Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesEnergy

Energy Companies Need to Understand Their Cyber Attack Surface To Protect Against Cybersecurity Threats

Cyber threats targeting energy companies are on the rise, and the recent alleged attack on a Canadian natural gas company by Russian-based hacking group Zarya had many in the industry on edge. Although the group claims to have caused financial damage without loss of life, the potential for devastating outcomes in future attacks is…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Energy teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Energy expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Cyber threats targeting energy companies are on the rise, and the recent alleged attack on a Canadian natural gas company by Russian-based hacking group Zarya had many in the industry on edge. Although the group claims to have caused financial damage without loss of life, the potential for devastating outcomes in future attacks is a growing concern. What steps can energy companies take to fortify their defenses, understand their cyber attack surface and ensure the security of critical infrastructure and sensitive data?

In light of this alarming trend, it’s clear that energy companies must prioritize cybersecurity, investing in advanced technology and employee training to combat these threats. Cooperation between the private sector, government agencies, and security experts will be crucial for staying informed about potential risks and developing strategies to mitigate them. Regular software updates and stringent security protocols can also lessen the chances of a successful cyberattack. The pressing question remains: Are energy companies doing enough to protect themselves from cyber threats?

With a keen understanding of the multifaceted threats to the energy sector, Megan Samford, VP and Chief Product Security Officer of Energy Management at Schneider Electric, emphasizes the importance of comprehensively assessing one’s cyber attack surface and staying prepared for potential incidents.

Megan’s Thoughts:

“So when it comes to threats to the energy sector, we can really look at it from a few different angles. The first is aging infrastructure. The second is traditional natural disasters that happen every single day that the grid is used to dealing with and has been used to dealing with for over a hundred years now.

The next is the increased connectivity to the grid. We know that this means increased digitization and electrification, which is great. But increased connectivity also brings an increased attack surface. And finally, we see very targeted attacks to the energy sector as well as more opportunistic attacks like ransomware.

The targeted attacks are getting scarier; we see repeatable attack frameworks that are being used more like Swiss Army knives rather than one-in-done style malware that wasn’t able to be used across companies, across products or different sectors. And finally, what can be done about this?

The first thing is to understand your attack surface and the connections coming in and out of your network. Have an up-to-date asset inventory. On top of that, you want to have a defensible network architecture. You want to have anomaly detection so that you’re able to detect when the bad guys do get onto your network.

And finally, you want to have an incident response plan with the stakeholders that are in your supply chain that you can reach out to, to support you, as well as government contacts from CISA and the FBI that can be called upon.”

Article written by Azam Saghir.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Energy starts with a company putting its field engineers, operations leads, and project developers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Developers and operators shortlist on credibility, and your engineers give your sales team something real to send.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Energy, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Energy: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Energy buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Energy expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your field engineers, operations leads, and project developers into the articles, video, and social content Energy buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Energy Insights

Calibrant closes $145M debt facility for solar and storage

Calibrant closes $145M debt facility for solar and storage

Calibrant Energy closed a $145 million Investec-led debt facility for solar and storage projects across U.S. power markets. It includes a 120MWh battery for a hyperscale data center in PJM, designed to give the site more control over how and when it pulls power from the grid.

  • 01Calibrant says storage that gives a data center more control over its grid draw supports faster interconnection. Investec, Citi, Liberty Bank and Siemens Financial Services financed a solar and storage portfolio that includes one such battery.
  • 02The Aligned Data Centers battery in the Pacific Northwest is the reference case: the building was finished, and the wait for utility power was tied to peak-hour load constraints.
  • 03Watch whether Calibrant’s additional battery sites for the same hyperscale customer move from development into construction; repeat builds could signal the approach is moving beyond one-off projects.

Nov 11, 2026

rPlus Energies lands $450 million credit line backed by its operating solar plants

rPlus Energies lands $450 million credit line backed by its operating solar plants

rPlus Energies closed a three-year revolving credit facility of up to $450 million, backed by cash flows from nearly 1GW of operating assets, including the Green River Energy Center in Utah and Pleasant Valley Solar 2 in Idaho. Plants that reached full commercial operation on July 21 were, by early November, part of the security behind the facility—showing how operating projects can quickly support financing for near-term solar and storage builds across the American West.

  • 01Plants that reached full commercial operation on July 21 were, by early November, part of the security behind up to $450 million for rPlus Energies' next round of building.
  • 02The revolver is sized for a pipeline, not a single megaproject: Green River in Utah alone took more than $1 billion of construction debt, so a $450 million facility with letters of credit looks more like working capital and credit support than a substitute for project loans.
  • 03For utilities and data center buyers contracting in Utah and Idaho, a counterparty's company-level facility backed by operating cash flow is a concrete thing to ask about before signing, alongside how long it runs.

Nov 11, 2026

Planning, permits and interconnection carry $266 billion of Brattle's $614 billion DER estimate

Planning, permits and interconnection carry $266 billion of Brattle's $614 billion DER estimate

A Brattle Group report prepared for Pew estimates distributed energy resources, including customer batteries and flexible load, could avoid $614 billion in US power system costs through 2050. Three process reforms from Pew's DER policy playbook account for $266 billion. For utilities, the most practical finding is a roughly 40% cut in overbuild costs if forecast demand falls short.

  • 01Incorporating distributed resources into distribution system planning, reducing permitting costs and reforming interconnection account for $266 billion of the $614 billion in avoided power system costs through 2050, a little over two-fifths of the total.
  • 02If forecast load growth falls short, leaning on distributed resources cuts the cost of overbuilt grid infrastructure by $33 billion between 2030 and 2040, about 40%, which makes DERs a hedge against uncertain data center demand.
  • 03The near-term test sits in PJM, where Google and Voltus agreed to aggregate up to 100 MW of distributed resources per year for three years into a Google-funded virtual power plant.

Nov 10, 2026

Explore More Energy Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Energy.

Browse Energy Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Energy and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512