Skip to content
‹ Back to IndustriesIndustrial IoT

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger on Foundry Business, Global Chip Shortage

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger discussed the company's plans to build a new foundry business amidst a global chip shortage anticipated to last a couple more years. He emphasized Intel's commitment to leading product innovation and supply chain resilience as part of their growth strategy.

This story was produced through MarketScale. See how Industrial IoT teams put it to work with AI Visibility (GEO).

By Industrial Iot · · BloombergChip ShortageFoundryIntel
Share
Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger on Foundry Business, Global Chip Shortage

Key takeaways

01

Intel aims to establish a significant foundry business to capitalize on increased global semiconductor demand.

02

Gelsinger sees the global chip shortage continuing for a few more years, impacting industries worldwide.

03

Intel plans to collaborate with companies like Apple and Qualcomm to expand its services despite being competitors.

Free workspace

Turn your Industrial IoT expertise into content.

Record interviews, organize footage, and write with AI on a free trial of the MarketScale platform for qualifying companies. No demo required, no credit card.

Try it Free

Intel Chief Executive Officer Pat Gelsinger discussed the company’s ambitions to create a new foundry business, and saying he sees the global chip shortage lasting “a couple more years.” Gelsinger spoke with Bloomberg’s Emily Chang about why change is something that’s fundamental to Intel’s business.

—

Gelsinger: I’m committed to the best products in every category that we participate in, the best cost structure and the most resilient supply chain, and we see this ability to leverage the industry, but also become a major supplier of foundry to the industry. This is a winning formula and the world is demanding more semiconductors than ever before. We were getting more digital and then COVID happened. And it’s accelerated. So we need to step into this in a big way. And I think our strategy is uniquely positioned for Intel to be able to execute on.

Host: Now, investors loved hearing you say Intel’s fixed all its problems. But Pat, you’ve been back at the company for just over a month. And we’re talking about production deadlines that were missed over years. What makes you so sure that you’ve diagnosed and solved the manufacturing problems?

Gelsinger: We’re moving to a yearly cadence of process innovations following that. So we’re on track to not only fix the issue, but be at parity and then parity plus and ultimately, we believe, sustained leadership into the future. So the path we’re on looked at the data quite extensively over the last month or so. And came to the conclusion, the team got to figure it out. We’re back. And as you’ve seen more broadly with our new Intel, IBM 2.0 strategy, as I’ve declared, Intel is back.

Host: Indeed now, you suggested companies like Apple and Qualcomm could be your customers. Why would they be your customers? If they are your competitors? Why should a fierce rival also work with you?

“We’ve estimated the overall foundry market at $100 billion by 2025 and we’re going to earnestly pursue a meaningful portion of that.” – Pat Gelsinger, Intel CEO

Gelsinger: Well, as you well know, Emily, and I think you’ve even written on the subject about coopetition and clearly, this idea that, you know, some domains, you might compete in, other domains, you might be competitors, I mean, customers and partners as well. And for that, you know, there’s very few companies that can step into advanced semiconductor technology, something that we’ve only used for our internal needs at scale before. But now we’re saying we’re going to open our fab doors wide for the industry. And with that in mind, you know, customers are looking and saying, huh, you know, I only have TSMC, Samsung and Intel as the leading choices. And only one of those is a Western US and European soil at scale. Wow, I need a more balanced supply chain. I want to have at least two suppliers of my advanced technology choices. And Intel is saying we are going to be that. But, you know, there might be some skepticism because we’ve somewhat half heartedly tried some of this in the past. And we’re saying we are boldly going down this path. We’re going to have our best technologies, our unique 3D packaging technologies, and I’m going to be making all of my intellectual property available, including my x86 course for these customers. So we’re really going at it with the best that Intel has to offer. And the world needs more semiconductors. The world needs a more balanced supply chain. We’re one of the few companies that can step in to do that.

Host: What are the financial implications of the move? You’re obviously raising your capital spend by $6 billion. When does this all start paying off?

Gelsinger: Well, it is a capital intensive cycle, takes a couple of years to build fab. So you invest well before you have that foundry capability up and running at scale. That said, we are seeing extraordinary demand signals from the industry for today’s products. So part of this is I get to flexibly build capacity that meets my products as well as foundry needs. And we expect that we’ll run a factory network that has some optimized for our products, some optimized for foundry and some flex fabs in between, because we need to be at scale across the business. But we do think it takes a couple of years to build this out as designs take time to be committed to a new process. And then test them ramping in manufacturing. But we’re underway. We already have some existing foundry customers at small scale that will start ramping up more rapidly. So this business will get underway. We’ve estimated the overall foundry market at $100 billion by 2025 and we’re going to earnestly pursue a meaningful portion of that.

