Department-Specific Reviews can Streamline Material Review Workflows Leading to Faster Approvals

 

Organizations are increasingly seeking ways to streamline internal processes while ensuring compliance and maintaining high standards. One approach gaining traction is department-specific reviews or role-specific reviews. This method assigns review responsibilities to specific departments or roles, rather than having every piece of content reviewed by all departments. This strategy not only clarifies responsibilities but also ensures that only the necessary reviewers are involved in each step, optimizing efficiency and regulatory adherence.

How can organizations effectively implement department-specific reviews, and what factors should be considered to determine their appropriateness?

This question is at the heart of the latest episode of “Amend & Progress by Vodori,” hosted by Annalise Ludtke and featuring Anne Swearingen, CEO of 6 Tangerines Consulting. Swearingen shares her thoughts on how organizations can streamline their review processes by implementing role-specific reviews, drawing from her extensive experience in optimizing workflow efficiencies.

Episode Highlights

  • Definition and Contextualization: Department or role-specific reviews involve assigning specific review responsibilities to certain departments or roles, rather than having every piece of content reviewed by all departments. This helps clarify who is responsible for what and ensures that only the necessary reviewers are involved in each step.
  • Risk-Based Approach: Organizations must assess the risk associated with different types of content to determine when department-specific reviews are appropriate. High-risk content, such as marketing materials with medical claims, might require comprehensive reviews, while lower-risk items, like conference invites, could be handled by a single department.
  • Benefits and Considerations: The primary benefit is increased speed, as fewer reviewers can mean faster approvals. Other benefits include reduced workload for reviewers and the ability to tailor the review process to fit the specific needs of different types of content. Organizations must consider their regulatory environment, resource availability, and internal processes when deciding how to implement these reviews.

Anne Swearingen, CEO of 6 Tangerines Consulting, brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to the discussion. With a strong background in regulatory affairs and consulting, Anne has helped numerous organizations optimize their review processes and navigate complex regulatory landscapes. Her expertise makes her a valuable voice in this conversation, offering practical advice and strategic insights.

Recent Episodes

Healthcare access
View episode

Healthcare costs are rising steadily, while insurance benefits struggle to offer sufficient coverage, driving demand for practical solutions like nontraditional benefits and discount plans. As premiums rise and coverage limits remain stagnant, many individuals and employers seek alternative ways to manage costs and improve healthcare access. With chronic conditions on the rise, the stakes…

rule
View episode

The 2025 Home Health Final Rule introduces a range of regulatory updates to improve transparency, elevate patient care standards, and stabilize financial practices within the home health sector. With these updates taking effect, home health agencies must adapt quickly, especially as CMS focuses on value-based care and Social Determinants of Health (SDOH). According to…

View episode

The significance of excellent customer service in every corner and industry cannot be overstated. This notion is especially crucial in healthcare, where patient experiences often influence their recovery and overall well-being. The topic of customer service in the medical field is always a priority in healthcare because providers strive to enhance patient satisfaction and…