Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Encouraging the Adoption of Value-Based Care

How are Precision Health Insight Networks (PHINs) laying the groundwork for mainstream adoption of precision health? While recognized for its promise to save millions of lives and billions of dollars, the advancement of precision medicine has been limited to only a handful of conditions due to data silos and disconnected databases. The power of PHINs…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Request an invite

How are Precision Health Insight Networks (PHINs) laying the groundwork for mainstream adoption of precision health? While recognized for its promise to save millions of lives and billions of dollars, the advancement of precision medicine has been limited to only a handful of conditions due to data silos and disconnected databases.

The power of PHINs was on full display during COVID-19. Now, these award-winning solutions are poised to drive innovations across many disease states.

Brad Bostic, CEO of HC1, had this to say about the topic.

“So, I’ve been often asked the question about personalized medicine and the practical nature of that, and, ultimately, will it ever be mainstream?

My point of view on that is absolutely it will be. What I see happening right now within health care is this Renaissance that gives us a chance at getting there sooner rather than later.

The first part of that being the incentive models in healthcare, where, historically, we’ve been focused on a fee-for-service model. That incentivizes volume, and it doesn’t really allow for the idea of anything being personalized.

In fact, I’d say it’s quite the opposite. If you’re volume-motivated, you’re looking at it more like widgets. How do I do as much as I can, as fast as I can? And it’s not intended to deliver a bad outcome to patients, but there’s just not the right incentive there.

What we have emerging now is more of a value-based model.

We now know enough about how much it should cost to take care of different conditions. And, if you implement best practices to take care of those conditions and you effectively manage those patients, you can have a budget like a bucket of money per person in a given disease state or a given demographic within a population to care for them.

If you can do it in a way that costs less than what you were allocated, you can make more profit, so that’s creating an incentive. That’s clearing the way for programs that healthcare leaders are interested in investing in — precision healthcare types of models. A specific example of that would be the ability to truly identify those people in your population that are taking medications that aren’t working for them and doing that by looking at a combination of that person’s diagnosis, that person’s medication list, and that person’s specific genomic profile.

It’s something that I believe will become extremely widespread in the coming months and years. In fact, I once had the head of the health plan for one of the largest technology companies on earth say to me, in the next five years, it will be considered criminal negligence to not perform these precision prescribing kinds of tests like pharmacogenetics, and that was a very extreme statement.

But his point was, if we know we have a test that’s relatively low cost, that can determine what medication is going to work for you and prevent you from having a heart stent or potentially some kind of catastrophic cardiac arrest event. why would we allow that not to happen? Why would we not run that test to make sure that we’re getting you on the optimal medication? And that’s just one small example.

I think ultimately, though, what we’ll find is the kind of experience that we’ve grown to appreciate and expect from consumer services.”

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @MarketScale

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. See how AI describes your company today, and where competitors show up instead.

Free workspace

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale Studio workspace
One video edit a month, on us
AI writing, editing, and publishing tools
In-platform coaching to learn the system

More Healthcare Insights

Interchangeable biosimilars are getting approved faster, and Wezlana shows why

Interchangeable biosimilars are getting approved faster, and Wezlana shows why

The FDA approved Wezlana (ustekinumab-auub) as a biosimilar to and interchangeable with Stelara for multiple inflammatory diseases, which means it may be substituted without consulting the prescriber, subject to state pharmacy laws. A Springer analysis reported 26 interchangeable biosimilars approved since 2020 and said average approval timelines decreased from 798 days for applications dated in 2020 to 364 days for applications dated in 2024. The operational pressure shifts to formulary, payer, and specialty pharmacy workflow design.

  • 01Interchangeability is becoming the default ask, not an afterthought: Springer found 17 of 26 approvals pursued interchangeability concurrently, which changes how buyers should time contracting and conversions.
  • 02Springer reported average approval timelines decreased from 798 days for applications dated in 2020 to 364 days for applications dated in 2024, which can compress planning windows for monitoring and implementation.
  • 03A new interchangeable ustekinumab option means the hard work is no longer clinical, it is operational: NDC mapping, EMR preference lists, substitution rules by state, and patient communications decide whether savings show up.

Sep 8, 2026

AAO-HNSF hearing loss guideline moves audiograms and amplification into primary care

AAO-HNSF’s new age-related hearing loss guideline calls for screening adults starting at age 50 and escalating to otoscopy, audiogram, and appropriately fit amplification. It shifts hearing loss from “patient complaint” to a routine primary-care workflow. The pressure shows up in audiology capacity, referral design, and documentation standards.

  • 01Screening at age 50 becomes a repeatable workflow, so capacity planning shifts from episodic ENT referrals to steady primary-care volume, especially where annual wellness visits are a dominant access point.
  • 02The guideline’s escalation sequence, screen, otoscopy, audiogram, amplification, then cochlear implant candidacy evaluation, creates a measurable funnel that health systems can instrument in the EHR and manage like any other pathway.
  • 03Asymmetric loss remains a separate trigger for MRI in many settings, and 2026 pre-proof work using NHANES and SEER highlights why imaging criteria choices can swing scan volume, a budgeting and radiology access issue, not a clinical footnote.

Sep 7, 2026

ADHA shifts My Health Record to multi-supplier ops as Accenture signs new 3-year contract

ADHA shifts My Health Record to multi-supplier ops as Accenture signs new 3-year contract

Accenture will keep supporting Australia’s My Health Record under a new three-year contract. ADHA is moving the platform to a multi-supplier operating model. The shift raises questions about shared integration discipline, tooling, and accountability when changes hit production.

  • 01Multi-supplier delivery is spreading across national-scale health platforms, as ADHA's My Health Record shift shows, moving risk from vendor selection to integration, runbooks, and accountability.
  • 02GenAI model upgrades are arriving with healthcare-specific claims, but the procurement work moves to evidence, safety controls, and monitoring once models sit inside clinical workflows.
  • 03Embedded AI expands the cyber asset inventory problem: if teams cannot discover the AI components across endpoints and devices, they cannot reliably secure or audit them.

Sep 7, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512