Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

An App Could Change How Obesity is Assessed

The idea that something still widely used in the medical world is outdated is an unnerving thought. However, such is the case with the Body Mass Index (BMI), although this appears to be coming to an end. After more than a decade of research, Richard Barnes, CEO of Malvern, England-based Select Research and partners…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

By Dr. José Medina-Inojosa · ·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

The idea that something still widely used in the medical world is outdated is an unnerving thought. However, such is the case with the Body Mass Index (BMI), although this appears to be coming to an end.

After more than a decade of research, Richard Barnes, CEO of Malvern, England-based Select Research and partners at the Mayo Clinic in the U.S. have unveiled an antidote to the 1830s measurement tool that is BMI.

Mayo Clinic Research Associate Dr. Jose Medina-Inojosa, M.D. and Barnes believe Body Volume Index (BVI) is a much better determinant of whether someone is at risk for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes.

“[BMI] is not the complete picture and it’s designed for population statistics. So, for it to be used for an individual assessment of risk is, I believe, inappropriate,” Barnes said. “Yet, to be fair, there hasn’t been anything else available until now.”

What Barnes is calling Body Volume Indicator takes an individual person’s body and measures weight in seven segments as opposed to simply height and weight. This should better determine how at-risk an individual is, giving doctors a clearer course of action and potentially saving clients money on premiums.

The progression of personal technology has been critical to this innovation. Users have photos taken of themselves on a smart device and the software analyzes the images. People have become much more comfortable with this as technology has become a larger part of daily life in the past 10 years, according to Barnes.

“I can’t stress strongly enough the smartphone has allowed us to deliver that in a way we weren’t able to before,” Barnes said. “BMI is just height and weight and that simplicity always meant people had an excuse not to migrate to something else.”

Dr. Medina said the development will help hospitals integrate data on specific patients to the electronic health record system and support the growing field of telemedicine.

“I’m very hopeful this will ease the workload and help the actual face-to-face interactions between the practitioner and the patient,” he said.

The BVI app is currently available in the app store on Android and iOS to provide a demonstration. In the coming months the goal is that a number can be associated with pictures to appropriately assess risk.

For the latest news, videos, and podcasts in the Healthcare Industry, be sure to subscribe to our industry publication.

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @HealthMKSL

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

DJ
Dr. José Medina-InojosaCardiovascular disease fellow, Emory University School of Medicine

Dr. José Medina-Inojosa is a cardiovascular disease fellow at Emory University School of Medicine. His earlier work at Mayo Clinic included research on central obesity and cardiovascular risk. In his MarketScale conversations, he returns to practical questions: can a patient reach the clinician, obtain the prescription and understand why a recommendation matters? He co-hosted Health Matters with Alisa Johnsrud in 2021, bringing clinicians into conversations about prevention, health equity and public-health information. His later contributions explore virtual assessments, remote specialist collaboration and the transition to value-based care. In a discussion of body-volume assessment, he put the hoped-for benefit of technology in personal terms: less workload for practitioners and more useful face-to-face interaction with patients.

B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Underpayments in healthcare revenue cycle operations lack the visibility of denied claims because they don't trigger alerts or queue workflows. Without dedicated ownership and line-level verification against contract terms, paid claims that fall short of their contractual amount pass through undetected.

  • 01Denial workflows activate on rejection events, but underpayments produce no event, leaving paid claims unverified by default.
  • 02The speaker says many provider groups lack line-level contract intelligence to check each paid line against the applicable terms.
  • 03Payment received and payment checked are separate tasks: one verifies acceptance, the other verifies correctness—and the second often has no assigned owner.

Nov 6, 2026

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero payment on a claim line isn't automatically an underpayment; contract terms, particularly packaging rules, determine whether zero is correct. Chasing unsupported findings damages credibility with payers and weakens the position of legitimate disputes, so revenue cycle teams must verify the full contract terms and effective dates before treating any payment difference as a finding.

  • 01When a contract packages add-ons into the primary procedure, the add-on line may legitimately show zero payment because it is folded into the primary procedure reimbursement.
  • 02Pursuing payment differences that lack contract support burns credibility with payers and can weaken the team’s position on later disputes, including valid ones.
  • 03Always verify the complete contract terms, fee schedules, carve-outs, amendments, and the specific version in effect on the date of service before treating a payment variance as a recoverable underpayment.

Nov 6, 2026

A clean, paid, closed claim can still be short of the contract

A clean, paid, closed claim can still be short of the contract

Practices can receive payment on closed, clean claims that still fall short of negotiated contract amounts because billing ends at coding, submission and posting, while no role owns checking whether payer payments match fee schedules. The speaker argues that contract-level payment review is a separate, complementary function that compares closed claims to contract terms and, run continuously, helps surface shortfalls in time to act within timely filing windows.

  • 01Correctly coded and billed healthcare claims can still result in underpayment.
  • 02Practices should review closed-claim payments against contract terms to spot underpayments.
  • 03Discrepancies in claim payments can persist despite adherence to billing protocols.

Nov 6, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

About the Expert

DJ
Dr. José Medina-Inojosa

Cardiovascular disease fellow

Emory University School of Medicine

Dr. José Medina-Inojosa is a cardiovascular disease fellow at Emory University School of Medicine. His earlier work at Mayo Clinic included research on central obesity and cardiovascular risk. In his MarketScale conversations, he returns to practical questions: can a patient reach the clinician, obtain the prescription and understand why a recommendation matters? He co-hosted Health Matters with Alisa Johnsrud in 2021, bringing clinicians into conversations about prevention, health equity and public-health information. His later contributions explore virtual assessments, remote specialist collaboration and the transition to value-based care. In a discussion of body-volume assessment, he put the hoped-for benefit of technology in personal terms: less workload for practitioners and more useful face-to-face interaction with patients.

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512