Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesIndustrial IoT

Your DevOps maturity journey – part 1

This article introduces DevOps as a software engineering practice that unifies development and operations to create shorter, more efficient development cycles. It outlines how DevOps principles encompass integration, testing, release, deployment, and infrastructure management. The piece appears to be the first in a series exploring DevOps maturity journeys, referencing GalaxE as a related entity.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Industrial IoT teams put it to work with AI Visibility (GEO).

By Industrial Iot · · Promoted Content
Share

Key takeaways

01

DevOps unifies software development (Dev) and operations (Ops) to streamline the entire software lifecycle.

02

Core DevOps principles cover integration, testing, release, deployment, and infrastructure management.

03

Adopting DevOps leads to shorter development cycles and improved operational efficiency.

Free workspace

Turn your Industrial IoT expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

DevOps is a software engineering practice that aims at unifying software development (Dev) and software operation (Ops). DevOps principles call for monitoring all steps of software creation, beginning with integration, testing, and release, and then moving on to deployment and infrastructure management. This approach is more effective and efficient, leading to shorter development cycles. GalaxE can help you benchmark your current DevOps maturity and has provided a roadmap to reach your full potential.

Let’s take a brief look at each tier:

Tier 0: Traditional Waterfall – A step-by-step, serial process where each phase is completed before moving on to the next phase of development. This allows for easy maintenance of records for compliance.

Tier 1: Iterative Waterfall – Uses multiple “mini-releases” rather than creating one big software release at the end of the development process. This helps reduce risk and increase the incremental delivery of value.

Tier 2: Early Reviews – Engagement of the user community begins with this tier. Demos, visualization, process reviews, and business simulations provide ways to gather valuable feedback early in the development process, allowing the software project team to focus on the right items and take preventative steps to improve the probability of success.

Tier 3: Agile Team – Dedicated teams are designated for each step of full integration of new software, working together to ensure agility and continuity.

Tier 4: Transition to Agile – Transition to the use of agile artifacts and practices. Team members incorporate more QA measures to test the performance of their software as it is being developed, such as a focus on “Defined as Ready” (DoR) and “Defined as Done” (DoD), allowing accurate tracing between the old and new.

Tier 5: Agile Practices – The development team delivers frequent, usable versions of the product and uses knowledge they’ve acquired through processes and artifacts to fix mistakes they’ve found, building on the previous version.

Tier 6: CI/CV/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Validation/Continuous Development) – A proactive, test-driven approach that uses automation in build, test, and release mechanisms to ensure continuity and accuracy.

Tier 7: DevOps – The final tier is DevOps, which uses integrated delivery of development, support, and operations. DevOps uses automation and monitoring at all steps of software construction to create more frequent releases in order to “fail faster,” resulting in more dependable software.

Organizations strive to make it through these tiers of maturity to improve overall DevOps practices. DevOps, CI/CV/CD, and Agile Engineering give industries – even highly regulated ones, like healthcare – a software development process that uses customer feedback to quickly develop more cost-effective and higher quality products. The GalaxE solution helps them get there.

GalaxE is the only technology services firm that offers automated mapping, test design, and execution for CD/CI/CV through our enhanced tools, GxMaps™ and GxDash™. GxMaps™ is an automated dependency mapping tool that quickly identifies and assesses the impact of programming changes on people, processes, and systems. GxDash™ provides centralized command control and CxO level decision making with holistic information and implements an enterprise dashboard for all technology tiers, providing automation for building dependency maps, predictive analysis, code, and test case generation. ithout them, businesses risk being outpaced by the competition.

Learn more about GxMaps™ application dependency mapping software and how it can help you achieve DevOps environments at https://galaxe.com/gx-maps.

Read more at galaxe.com

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Industrial IoT starts with a company putting its controls engineers, plant-floor specialists, and integration partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Plant and controls buyers research deep before contact, and your engineers get to shape that research.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

II
Industrial Iot
B2B Weekly

The week in Industrial IoT, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Industrial IoT: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Industrial IoT buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Industrial IoT expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your controls engineers, plant-floor specialists, and integration partners into the articles, video, and social content Industrial IoT buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Industrial IoT Insights

Matt Kelly says packaging automation pays back under two years

Matt Kelly says packaging automation pays back under two years

Matt Kelly and Joe Bradley argue brownfield warehouses often speed up picking while leaving packing manual. SupplyChainBrain reported in June 2026 that Kelly said service-model packaging projects can pay back in as little as one month and capital projects in under two years. Sparck's published 3-second boxing benchmark shows why operators still need a workflow-by-workflow comparison.

  • 01SupplyChainBrain reported in June 2026 that Kelly said some service-model packaging projects can pay back in as little as one month and capital projects in under two years.
  • 02Bradley says BoxLast can work from a license plate ID, a unique order identifier, so the machine can print and apply a shipping label without preloading weights and dimensions.
  • 03Sparck benchmarks, up to 20 stations and a box every 3 seconds, illustrate why operators must compare throughput, staffing and machine scope.

Oct 2, 2026

For constant plant-floor process streams, a data historian is often a better fit than SQL Server or Oracle

For constant plant-floor process streams, a data historian is often a better fit than SQL Server or Oracle

Precedence Research values industrial IoT at USD 602.87B in 2026 and projects 16.8% CAGR to 2035, adding pressure to handle growing sensor data volumes.

  • 01Precedence Research values the industrial IoT market at USD 602.87 billion in 2026, growing 16.8% a year to 2035, so plant data streams keep getting larger.
  • 02In Schmidt’s example, historians can store a timestamped point when a value changes (skipping repeats), while logging every repeated reading in a relational table can increase storage and slow time-window reports.
  • 03Historians such as AVEVA PI handle capture; CrateDB argues cross-plant analytics often sits beside the historian, and Tiger Data notes teams want SQL/dashboards while generic relational tables can degrade as they grow.

Sep 30, 2026

CED: Specify holding brakes where gravity can move a servo axis

CED: Specify holding brakes where gravity can move a servo axis

CED’s Nicholas Rodacz demonstrates spring-set servo holding brakes. Selection requires the correct torque rating and manufacturer instructions; the bench demonstration does not replace a machine risk assessment or establish personnel safety.

  • 01A spring-set holding brake is intended to hold a stationary shaft within its rated torque; it is not automatically a safety brake.
  • 02Gravity and other stored energy should prompt checks of load holding, torque and any required safety measures.
  • 03Use the exact motor specification and manufacturer inspection procedure. Hand-turning a shaft is not a sufficient brake-identification or safety acceptance test.

Sep 30, 2026

Explore More Industrial IoT Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Industrial IoT.

Browse Industrial IoT Hub

About the Expert

II
Industrial Iot

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Industrial IoT and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512