Skip to content
MarketScale
‹ Back to IndustriesHealthcare

Political Opponents in Congress May Find Agreement Over the Benefits of Value-Based Care

Congress may not find a lot of unity to pass legislation. However, there is bipartisan support for value-based care. Melanie Musson, a health insurance expert with USInsuranceAgents.com, reminds providers, “Value-based care improves patient outcome, but it also reduces insurance provider costs.” Following the midterm elections and the split-party control, experts predict that there won’t be…

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Healthcare teams put it to work with Executive Thought Leadership.

Share

Get featured

Want to get featured in MarketScale Healthcare?

Create a free MarketScale workspace and get your company's expertise featured across our Healthcare coverage. No credit card, no demo required.

Start free

Congress may not find a lot of unity to pass legislation. However, there is bipartisan support for value-based care. Melanie Musson, a health insurance expert with USInsuranceAgents.com, reminds providers, “Value-based care improves patient outcome, but it also reduces insurance provider costs.”

Following the midterm elections and the split-party control, experts predict that there won’t be many new laws passed. For health insurance providers, the split control could mean that insurance providers won’t have to scramble to keep up with new rules and regulations. Instead, they could spend the next two years focusing on improving procedures and plans.

There is a chance that both political parties could come together for a shared goal of value-based care. The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) Catalyst explains that value-based healthcare rewards physicians and hospital systems for patient outcomes rather than for patient treatment.

Value-Based Care Model

This incentive theoretically pushes healthcare providers to identify risks earlier and assist patients in improving their health before it deteriorates. The value-based model seeks not only to improve patient outcomes but also to decrease the average health insurance cost for consumers.

America’s healthcare system costs have far exceeded the rate of inflation, and most of the population wishes something could be done about it. That may give congress the drive to work together to draft legislation that will push insurance providers to shift focus from treatment to prevention.

Rethinking Best Practices

While dealing with the possibility of new rules isn’t fun, it may be in providers’ best interest to shift their focus in that direction before it’s required.

Research backs up the fact that prevention costs less than treatment. The Affordable Care Act pushed healthcare and insurance providers in that direction, but better incentives may help to move that focus forward.

Insurance providers have many rules to adhere to, especially if they offer Medicare Advantage plans. But there is room to incorporate best-value practices even under stringent guidelines.

How Preventative Care Saves Insurers

There are many case studies demonstrating how covering and incentivizing preventative care can save insurance providers. For example, when cancer is caught early, treatment options take less time and require fewer hospitalizations. Cancer that isn’t discovered until later stages may require two times or more treatments and extensive hospitalizations.

Since insurance providers are responsible for paying most of these costs, they can save money by elevating preventative care.

Insurers should always seek to improve their methods, and the bipartisan support of value-based care should prompt them to evaluate how they can incorporate that model into their coverage.

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Healthcare starts with a company putting its clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Service-line buyers vet vendors quietly, and your clinicians become the proof they find while doing it.

Get your team featuredSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

Follow Healthcare Insights

Get new expert content in your inbox.

Healthcare: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Healthcare buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free plan

You just read one Healthcare expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your clinicians, service-line leaders, and field engineers into the articles, video, and social content Healthcare buyers are searching for. Create a free workspace and see it with your own people. No credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What you get, free

Your own MarketScale workspace, up to 10 people
One professional video edit a month for qualifying companies
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
$0, no credit card, nothing that expires

More Healthcare Insights

July partnerships show hospitals aligning without ownership change

July partnerships show hospitals aligning without ownership change

A July McDermott Will & Schulte analysis and four July partnership announcements tracked by Becker’s Hospital Review point to affiliation models that stop short of mergers. St. Christopher’s signed a nonbinding letter of intent with Nemours, Jefferson and Temple; Palomar UC San Diego Health began operating July 1 under a joint powers authority. Several announcements explicitly rule out ownership change, shifting the work to contracts covering governance and other terms.

  • 01In an alliance, the contract does the integrating that an org chart does in a merger: McDermott Will & Schulte says governance design, exclusivity, antitrust review, community commitments and exit rights all have to be settled before signing.
  • 02Purchasing is now explicitly on the table in at least one no-ownership deal, the St. Peter's Health and Billings Clinic-Logan Health talks in Montana, which means shared supply contracts can arrive without a change of control.

Sep 19, 2026

Eye telemedicine hits limits without home retinal imaging

Eye telemedicine hits limits without home retinal imaging

An Ophthalmology Times commentary by T.Y. Alvin Liu, Ferdinand Hui and Phillip Phan sorts eye patients into three telemedicine tiers by clinical need. Patients needing regular OCT scans benefit less unless a home device can send the image. Video tools already sit inside Epic and Cerner; the deciding purchase for retina clinics is the imaging device in the patient's living room.

  • 01The dividing line for eye telemedicine is imaging, not video: patients who need regular OCT scans benefit less from remote visits unless a device at home can send the scan, so a video license alone shifts few of those encounters.
  • 02The provider-side requirement, a HIPAA-compliant secured video platform, was already built into Epic and Cerner by 2020; the patient-side requirements (1.5 MB up and down bandwidth, a quiet private room, comfort with the technology) sit outside the health system's control and are the ones worth screening for at scheduling.
  • 03Self-administered home color fundus photography for tracking non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy was named as the nearer route into retina telemedicine; home OCT for wet AMD is the harder gate and the device to watch.

Sep 19, 2026

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Value-based care reaches a quarter of revenue at 30% of surveyed health organizations

Wolters Kluwer Health argues value-based care software is judged on whether customers hit incentive thresholds and avoid penalties. A Fierce Healthcare-reported survey it cites puts value-based care at a quarter or more of revenue for 30% of organizations. The analysis is a vendor publication that ends by pitching its own UpToDate Connect API.

  • 01The sharper question for any population health or care coordination platform is whether it changes what a clinician does at the moment of decision, or only reports afterward what happened. Wolters Kluwer's reading of the evidence is that many platforms still struggle with the first.
  • 02Vendors selling into value-based contracts now face a build-or-license decision on clinical content, because Wolters Kluwer names current, trusted content, consistent clinician adoption across sites, and a traceable link from guidance to quality metrics as the three hard problems.

Sep 18, 2026

Explore More Healthcare Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Healthcare.

Browse Healthcare Hub

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Healthcare and beyond.

Book a 15-minute demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512