Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesIndustrial IoT

Your DevOps maturity journey – part 2

This article is the second part of a series exploring DevOps maturity within industrial IoT and regulated software environments. It focuses on how organizations can address challenges in continuous delivery, integration, and validation by adopting DevOps principles. EY outlines how unifying software development and operations through DevOps can improve compliance and software delivery processes.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Industrial IoT teams put it to work with AI Visibility (GEO).

By Industrial Iot · · Promoted Content
Share

Key takeaways

01

DevOps unifies software development and operations to streamline delivery and improve compliance.

02

Continuous delivery, integration, and validation are key concerns DevOps helps organizations address.

03

Monitoring all steps of software creation is a core DevOps principle for achieving process maturity.

Free workspace

Turn your Industrial IoT expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Is your process for delivering new software applications detailed and compliant? If your organization is struggling with concerns around continuous delivery, integration, and validation, DevOps can help. DevOps is a software engineering practice that aims at unifying software development (Dev) and software operation (Ops). DevOps principles call for monitoring all steps of software creation, beginning with integration, testing, and release, and then moving on to deployment and infrastructure management. This approach leads to a more effective and efficient process, leading to shorter development cycles.

GalaxE can help you benchmark your current DevOps maturity and has provided a roadmap to reach your full potential. Let’s take a brief look at the first four tiers:

Tier 0: Traditional Waterfall – Traditional waterfall is the most basic form of software development. It is a step-by-step, serial process where each phase is completed before moving on to the next. Completing each step before moving on creates easy-to-maintain recordkeeping as the organization moves toward compliance. However, this approach is often more costly and less efficient than more agile approaches, since issues are typically discovered very late in the process.

Tier 1: Iterative Waterfall – Rather than creating one big software release at the end of the development process, an iterative waterfall creates multiple “mini-releases”. There are still distinct phases, but they are intertwined and overlap with one another. Process decomposition and process isolation are used to protect each part of the process. As each phase is completed, it is released to ensure it is working properly. This helps reduce risk and provides incremental delivery of value.

Tier 2: Early Reviews – Demos, visualization, process reviews, and business simulations are used to gather valuable feedback early in the development process. These early reviews give visibility to the project, provide confirmation of value, and help engage the user community. Early reviews allow the software project team to focus on the right items and take preventative steps to improve the probability of success.

Tier 3: Agile Team – In this approach, separate agile teams are designated for each step of full integration of new software. The teams work together to ensure agility and continuity. As each dedicated team focuses on addressing issues in its part of the process, its members gain valuable expertise, reducing wait times and the need for rework.

After climbing these tiers, an organization will move through Tiers 4-6: Transition to Agile, Agile Practices, and CI/CV/CD (Continuous Integration/Continuous Validation/Continuous Development), before reaching the highest level, Tier 7: DevOps. DevOps uses integrated delivery of development, support, and operations, along with automation and monitoring at all steps of software construction. This allows for more frequent releases in order to “fail faster,” resulting in more dependable software.

What’s different about the GalaxE approach is the capabilities of our enablement tools GxMaps™, GxDash™, and GxQuality™, which are a natural progression from QA automation. Once integrated, these tools enhance redundancy, diversity, reliability, and fault tolerance at the highest of levels. Integrating these solutions into your business is essential for efficient adaptation to shifting markets, regulation, and customer demands. Without them, businesses risk being outpaced by the competition.

Learn more about GxMaps™ application dependency mapping software and how it can help you achieve DevOps environments at https://galaxe.com/gx-maps/.

Read more at galaxe.com

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Industrial IoT starts with a company putting its controls engineers, plant-floor specialists, and integration partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Plant and controls buyers research deep before contact, and your engineers get to shape that research.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

II
Industrial Iot
B2B Weekly

The week in Industrial IoT, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Industrial IoT: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Industrial IoT buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Industrial IoT expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your controls engineers, plant-floor specialists, and integration partners into the articles, video, and social content Industrial IoT buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Industrial IoT Insights

For constant plant-floor process streams, a data historian is often a better fit than SQL Server or Oracle

For constant plant-floor process streams, a data historian is often a better fit than SQL Server or Oracle

Bill Schmidt of Renson House, in a recorded segment titled Data Historian, argues plant-floor process streams are better captured in a data historian than in Microsoft SQL Server or Oracle, since historians can store timestamps and changes rather than repeated readings and can make time-window reports feel faster. Precedence Research values industrial IoT at USD 602.87 billion in 2026, and vendor posts from CrateDB and Tiger Data describe where historians can fall short for broader analytics and why teams often want SQL access to that data.

  • 01Precedence Research values the industrial IoT market at USD 602.87 billion in 2026, growing 16.8% a year to 2035, so plant data streams keep getting larger.
  • 02In Schmidt’s example, historians can store a timestamped point when a value changes (skipping repeats), while logging every repeated reading in a relational table can increase storage and slow time-window reports.
  • 03Historians such as AVEVA PI handle capture; CrateDB argues cross-plant analytics often sits beside the historian, and Tiger Data notes teams want SQL/dashboards while generic relational tables can degrade as they grow.

Sep 30, 2026

CED: Specify holding brakes where gravity can move a servo axis

CED: Specify holding brakes where gravity can move a servo axis

CED’s Nicholas Rodacz demonstrates spring-set servo holding brakes. Selection requires the correct torque rating and manufacturer instructions; the bench demonstration does not replace a machine risk assessment or establish personnel safety.

  • 01A spring-set holding brake is intended to hold a stationary shaft within its rated torque; it is not automatically a safety brake.
  • 02Gravity and other stored energy require a machine-level assessment of load holding and any additional safety measures.
  • 03Use the exact motor specification and manufacturer inspection procedure. Hand-turning a shaft is not a sufficient brake-identification or safety acceptance test.

Sep 30, 2026

Mapbox says Traffic 2.0 gets arrival times right on 98% of trips

Mapbox says Traffic 2.0 gets arrival times right on 98% of trips

Mapbox says Traffic 2.0 gives accurate ETAs on 98% of trips. For logistics and field teams, the value is fresh road and place data AI agents can act on.

  • 01Traffic 2.0 claims accurate ETAs on 98% of trips, a vendor figure fleet teams can benchmark against ETA accuracy on their own lanes.
  • 02An AI agent that reroutes a driver is only as useful as the traffic data underneath it; Mapbox's agentic mapping engine processes anonymized movement data from over 45,000 applications.
  • 03The Places API, now in public preview, combines business listings with entrances, building footprints, operating hours and visitation patterns; leaving preview is one signal to watch.

Sep 28, 2026

Explore More Industrial IoT Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Industrial IoT.

Browse Industrial IoT Hub

About the Expert

II
Industrial Iot

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Industrial IoT and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512