Identifying Key Metrics and Analyzing Data on Performance Gaps Enhance MLR Review Processes

 

Leveraging data to refine and enhance the promotional material review (MLR) process has become crucial in the ever-evolving landscape of life sciences. Organizations striving for efficiency and compliance need to understand how best to utilize available data to impact their workflow and overall success significantly.

How can organizations use data to improve their MLR review processes? What specific metrics and insights should they focus on?

This episode of  “Amend & Progress,” Vodori’s go-to podcast for all things promotional material features Jessy Horrell, VP of Customer Success at Vodori. She joins the host of the show, Annalise Ludtke to discuss the real-time analysis of promotional review data, uncovering insights and exploring how organizations can utilize this data to drive process improvements.

Key Points of Discussion

  • High-Level Metrics: Analyzing key performance indicators (KPIs) such as average job duration, feedback incorporation time, and review duration compared to industry benchmarks.
  • Workload Distribution: Understanding the distribution of tasks among reviewers and identifying potential bottlenecks or resource imbalances.
  • Performance Gaps: Identifying bottom performers and discussing strategies for supporting and improving their performance.

Jessy Horrell serves as the VP of Customer Success at Vodori, where she oversees customer onboarding and ongoing success with Vodori’s products. With a data-driven approach, Jessy helps clients understand and utilize their data to make informed decisions and enhance their MLR processes. Jessy holds a degree in Business Administration and has received numerous accolades for her contributions to customer success in the life sciences industry.

Recent Episodes

Health insurers love to advertise themselves as guardians of care, but the real story often begins when a patient’s life no longer fits neatly into a spreadsheet. In oncology especially, “coverage” isn’t a bureaucratic checkbox—it’s the fragile bridge between a treatment that finally works and a relapse that can undo years of grit…

In “Fighting for Coverage,” a patient describes a double war: the physical fight to stay alive and the bureaucratic fight to prove to an insurer that her life is worth the cost. Her account spotlights a core tension in the U.S. system—coverage decisions are increasingly shaped by prior authorizations and desk-based reviewers who…

The sustainability of the healthcare system won’t be secured by another round of cost-cutting or clever benefit design alone, but by a hard cultural pivot toward alignment: payers, providers, employers, and patient advocates pulling on the same rope instead of grading each other on different exams. Right now we’ve built a maze that…