Why Training Design Should Start with the Final Assessment: Quicksilver

 

Too often the design of training focuses first on content, then on how it is delivered, and finally on how it is assessed. The Backwards Design module, introduced by Wiggins and McTighe flips this approach so that the design of instruction starts with the design of the assessment. So, why should training design start with the final assessment?

On today’s episode of Quicksilver: A Behind the Scenes Look at The eLearning Alchemist Podcast, host Clint Clarkson  and guest Sam Rogers discuss the significant value of designing training assessments before the training content. Sam is an experienced L&D professional with several years of evolution as an instructional media specialist. As his career expanded, he realized that the creation of content was often done prematurely and that instructional designers often lacked the information they needed to solve business problems through training.

Sam says that “If you’re not clear [at the start of the project] on what your deliverable is and how the business will assess what you’ve done [you’ve hampered yourself, because] that’s not really something you can bolt on at the end.”

This observation is crucial given statistics released by The Association for Talent Development’s (ATD) in their research report Evaluation Effectiveness: Measuring Learning Programs for Success. In this study, ATD found that only 38 percent of organizations evaluate training programs based on business results.

The study also revealed that only 40 percent of the 779 learning professionals who participated in the study believed that their efforts were effective in meeting business goals. It’s a startling confession and one that desperately needs to be addressed. “You will be judged [and] you’re going to be judged on the metric [the business] is looking at,” Sam said. Learning professionals can’t simply look at their own metrics, they need to look at the metrics of the business. Clearly, there’s work to be done.

Beginning with the assessment is not intuitive, but it’s the better approach to instructional design. It allows the designer to narrow the project scope and ensure the training is properly aligned to resolve the business problem. Learning professionals and business leaders alike should be challenging each other to build better assessments at the start of a learning project.

Listen to previous episodes of The eLearning Alchemist!

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Image

Latest

personal branding
Personal Branding Now Drives B2B Success, Customer Trust, and Competitive Advantage
December 5, 2025

Personal branding has rapidly shifted from a “nice-to-have” to a strategic imperative in B2B marketing, reshaping how companies communicate, differentiate, and build trust. As industries evolve and professionals take on more dynamic, multi-stream careers, visibility and authenticity have become critical assets. Key findings from the Edelman + LinkedIn Thought Leadership Impact Report show that…

Read More
IT
Real-World IT Practices Are Streamlining AV Deployments and Raising the Bar for Consistency
December 4, 2025

For years, the AV industry has discussed the long-anticipated convergence with IT—but that shift is no longer theoretical. With cloud adoption accelerating, hybrid work normalizing, and organizations rebuilding digital infrastructure after years of rapid change, AV systems now sit squarely on the IT backbone. In fact, the majority of newly upgraded conference rooms require network-centric…

Read More
ROI
ROI Case Study
December 3, 2025

Denials are no longer a slow leak in the revenue cycle—they’re a fast-moving, rule-shifting game controlled by payers, and hospitals that don’t model denial patterns in real time end up budgeting around losses they could have prevented. PayerWatch’s four-digit, client-verified ROI in 2024 shows what happens when a hospital stops reacting claim by…

Read More
coverage
Clip 2 – Fighting for Coverage: One Patient’s Story
December 3, 2025

Health insurers love to advertise themselves as guardians of care, but the real story often begins when a patient’s life no longer fits neatly into a spreadsheet. In oncology especially, “coverage” isn’t a bureaucratic checkbox—it’s the fragile bridge between a treatment that finally works and a relapse that can undo years of grit…

Read More