Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesFood & Beverage

The Last Of The Steam Breweries

The upcoming MarketScale ‘American Craft’ series is showcasing some of the nation’s top craft breweries to discover how they disrupted a market long dominated by international conglomerates. Our first multi-media installment takes a look at Anchor Brewing in San Francisco, Calif. Craft brewing in America is usually associated with the 21st century. New breweries open…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Food & Beverage teams put it to work with Customer Stories & Case Studies.

Share

The upcoming MarketScale ‘American Craft’ series is showcasing some of the nation’s top craft breweries to discover how they disrupted a market long dominated by international conglomerates. Our first multi-media installment takes a look at Anchor Brewing in San Francisco, Calif.

Craft brewing in America is usually associated with the 21st century. New breweries open every year and have given the industry a feeling of newness. However, the first beer pioneers started in 1896.

At the height of Gold Rush in San Francisco, what would become known as the Big Four Investors, Leland Stanford, Collis P Huntington, Mark Hopkins, and Charles Crocker started to build the market to support the influx of settlers trying to prosper in the American west. The future tycoons built rail roads and beer quickly followed.

“The brewers knew there would be a thirsty city and started brewing beer,” Anchor Brewing Brewmaster Scott Ungermann said.

The immigrants who followed the economic and industrial boom of California were by-and-large Germans that brought lager yeast. With refrigeration technology not yet available, early brewers needed a way to cool their wort rapidly and consistently. One of the ways they improvised was by rethinking the fermentation process. Instead of closed vertical containers, they designed big, shallow open coolships on top of rooftops, which let the ocean breeze do the work of cooling the beer. This process created an immense amount of steam which prompted the nickname, Steam Beer.

https://marketscale.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Achor-2.webp

https://marketscale.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Anchor.webp

https://marketscale.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Anchor-3.webp

https://marketscale.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Anchor-4.webp

https://marketscale.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Anchor-5.webp

https://marketscale.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Anchor-6.webp

https://marketscale.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Anchor-7.webp

https://marketscale.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Anchor-8.webp

https://marketscale.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Anchor-9.webp

https://marketscale.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Anchor-10.webp

https://marketscale.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Anchor-Ferment.webp

At the turn of the 20th century, there were dozens of breweries in the Bay Area using this method to create beer. Prohibition naturally hindered the craft brewing industry even after its repeal. Ungermann says there are no records of Anchor producing any beer during the 14 years in which prohibition was in effect. Only seven local breweries survived the legislation that banned the sale of alcohol in the 1920s and early 1930s.

By 1965, Anchor Brewing was the last Steam Beer brewery on the West Coast, but Anchor was far from thriving. Anchor had briefly closed its doors in 1959 and was looking at another death.

“[The brewery was] down to 3 accounts in the city and only had double digits in the bank account,” Ungermann said.

The brewery had plans to close when across town at the Spaghetti Factory, Fritz Maytag (yes, that Maytag), was told by the bartender that he, “had been served his last Anchor Steam ever.”

Determined to save the brewery, Maytag went to Anchor the very next day to purchase the fledgling beer provider.

Throughout the 1950s and sixties, Anchor Brewing had built up an unfortunate reputation for being an inconsistent beer. Due to the lack of proper ownership, the brewery had fallen into bad habits of not cleaning its equipment thoroughly and not following proper procedure in the brewing process.

In response to this, Maytag put the beer under the microscope, literally.

“He very famously bought a microscope [he needed in order to] figure out what was going on with his beer, how was it fermenting,” Ungermann said.

“He got the beer right, that’s what he focused on first. He figured out the process and how to develop more consistency with the flavor of the beer and then he went out and sold the beer,” Ungermann said.

Maytag did not look to build out an extensive national network but instead wanted to build a larger, more loyal base in San Francisco and his improved product resonated. Anchor Steam started to garner a cult following as something different than what was dominating the market: light, “golden fizzy lagers” from the larger producers.

