Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Encouraging the Adoption of Value-Based Care

How are Precision Health Insight Networks (PHINs) laying the groundwork for mainstream adoption of precision health? While recognized for its promise to save millions of lives and billions of dollars, the advancement of precision medicine has been limited to only a handful of conditions due to data silos and disconnected databases. The power of PHINs…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

How are Precision Health Insight Networks (PHINs) laying the groundwork for mainstream adoption of precision health? While recognized for its promise to save millions of lives and billions of dollars, the advancement of precision medicine has been limited to only a handful of conditions due to data silos and disconnected databases.

The power of PHINs was on full display during COVID-19. Now, these award-winning solutions are poised to drive innovations across many disease states.

Brad Bostic, CEO of HC1, had this to say about the topic.

“So, I’ve been often asked the question about personalized medicine and the practical nature of that, and, ultimately, will it ever be mainstream?

My point of view on that is absolutely it will be. What I see happening right now within health care is this Renaissance that gives us a chance at getting there sooner rather than later.

The first part of that being the incentive models in healthcare, where, historically, we’ve been focused on a fee-for-service model. That incentivizes volume, and it doesn’t really allow for the idea of anything being personalized.

In fact, I’d say it’s quite the opposite. If you’re volume-motivated, you’re looking at it more like widgets. How do I do as much as I can, as fast as I can? And it’s not intended to deliver a bad outcome to patients, but there’s just not the right incentive there.

What we have emerging now is more of a value-based model.

We now know enough about how much it should cost to take care of different conditions. And, if you implement best practices to take care of those conditions and you effectively manage those patients, you can have a budget like a bucket of money per person in a given disease state or a given demographic within a population to care for them.

If you can do it in a way that costs less than what you were allocated, you can make more profit, so that’s creating an incentive. That’s clearing the way for programs that healthcare leaders are interested in investing in — precision healthcare types of models. A specific example of that would be the ability to truly identify those people in your population that are taking medications that aren’t working for them and doing that by looking at a combination of that person’s diagnosis, that person’s medication list, and that person’s specific genomic profile.

It’s something that I believe will become extremely widespread in the coming months and years. In fact, I once had the head of the health plan for one of the largest technology companies on earth say to me, in the next five years, it will be considered criminal negligence to not perform these precision prescribing kinds of tests like pharmacogenetics, and that was a very extreme statement.

But his point was, if we know we have a test that’s relatively low cost, that can determine what medication is going to work for you and prevent you from having a heart stent or potentially some kind of catastrophic cardiac arrest event. why would we allow that not to happen? Why would we not run that test to make sure that we’re getting you on the optimal medication? And that’s just one small example.

I think ultimately, though, what we’ll find is the kind of experience that we’ve grown to appreciate and expect from consumer services.”

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @MarketScale

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Healthcare Insights

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Wolters Kluwer Health argues value-based care software is judged on whether customers hit incentive thresholds and avoid penalties. A Fierce Healthcare-reported survey it cites puts value-based care at a quarter or more of revenue for 30% of organizations. The analysis is a vendor publication that ends by pitching its own UpToDate Connect API.

  • 01The sharper question for any population health or care coordination platform is whether it changes what a clinician does at the moment of decision, or only reports afterward what happened. Wolters Kluwer's reading of the evidence is that many platforms still struggle with the first.
  • 02Vendors selling into value-based contracts now face a build-or-license decision on clinical content, because Wolters Kluwer names current, trusted content, consistent clinician adoption across sites, and a traceable link from guidance to quality metrics as the three hard problems.

Sep 18, 2026

Hospitals lost money on telehealth with every payer type in 2025

Strata Decision Technology's Performance Trends report found telehealth encounters at U.S. hospitals rose 79% from January 2019 to January 2026, yet average total cost margins were negative for commercial, Medicare, Medicaid and self-pay patients in 2025. Adoption has outrun reimbursement. The gap lands on health systems that posted a 0.2% operating margin in April, according to Strata.

  • 01A negative total cost margin on telehealth across all four payer categories is now a national benchmark from a dataset covering more than 2,200 hospitals; a health system's own per-encounter virtual care margin can be measured against it.
  • 02Remote patient monitoring encounters grew nearly 4,000% since 2019 while reimbursement for the service is still maturing, so an RPM business case built on volume alone will miss the number that actually decides its viability.
  • 03The signal to watch is whether any single payer category shows a positive telehealth margin in Strata's next Performance Trends cut. As of the 2025 data, none did.

Sep 18, 2026

Most reprocessing audit gaps trace back to training, turnover and leadership

Most reprocessing audit gaps trace back to training, turnover and leadership

Joint Commission findings on its reprocessing standard point mostly to training, turnover, leadership and missing ownership, not sterilizers. CDC epidemiologists and a 2019 review add cleaning verification and manufacturer instructions as the steps to watch. Audit people and process steps as closely as the autoclave.

  • 01Of the Joint Commission's list of reasons hospitals miss reprocessing standard IC.02.02.01, at least eight concern people, priorities and management, so competency records and a named process owner belong in the audit as much as sterilizer logs.
  • 02A structured audit tool that scores compliance step by step, as a 2020 BMC Health Services Research study did across 189 reprocessing cycles, shows where training hours should go; the Nepal hospitals scored best on cleaning and storage and worse on the steps between.

Sep 14, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512