*Bloomberg contributed to this content

—

Follow us on social media for the latest updates in B2B!

Twitter – @MarketScale

Facebook – facebook.com/marketscale

LinkedIn – linkedin.com/company/marketscale

Your experts belong here

Every story in MarketScale Industrial IoT starts with a company putting its controls engineers, plant-floor specialists, and integration partners on the record. Buyers are already reading this topic. The only question is whose experts they find.

Plant and controls buyers research deep before contact, and your engineers get to shape that research.

Book DemoSee how it works15 minutes, straight to a calendar.

About the author

II
Industrial Iot
B2B Weekly

The week in Industrial IoT, and sixteen other industries, every Monday.

Ten stories, one-line takes, five minutes. Free.

Industrial IoT: are you visible to AI?

Before they reach out, Industrial IoT buyers ask AI engines which vendors to trust. Explore how your experts, customers, and partners can become useful content for buyers and AI search.

Free Trial

You just read one Industrial IoT expert. Your company is full of them.

This article was produced through MarketScale. The same platform turns your controls engineers, plant-floor specialists, and integration partners into the articles, video, and social content Industrial IoT buyers are searching for. Start a free trial and see it with your own people. For qualifying companies, no credit card, no demo required.

NPS +73 · 1,000+ creators · 38+ countries

What your free trial includes

Hands-on access to the MarketScale platform
Media requests to your crowd, remote recording, AI writing tools
No demo required. No credit card.
For qualifying companies. Company confirmation required.

More Industrial IoT Insights

Matt Kelly says brownfield packing can pay back under two years

Matt Kelly says brownfield packing can pay back under two years

Matt Kelly and Joe Bradley argue brownfield warehouses often speed up picking while leaving packing manual. SupplyChainBrain reported in June 2026 that Kelly said service-model packaging projects can pay back in as little as one month and capital projects in under two years. Sparck's published 3-second boxing benchmark shows why operators still need a workflow-by-workflow comparison.

  • 01SupplyChainBrain reported in June 2026 that Kelly said some service-model packaging projects can pay back in as little as one month and capital projects in under two years.
  • 02Bradley says BoxLast can work from a license plate ID, a unique order identifier, so the machine can print and apply a shipping label without preloading weights and dimensions.
  • 03Sparck's published benchmarks, up to 20 manual stations replaced and a box every 3 seconds, show operators should compare throughput, staffing and machine scope before choosing a brownfield packaging path.

Oct 2, 2026

For constant plant-floor process streams, a data historian is often a better fit than SQL Server or Oracle

For constant plant-floor process streams, a data historian is often a better fit than SQL Server or Oracle

Precedence Research values industrial IoT at USD 602.87B in 2026 and projects 16.8% CAGR to 2035, adding pressure to handle growing sensor data volumes.

  • 01Precedence Research values the industrial IoT market at USD 602.87 billion in 2026, growing 16.8% a year to 2035, so plant data streams keep getting larger.
  • 02In Schmidt’s example, historians can store a timestamped point when a value changes (skipping repeats), while logging every repeated reading in a relational table can increase storage and slow time-window reports.
  • 03Historians such as AVEVA PI handle capture; CrateDB argues cross-plant analytics often sits beside the historian, and Tiger Data notes teams want SQL/dashboards while generic relational tables can degrade as they grow.

Sep 30, 2026

CED: Specify holding brakes where gravity can move a servo axis

CED: Specify holding brakes where gravity can move a servo axis

CED’s Nicholas Rodacz demonstrates spring-set servo holding brakes. Selection requires the correct torque rating and manufacturer instructions; the bench demonstration does not replace a machine risk assessment or establish personnel safety.

  • 01A spring-set holding brake is intended to hold a stationary shaft within its rated torque; it is not automatically a safety brake.
  • 02Gravity and other stored energy should prompt checks of load holding, torque and any required safety measures.
  • 03Use the exact motor specification and manufacturer inspection procedure. Hand-turning a shaft is not a sufficient brake-identification or safety acceptance test.

Sep 30, 2026

Explore More Industrial IoT Insights

Read more expert perspectives from across Industrial IoT.

Browse Industrial IoT Hub

About the Expert

For B2B teams

Your experts could be publishing here

Stories like this one run on content MarketScale captures from real practitioners. See how your team's expertise becomes coverage in Industrial IoT and beyond.

Book a Demo

Or call us. No forms required. We pick up. 214-945-2512