 “[Anchor Steam was] inherently different, it was still a lager but a more carameled color, a bit hoppier, a little more bitter, a little sweetness, a little bigger, all malt,” Ungermann said.

On MarketScale’s American Craft podcast, take a step into Anchor Brewing’s fermentation room and learn how a company twice on its deathbed has become among the largest and most profitable craft breweries in the world.

For the latest news, videos, and podcasts in the Food & Beverage Industry, be sure to subscribe to our industry publication.

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @FoodMKSL

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Food & Beverage: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Food & Beverage buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one expert. Imagine publishing your whole team.

This article was produced through MarketScale. Create a free workspace and turn your own team's expertise into articles, video, and social posts. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Food & Beverage Insights

FDA slows synthetic-dye phase-out as 160 food and ag groups press for USMCA renewal

FDA slows synthetic-dye phase-out as 160 food and ag groups press for USMCA renewal

The FDA has revised its timeline for phasing out petroleum-based synthetic food dyes, slowing a process it announced in April 2025 with a target end date of 2027. Separately, nearly 160 food and agriculture organizations have signed a coordinated letter urging USMCA renewal before the agreement's July 1 review deadline. Additional regulatory fronts — including a California ultra-processed food labeling bill, a bipartisan FDA import-destruction measure, and a USDA domestic fertilizer push — are compounding compliance demands across the food and agriculture sector.

  • 01FDA has revised its synthetic dye phase-out schedule, slowing a voluntary removal program originally targeting six petroleum-based color additives by end of 2027.
  • 02Nearly 160 food and agriculture groups have urged USMCA renewal before the July 1 joint review deadline, warning that inaction could disrupt cross-border supply chains.
  • 03California's AB 2244 and a bipartisan federal bill targeting unsafe food imports are adding new compliance layers for food manufacturers and retailers.

Jun 17, 2026

FDA slows synthetic-dye phase-out as 160 food and ag groups push to renew USMCA

FDA slows synthetic-dye phase-out as 160 food and ag groups push to renew USMCA

The FDA's April 2025 voluntary initiative to phase out petroleum-based synthetic dyes from the U.S. food supply has generated a wave of corporate commitments, with major brands targeting 2026–2027 deadlines. However, Consumer Reports found that many large food companies have yet to pledge any changes, even where natural alternatives are already used abroad. Meanwhile, broader regulatory shifts — including a USDA reorganization affecting food assistance programs and new legislative proposals on food labeling and import safety — are reshaping the operating environment for food and beverage manufacturers.

  • 01The FDA is working with industry to eliminate six certified petroleum-based color additives from the U.S. food supply by the end of 2027, after revoking authorization for Red No. 3 earlier in 2025.
  • 02A March 2026 Consumer Reports survey found 72 percent of U.S. adults are at least somewhat concerned about synthetic dyes, and 66 percent say companies should be required to phase them out — yet many major brands have made no commitments.
  • 03Separate regulatory pressures are mounting: California advanced a non-ultra-processed food labeling bill, Congress moved bipartisan legislation to let the FDA destroy unsafe food imports, and the USDA reorganized its food nutrition administration amid leadership changes.

Jun 17, 2026

The Produce Distribution Industry Needs Flexibility, Empathy, and a New Generation of Talent

The Produce Distribution Industry Needs Flexibility, Empathy, and a New Generation of Talent

Produce distributors are facing tightening margins and supply chain pressures that demand more flexible operations and empathetic leadership. AJ Krow argues that attracting and retaining a new generation of talent is critical to the industry's long-term survival. Modernizing workplace culture and rethinking traditional distribution practices are central to meeting these challenges.

  • 01Produce distributors must adapt operations to withstand tightening margins and supply chain volatility.
  • 02Empathetic leadership and flexible workplace culture are essential to attracting younger talent to the industry.
  • 03A generational shift in the workforce requires the produce distribution sector to rethink recruiting and retention strategies.

May 1, 2025

Explore More Food & Beverage Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Food & Beverage.

Browse Food & Beverage Hub