student data privacy protections in the Department of Education's drafted guidance.
  • 02California's Civil Rights Council AI regulations, effective Oct. 1, 2025, require employers using automated decision systems to retain related data for four years and face heightened litigation risk if they skip bias audits.
  • 03Educators and practitioners are wrestling with a fundamental design question: whether AI functions as a 'calculator'—executing tasks users already understand—or a 'crane' that extends human capacity into genuinely new territory.

Jun 17, 2026

Explore More Education Technology Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Education Technology.

Browse Education Technology Hub