Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Political Opponents in Congress May Find Agreement Over the Benefits of Value-Based Care

Congress may not find a lot of unity to pass legislation. However, there is bipartisan support for value-based care. Melanie Musson, a health insurance expert with USInsuranceAgents.com, reminds providers, “Value-based care improves patient outcome, but it also reduces insurance provider costs.” Following the midterm elections and the split-party control, experts predict that there won’t be…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

·
Share

Free workspace

Turn your Healthcare expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Congress may not find a lot of unity to pass legislation. However, there is bipartisan support for value-based care. Melanie Musson, a health insurance expert with USInsuranceAgents.com, reminds providers, “Value-based care improves patient outcome, but it also reduces insurance provider costs.”

Following the midterm elections and the split-party control, experts predict that there won’t be many new laws passed. For health insurance providers, the split control could mean that insurance providers won’t have to scramble to keep up with new rules and regulations. Instead, they could spend the next two years focusing on improving procedures and plans.

There is a chance that both political parties could come together for a shared goal of value-based care. The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) Catalyst explains that value-based healthcare rewards physicians and hospital systems for patient outcomes rather than for patient treatment.

Value-Based Care Model

This incentive theoretically pushes healthcare providers to identify risks earlier and assist patients in improving their health before it deteriorates. The value-based model seeks not only to improve patient outcomes but also to decrease the average health insurance cost for consumers.

America’s healthcare system costs have far exceeded the rate of inflation, and most of the population wishes something could be done about it. That may give congress the drive to work together to draft legislation that will push insurance providers to shift focus from treatment to prevention.

Rethinking Best Practices

While dealing with the possibility of new rules isn’t fun, it may be in providers’ best interest to shift their focus in that direction before it’s required.

Research backs up the fact that prevention costs less than treatment. The Affordable Care Act pushed healthcare and insurance providers in that direction, but better incentives may help to move that focus forward.

Insurance providers have many rules to adhere to, especially if they offer Medicare Advantage plans. But there is room to incorporate best-value practices even under stringent guidelines.

How Preventative Care Saves Insurers

There are many case studies demonstrating how covering and incentivizing preventative care can save insurance providers. For example, when cancer is caught early, treatment options take less time and require fewer hospitalizations. Cancer that isn’t discovered until later stages may require two times or more treatments and extensive hospitalizations.

Since insurance providers are responsible for paying most of these costs, they can save money by elevating preventative care.

Insurers should always seek to improve their methods, and the bipartisan support of value-based care should prompt them to evaluate how they can incorporate that model into their coverage.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.
B2B Weekly

The week in Healthcare, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Healthcare Insights

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

Black Book: AI may make some outsourced health plan work cheaper to bring in-house

U.S. health plan administrative costs rose 2.7% to about $69.2 billion in the first half of 2026, even as margins improved to 4.1%. Black Book Research's 2027 outlook says AI is starting to move payer sourcing in both directions. Demand for specialist vendors stays strong in some functions, while automation could make in-house or hybrid models viable in others. The report recommends comparing each major outsourced service with rival vendors and the best internal or hybrid option, and checking whether projected savings become actual cash.

  • 01Every major outsourced payer service should be benchmarked against a rival vendor and against the plan's best feasible internal or hybrid model, a three-way contest at each renewal.
  • 02Avoided vacancies, projected productivity gains and payment recoveries are not recurring cash, so outsourcing savings should not be assumed to fund AI until the service, AI and funding cases each stand on their own.
  • 03Provider data sits on both sides of the sourcing question: it is a top pain point and a specialist-demand area, yet also one of the functions where automation could make hybrid or in-house models viable.

Nov 11, 2026

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham surgical tech program draws 65 for 12 seats

Hugh Chatham Health and Alleghany Health marked one year with Advocate Health as a surgical technology program drew 65 applicants for 12 seats. An anniversary release lists $11.3 million in pay and rewards and a $19.3 million capital figure, and says nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services through Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist. Local training seats look like the next limit in Elkin.

  • 01In rural North Carolina, a new surgical technology program drew more than five applicants per seat, which points to training capacity, not interest, as the thing to expand.
  • 02Pay and rewards totaled $11.3 million in year one, versus a $19.3 million capital figure—about 58% as large, by MarketScale’s arithmetic.
  • 03Nearly 1,000 patients were connected to specialty and higher-acuity services versus just over 70 virtual consultations and encounters (about 14:1 by MarketScale’s arithmetic), with expanded virtual care planned for year two.

Nov 10, 2026

Study: AI draft echo reports cut cardiologist time 46%

Study: AI draft echo reports cut cardiologist time 46%

Late-breaking research presented November 9 at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2026 reported that AI-drafted preliminary echocardiogram reports were comparable to human drafts. Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes finalizing AI drafts versus 8.5 minutes without AI. The findings are a non-peer-reviewed abstract.

  • 01Cardiologists averaged 4.6 minutes finalizing AI-drafted echo reports versus 8.5 minutes without AI, about 46% less time.
  • 02Cardiologists made substantial changes to 50.6% of AI drafts and 49.7% of human drafts.
  • 03The research used 1,200 echocardiograms from 21 Kaiser Permanente Northern California medical centers.

Nov 9, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512