Exploring the Different COVID Tests

 

On this episode of HealthFirst Talks, host Grace Huang welcomes two medical expert guests to discuss the different COVID-19 tests, their efficacy, and what test to use in different scenarios. Those guests are Dr. Scott Cohen, Chief Medical Information Officer and Chief Performance Improvement Officer for Bassett Healthcare Network, and Dr. Fiona Collins, dentist and international speaker and author.

Drs. Cohen and Collins explained the two types of COVID-19 tests: PCR tests and antigen tests. “There are two broad types of COVID-19 diagnostic tests. The antigen test takes the nasal fluid and looks for the presence of the antigen. If so, it’s positive. The PCR is looking for the presence of coronavirus RNA,” Dr. Cohen said.

Which is more accurate? Dr. Collins explained, “When looking at accuracy, diagnostic tests can be high sensitivity or high specificity. With high sensitivity, you have very few false negatives. With high specificity, very few false positives.”

The doctors agreed that false negatives were more concerning for COVID-19. With a false positive, the worst that could happen is isolation. A false negative could lead to spread.

When looking at the two tests, Dr. Collins shared, “PCR tests have high specificity and sensitivity. Antigen is only high specificity. It can have a false-negative rate of 15-20%.”

With this in mind, PCR testing is clearly the stronger test, but it may not always be the best choice. For post-exposure testing, Collins said, “PCR is more reliable, but it will take a few days to get back, so patients should quarantine until results.”

In the case of mass testing, the antigen test may be better because it acts as a monitoring system, and people are being tested regularly. “Antigen testing is fastest and least expensive. No lab is needed. Because you’re regular testing, you can overcome the sensitivity issue,” Dr. Cohen added.

Learn more about COVID testing and precautions to take by watching the conversation.

Recent Episodes

Healthcare leadership is being redefined in real time. With the rise of AI, mounting financial pressures, and workforce burnout, executives today are operating in an environment of continuous disruption and uncertainty. In fact, industry leaders now rank workforce shortages and digital transformation among their top concerns—forcing a new kind of leadership that blends decisiveness…

Healthcare systems are facing a workforce crisis that’s no longer temporary—it’s structural. Even before COVID-19, staffing shortages across nursing, technical, and administrative roles were already straining capacity; today, those gaps are wider, costlier, and directly impacting patient access. With labor shortages persisting and burnout rising, health systems are being forced to rethink not just…

Healthcare systems are entering 2026 under mounting pressure. A growing, aging population and rising disease burden are colliding with persistent workforce shortages—highlighted by projections that new cancer diagnoses in the U.S. will surpass two million this year alone. The stakes are no longer theoretical: delays in care, limited specialist access, and widening disparities are…