Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Encouraging the Adoption of Value-Based Care

How are Precision Health Insight Networks (PHINs) laying the groundwork for mainstream adoption of precision health? While recognized for its promise to save millions of lives and billions of dollars, the advancement of precision medicine has been limited to only a handful of conditions due to data silos and disconnected databases. The power of PHINs…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

How are Precision Health Insight Networks (PHINs) laying the groundwork for mainstream adoption of precision health? While recognized for its promise to save millions of lives and billions of dollars, the advancement of precision medicine has been limited to only a handful of conditions due to data silos and disconnected databases.

The power of PHINs was on full display during COVID-19. Now, these award-winning solutions are poised to drive innovations across many disease states.

Brad Bostic, CEO of HC1, had this to say about the topic.

“So, I’ve been often asked the question about personalized medicine and the practical nature of that, and, ultimately, will it ever be mainstream?

My point of view on that is absolutely it will be. What I see happening right now within health care is this Renaissance that gives us a chance at getting there sooner rather than later.

The first part of that being the incentive models in healthcare, where, historically, we’ve been focused on a fee-for-service model. That incentivizes volume, and it doesn’t really allow for the idea of anything being personalized.

In fact, I’d say it’s quite the opposite. If you’re volume-motivated, you’re looking at it more like widgets. How do I do as much as I can, as fast as I can? And it’s not intended to deliver a bad outcome to patients, but there’s just not the right incentive there.

What we have emerging now is more of a value-based model.

We now know enough about how much it should cost to take care of different conditions. And, if you implement best practices to take care of those conditions and you effectively manage those patients, you can have a budget like a bucket of money per person in a given disease state or a given demographic within a population to care for them.

If you can do it in a way that costs less than what you were allocated, you can make more profit, so that’s creating an incentive. That’s clearing the way for programs that healthcare leaders are interested in investing in — precision healthcare types of models. A specific example of that would be the ability to truly identify those people in your population that are taking medications that aren’t working for them and doing that by looking at a combination of that person’s diagnosis, that person’s medication list, and that person’s specific genomic profile.

It’s something that I believe will become extremely widespread in the coming months and years. In fact, I once had the head of the health plan for one of the largest technology companies on earth say to me, in the next five years, it will be considered criminal negligence to not perform these precision prescribing kinds of tests like pharmacogenetics, and that was a very extreme statement.

But his point was, if we know we have a test that’s relatively low cost, that can determine what medication is going to work for you and prevent you from having a heart stent or potentially some kind of catastrophic cardiac arrest event. why would we allow that not to happen? Why would we not run that test to make sure that we’re getting you on the optimal medication? And that’s just one small example.

I think ultimately, though, what we’ll find is the kind of experience that we’ve grown to appreciate and expect from consumer services.”

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @MarketScale

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Healthcare Insights

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are partnering up without changing who owns the hospital

Health systems are choosing alliances over mergers, per a July McDermott Will & Schulte analysis and four July deals tracked by Becker's Hospital Review. St. Christopher's, Nemours, Jefferson and Temple signed a nonbinding alliance letter; Palomar UC San Diego Health launched July 1. Ownership stays put; governance, purchasing and outpatient investment absorb the change.

  • 01In an alliance, the contract does the integrating that an org chart does in a merger: McDermott Will & Schulte says governance design, exclusivity, antitrust review, community commitments and exit rights all have to be settled before signing.
  • 02Purchasing is now explicitly on the table in at least one no-ownership deal, the St. Peter's Health and Billings Clinic-Logan Health talks in Montana, which means shared supply contracts can arrive without a change of control.

Sep 19, 2026

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

Telemedicine in eye care stops at the retinal scan unless imaging moves home

An Ophthalmology Times commentary by T.Y. Alvin Liu, Ferdinand Hui and Phillip Phan sorts eye patients into three telemedicine tiers by clinical need. Patients needing regular OCT scans benefit less unless a home device can send the image. Video tools already sit inside Epic and Cerner; the deciding purchase for retina clinics is the imaging device in the patient's living room.

  • 01The dividing line for eye telemedicine is imaging, not video: patients who need regular OCT scans benefit less from remote visits unless a device at home can send the scan, so a video license alone shifts few of those encounters.
  • 02The provider-side requirement, a HIPAA-compliant secured video platform, was already built into Epic and Cerner by 2020; the patient-side requirements (1.5 MB up and down bandwidth, a quiet private room, comfort with the technology) sit outside the health system's control and are the ones worth screening for at scheduling.
  • 03Self-administered home color fundus photography for tracking non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy was named as the nearer route into retina telemedicine; home OCT for wet AMD is the harder gate and the device to watch.

Sep 19, 2026

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Wolters Kluwer Health argues value-based care software is judged on whether customers hit incentive thresholds and avoid penalties. A Fierce Healthcare-reported survey it cites puts value-based care at a quarter or more of revenue for 30% of organizations. The analysis is a vendor publication that ends by pitching its own UpToDate Connect API.

  • 01The sharper question for any population health or care coordination platform is whether it changes what a clinician does at the moment of decision, or only reports afterward what happened. Wolters Kluwer's reading of the evidence is that many platforms still struggle with the first.
  • 02Vendors selling into value-based contracts now face a build-or-license decision on clinical content, because Wolters Kluwer names current, trusted content, consistent clinician adoption across sites, and a traceable link from guidance to quality metrics as the three hard problems.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512