Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

The European Union Has Announced the Finalized EU GMP Annex 1

The European Union has announced the finalized EU GMP Annex 1 for manufacturing sterile medicinal products. It is creating some reservations for manufacturers who are not certain how these changes may impact their total manufacturing operation and output. In particular, as the August 2023 deadline approaches manufacturers will need to take time to unpack the changes…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Promoted content from Benchmark Products on MarketScale.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

The European Union has announced the finalized EU GMP Annex 1 for manufacturing sterile medicinal products. It is creating some reservations for manufacturers who are not certain how these changes may impact their total manufacturing operation and output. In particular, as the August 2023 deadline approaches manufacturers will need to take time to unpack the changes and understand how they will impact their standard operating procedures.

Jennifer Parker, Director of Marketing at Benchmark Products, is advising manufacturers not to wait to consider these new policies. She anticipates the evaluation of SOPs against the guidelines in Annex 1 will require manufacturers to revise and overhaul processes, as well as implement entirely new processes.

Jennifer’s Thoughts:

Although drafts of the new Annex 1 regulations that govern the manufacturers of sterile medicinal products have been circulating for some years now, it still presents a number of challenges when it was actually released in August of this year. Companies will have some barriers when it comes to clients which they will need to meet by the deadline of August next year.

The first one is understanding the complexity of the Annex 1 regulations, being a 50-page document and affecting almost all the areas of production, it will take some time to read, understand, and then evaluate against your own SOPs. And then that’s where I think the biggest challenge is, around evaluating those SOPs against the guidelines. Will you need to rewrite entire operating procedures? Do you need to add new ones where there weren’t any before? And then finally, how are you going to validate your new SOPs? What criteria will you use and the types of products and procedures that you have in place already, will they be sufficient enough to meet the validation criteria?

These are all complex decisions that companies need to make within the deadline. So I really urge manufacturers that are undergoing this process to start early, form a team, and really understand how much work will be involved to get more manufacturing facilities up to compliance.

Benchmark Products

Part of this channel

Benchmark Products

ISO-certified cleanroom supplies for life science manufacturers.

Visit the channel

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Caris launches blood-based treatment response monitoring as Q3 revenue rises 27%

Caris launches blood-based treatment response monitoring as Q3 revenue rises 27%

Caris Life Sciences completed approximately 61,500 clinical cases in Q3 2026 and raised 2026 revenue guidance to $1.04-$1.05 billion. Caris Assure is now available for therapeutic response monitoring, and Caris Confirm, a minimal residual disease assay, is targeted to launch before year-end.

  • 01Caris said higher operating expenses were driven primarily by headcount-related costs, research and development investment and marketing.
  • 02Caris Assure is now available for therapeutic response monitoring, and Caris Confirm, a whole genome, tumor-informed assay for minimal residual disease, is targeted to launch before year-end.
  • 03Caris reaffirms its guidance for clinical therapy selection volume growth of approximately 20%.

Nov 8, 2026

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Denials get a queue, underpayments just look like paid claims

Underpayments in healthcare revenue cycle operations lack the visibility of denied claims because they don't trigger alerts or queue workflows. Without dedicated ownership and line-level verification against contract terms, paid claims that fall short of their contractual amount pass through undetected.

  • 01Denial workflows activate on rejection events, but underpayments produce no event, leaving paid claims unverified by default.
  • 02The speaker says many provider groups lack line-level contract intelligence to check each paid line against the applicable terms.
  • 03Payment received and payment checked are separate tasks: one verifies acceptance, the other verifies correctness—and the second often has no assigned owner.

Nov 6, 2026

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero-paid claim line is not automatically an underpayment

A zero payment on a claim line isn't automatically an underpayment; contract terms, particularly packaging rules, determine whether zero is correct. Chasing unsupported findings damages credibility with payers and weakens the position of legitimate disputes, so revenue cycle teams must verify the full contract terms and effective dates before treating any payment difference as a finding.

  • 01When a contract packages add-ons into the primary procedure, the add-on line may legitimately show zero payment because it is folded into the primary procedure reimbursement.
  • 02Pursuing payment differences that lack contract support burns credibility with payers and can weaken the team’s position on later disputes, including valid ones.
  • 03Always verify the complete contract terms, fee schedules, carve-outs, amendments, and the specific version in effect on the date of service before treating a payment variance as a recoverable underpayment.

Nov 6, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512